Do people who are about to make a decision differ from people who are about to enact a decision just made with respect to (1) the contents of their spontaneous stream of thought, and (2) aspects of cognitive functioning reflective of short-term memory? Subjects either made a choice between, or were assigned to, two available test materials allegedly designed to measure creativity and differentially suited to promote an individual's full creative potential. Subjects were, however, interrupted prior to or shortly after making this choice: In Study 1, they were asked to report on the thoughts they experienced during the time period just before the interruption; in Study 2, subjects were interrupted either before or after making a choice and were asked to recall lists of words designed to test memory span. The results of Study 1 confirmed our assumption that predecisional versus postdecisional streams of spontaneous thought reflectmotivational versusvolitional states of mind. That is, predecisional thought was preoccupied with incentive values of goal options, expectancy of performance outcomes, and metamotivational directives, whereas postdecisional thought was concerned with questions of how to implement the pursued goal. In Study 2, subjects in a motivational state of mind exhibited a greater memory span than subjects in a volitional state of mind. Since, in a further study, performance on arithmetic tasks did not improve for subjects in a motivational as opposed to a volitional state of mind, the results of Study 2 are understood as a state-dependent increase in receptivity with respect to incoming information. In interpreting the present findings, the characteristic features of motivational and volitional states are explicated. Furthermore, it is suggested that the dominating research tradition focusing on motivational problems (i.e., expectancy-value models) and the abandoned research tradition concerned with volitional problems (i.e., formation and implementation of an intent) should be integrated into a functional unit.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Ach, N. (1905).Über die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Ach, N. (1910).Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior.Psychological Review, 64 359–372.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964).An introduction to motivation. Princeton, New Jersey: Van Nostrand.
Atkinson, J. W., & Raynor, J. O. (Eds.). (1974).Motivation and achievement. Washington, D.C.: Winston.
Düker, H. (1949). Über ein Verfahren zur Untersuchung der psychischen Leistungsfähigkeit.Psychologische Forschung, 23 10–24.
Feather, N. T. (Ed.). (1982).Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Heckhausen, H., Boteram, N., & Fisch, R. (1970). Attraktivitätsänderungen der Aufgabe nach Misserfolg: Kognitive Dissonanztheorie versus Leistungmotivationstheorie.Psychologische Forschung, 33 208–222.
Heckhausen, H., & Kuhl, J. (1985). From wishes to action: The dead ends and short cuts on the long way to action. In M. Frese & J. Sabini (Eds.),Goal-directed behavior: Psychological theory and research on action. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Karabenick, S. A., & Yousseff, Z. I. (1968). Performance as a function of achievement level and perceived difficulty.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10 414–419.
Kuhl, J. (1983).Motivation, Konflikt und Handlungskontrolle. Berlin: Springer.
Lane, D. M., & Pearson, D. A. (1982). The development of selective attention.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 28 317–337.
Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3 157–189.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 84 231–259.
Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954).Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.
We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Martina Eckert and Thomas Grözinger, who ably served as experimenters. Jürgen Beckmann, Ronald F. Kinney, and Franz E. Weinert made helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.
About this article
Cite this article
Heckhausen, H., Gollwitzer, P.M. Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational versus volitional states of mind. Motiv Emot 11, 101–120 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992338
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Functioning
- Test Material
- Performance Outcome
- Functional Unit