This article describes the findings of a program of research exploring the cognitive and behavioral consequences of passionate concern about government policy issues. American citizens vary a great deal in terms of the personal importance they attach to their attitudes on particular policy issues. Citizens whose policy attitudes are especially important to them are likely to think frequently about those attitudes, to perceive competing candidates as being relatively polarized on the issue, and to form presidential candidate preferences on the basis of those attitudes. Also, policy attitudes that citizens consider personally important are highly resistant to change and are therefore especially stable over long periods of time. The American public appears to be structured into many small issue publics, each composed of citizens who are passionately concerned about a single issue. Most Americans fall into very few issue publics, the particular ones being determined by each individual's unique self-interests, social identifications, and cherished values. The implications of these findings for the workings of democracies are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alderman, J. D. (1985). Reagan won on the issues, not just his personality. InThe '84 Vote, C. Smith (ed.). New York: ABC, Inc.
Almond, G. A. (1950).The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger.
Alwin, D. F. (1974). Approaches to the interpretation of relationships in the multitrait-multimethod matrix. InSociological Methodology 1973–1974, H. L. Costner (ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Apsler, R., and Sears, D. O. (1968). Warning, personal involvement, and attitude change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9: 162–166.
Becker, L. B., and McLeod, J. M. (1976). Political consequences of agenda-setting.Mass Communication Review 3: 8–15.
Bradburn, N. M., and Caplovitz, D. (1965).Reports on Happiness: A Pilot Study of Behavior Related to Mental Health. Chicago: Aldine.
Brent, E. E., and Granberg, D. (1982). Subjective agreement and the presidential candidates of 1976 and 1980.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 393–403.
Brickner, M. A., Harkins, S. G., and Ostrom, T. M. (1986). Effects of personal involvement: Thought-provoking implications for social loafing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 763–769.
Byrne, D. (1971).The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
Cacioppo, J. T., and Petty, R. E. (1981). Effects of extent of thought on the pleasantness ratings of P-O-X triads: Evidence for three judgmental tendencies in evaluating social situations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 1000–1009.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. A., and Stokes, D. E. (1960).The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carmines, E., and Stimson, J. (1980). The two faces of issue voting.American Political Science Review 74: 78–91.
Cialdini, R. B., Levy, A., Herman, P., Kozlowski, L., and Petty, R. E. (1976). Elastic shifts of opinion: Determinants of direction and durability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 663–672.
Comstock, G., Chaffee, S., Katzman, N., McCombs, M., and Roberts, D. (1978).Television and Human Behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.
Conover, P. J. (1981). Political cues and the perception of candidates.American Politics Quarterly 9: 427–448.
Converse, J. M. (1977). Predicting no opinion in the polls.Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 515–530.
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in the mass public. InIdeology and Discontent, D. E. Apter (ed.). New York: Free Press.
Converse, P. E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue. InThe Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, E. R. Tufte (ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Crano, W. D. (1983). Assumed consensus of attitudes: The effect of vested interest.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9: 597–608.
Dahl, R. A. (1956).A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Davis, O. A., Hinich, M. J., and Ordeshook, P. C. (1970). An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process.American Political Science Review 64: 426–448.
Downs, A. (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
Ewing, T. N. (1942). A study of certain factors involved in changes of opinion.Journal of Social Psychology 16: 63–88.
Faulkenberry, G. D., and Mason, R. (1978). Characteristics of nonopinion and no opinion response groups.Public Opinion Quarterly 42: 533–543.
Feldman, S., and Conover, P. J. (1983). Candidates, issues and voters: The role of inference in political perception.Journal of Politics 45: 810–839.
Ferber, R. (1966). Item nonresponse in a consumer survey.Public Opinion Quarterly 30: 399–415.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations 7: 117–140.
Festinger, L. (1957).A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fine, B. J. (1957). Conclusion-drawing, communicator credibility, and anxiety as factors in opinion change.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 54: 369–374.
Francis, J. D., and Busch, L. (1975). What we now know about “I don't knows.”Public Opinion Quarterly 39: 207–218.
Freedman, J. L. (1964). Involvement, discrepancy, and change.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 69: 290–295.
Gallup, G. (1981).The Gallup Report, no. 191. Princeton, NJ: Gallup Organization.
Goldberg, A. S. (1969). Social determinism and rationality as bases of party identification.American Political Science Review 63: 5–25.
Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
Hibbs, D. A., Rivers, R. D., and Vasilotos, N. (1982). The dynamics of political support for American presidents among occupational and partisan groups.American Journal of Political Science 26: 312–332.
Higgins, E. T., and King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individuals and contextual variability. InPersonality, Cognition and Social Interaction, N. Cantor and J. Kihlstrom (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Hovland, C. I., Campbell, E. H., and Brock, T. C. (1957). The effects of “Commitment” on opinion change following communication. InThe Order of Presentation in Persuasion, C. I. Hovland, W. Mandell, E. H. Campbell, T. C. Brocks, A. S. Luchins, A. R. Cohen, W. J. McGuire, I. L. Janis, R. L. Feierabend, and N. H. Anderson. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hyman, H. H. and Sheatsley, P. B. (1947). Some reasons why information campaigns fail.Public Opinion Quarterly 11: 412–423.
Jackman, M. R. (1977). Prejudice, tolerance, and attitudes toward ethnic groups.Social Science Research 6: 145–169.
Jackson, J. E. (1973). The importance of issues and issue importance in presidential elections. Harvard University, Typescript.
Judd, C. M., and Johnson, J. T. (1981). Attitudes, polarization, and diagnosticity: Exploring the effects of affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41: 26–36.
Judd, C. M., and Krosnick, J. A. (1989). The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: The effects of political expertise and attitude importance. InAttitude Structure and Function, A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, and A. G. Greenwald (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes.Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 163–204.
Kelley, S. (1983).Interpreting Elections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Key, V. O. (1961).Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.
Key, V. O. (1966).The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kinder, D. R., and Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. InHandbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum Associates, pp. 659–741.
Kingdon, J. W. (1981).Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper and Row.
Klein, E. (1984).Gender Politics: From Consciousness to Mass Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knower, F. H. (1936). Experimental studies of changes in attitude—III: Some incidence of attitude changes.Journal of Applied Psychology 20: 114–127.
Krech, D., and Crutchfeld, R. S. (1948).Theory and Problems of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Krosnick, J. A. (1986). Policy voting in American presidential elections: An application of psychological theory to American politics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Krosnick, J. A. (1988a). The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: A study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 196–210.
Krosnick, J. A. (1988b). Attitude importance and attitude change.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24: 240–255.
Krosnick, J. A. (1989). Attitude importance and attitude accessibility.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15: 297–308.
Krosnick, J. A., and Schuman, H. (1988). Attitude intensity, importance and certainty and susceptibility to response effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 940–952.
Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Berent, M. K., and Carnot, C. G. (1988). The origins of attitude importance. Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
Lemon, N. (1973).Attitudes and Their Measurement. London: Batsford.
Lewin, K. (1951).Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper.
Lippmann, W. (1922).Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan.
Lippmann, W. (1925).The Phantom Public. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Luker, K. (1984).Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Madsen, D. B. (1978). Issue importance and group choice shifts: A persuasive arguments approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 1118–1127.
Marx, G. T. (1967).Protest and Prejudice: A Study of Belief in the Black Community. New York: Harper and Row.
McGuire, W. J. (1960). A syllogistic analysis of cognitive relationships. InAttitude Organization and Change, M. J. Rosenberg, C. I. Hovland, W. J. McGuire, R. P. Abelson, and J. W. Brehm. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Miller, A. H., Miller, W. E., Raine, A. S. and Brown, T. A. (1976). A majority party in disarray: Policy polarization in the 1972 election.American Political Science Review 70: 753–778.
Modigliani, A., and Gamson, W. A. (1979). Thinking about politics.Political Behavior 1: 5–30.
Neuman, W. R. (1985).The Paradox of Mass Publics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newcomb, T. M. (1956). The prediction of interpersonal attraction.American Psychologist 11: 575–586.
Newcomb, T. M. (1961).The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Newcomb, T. M., Turner, R. H., and Converse, P. E. (1965).Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review 84: 231–259.
Ostrom, T. M., and Brock, T. C. (1968). A cognitive model of attitudinal involvement. InTheories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook, R. P. Abelson et al. (eds.). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Ostrom, T. M., and Brock, T. C. (1969). Cognitive bonding to central values and resistance to a communicating change in policy orientation.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 4: 42–50.
Page, B. I. (1976). The theory of political ambiguity.American Political Science Review 70: 742–752.
Page, B. I. (1978).Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pennock, J. R. (1979).Democratic Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986).Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Polsby, N. W., and Wildavsky, A. (1984).Presidential Elections. New York: Scribner.
Pomper, G. M. (1972). From confusion to clarity: Issues and American voters, 1956–1968.American Political Science Review 66: 415–428.
Pomper, G. M. (1975).Voters' Choice. New York: Harper and Row.
Pomper, G. M., Baker, R. K., Jacob, C. E., Keeter, S., McWilliams, W. C. and Plotkin, H. A. (1985).The Election of 1984: Reports and Interpretations. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Popkin, S., Gorman, J. W., Phillips, C., and Smith, J. A. (1976). Comment: What have you done for me lately? Toward an investment theory of voting.American Political Science Review 70: 779–805.
Rhine, R. J., and Severance, L. J. (1970). Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16: 175–190.
Rokeach, M. (1968).Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rokeach, M. (1973).The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.
Rosenau, J. N. (1961).Public Opinion and Foreign Policy. New York: Random House.
Rosenberg, M. J. (1956). Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 53: 367–372.
Schuman, H., and Presser, S. (1981).Questions and Answers: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.
Scott, W. A. (1968). Attitude measurement. InThe Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, G. Lindzey and A. Aronson (eds.), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Shepsle, K. A. (1972). The strategy of ambiguity: Uncertainty and electoral competition.American Political Science Review 66: 555–568.
Sherif, C. W. (1980). Social values, attitudes, and the involvement of the self. InNebraska Symposium on Motivation 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes and Values, M. M. Page (ed.) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 1–64.
Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., and Nebergall, R. E. (1965).Attitude and Attitude Change. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
Sherif, M., and Cantril, H. (1947).The Psychology of Ego-involvements. New York: Wiley.
Sherif, M., and Hovland, C. I. (1953). Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement: Placement of items with individual choice of number of categories.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 48: 135–141.
Sherif, M., and Hovland, C. I. (1961).Social Judgement: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Singer, J. E. (1968). The bothersomeness of inconsistency. InTheories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook, R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. Mcguire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, and P. H. Tannenbaum (eds.) Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 393–399.
Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., and White, R. W. (1956).Opinions and Personality. New York: Wiley.
Smith, T. W. (1982). Attitude constraint as a function of non-affective dimensions.General Social Survey Technical Report No.39. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
Stimson, J. A. (1975). Belief systems: Constraint, complexity and the 1972 election.American Journal of Political Science 19: 393–418.
Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition.American Political Science Review 57: 368–377.
Tedin, K. L. (1980). Assessing peer and parent influence on adolescent political attitudes.American Journal of Political Science 24: 136–154.
Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., and Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 577–585.
Verba, S., and Brody, R. A. (1970). Participation, political preferences, and the War in Vietnam.Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 325–332.
Verba, S., and Nie, N. H. (1972).Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper.
Wolfinger, R. E., and Rosenstone, S. J. (1980).Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Wood, W. (1982). Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 798–810.
Wood, W., Kallgren, C. A., and Preisler, R. M. (1985). Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21: 73–85.
Yankelovich, D., Skelly, F., and White, A. (1981).The Mushiness Index: A Refinement in Public Policy Polling Techniques. New York: Yankelovich, Clancey, Shulman.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krosnick, J.A. Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America. Polit Behav 12, 59–92 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992332
- Behavioral Consequence
- Government Policy
- Policy Issue
- Policy Attitude
- Issue Public