Abstract
This article examines the relationship between self-designated political ideology, opinions on twenty-one issues, and campaign activity at local, state, and national levels. The samples examined include delegates to the 1984 Party Conventions in eleven states. Generally, the findings indicate that ideology and issue position are most strongly associated with activity in national campaigns. Among Democrats liberalism is associated with national activity, whereas among Republicans those who are conservative are most active in national campaigns. Some important intraparty differences are found between local campaign activists and national activists. For example, among Democrats local campaign activists are much more conservative than national activists on several issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, Paul A., and Jennings, M. Kent (1979). Political periods and political participation.American Political Science Review 73: 737–750.
Beck, Paul A., and Jennings, M. Kent (1984). Updating political periods and political participation.American Political Science Review 78: 198–201.
Burrell, Barbara, and Carlson, James M. (1987). Issue Coalitions and Cleavages Among Party Activists. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.
Carlson, James, and Burrell, Barbara (1987). A new cleavage in the Democratic Party?: A comparison of Mondale and Hart supporters at the Connecticut State Democratic Convention.Polity 20 (Fall): 101–113.
Crotty, William (1977).Political Reform and the American Experiment. New York: Crowell.
Crotty, William, and Jackson, John S., III (1985).Presidential Primaries and Nominations. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Finkel, Steven E., and Trevor, Gregory (1986). Reassessing ideological bias in campaign participation.Political Behavior 8: 374–390.
Jackson, John S., III, Brown, Barbara Leavitt, and Bositis, David, (1982). Herbert McCloskey and friends revisited: 1980 Democratic and Republican Party elites compared to the mass public.American Politics Quarterly 10: 158–180.
Jackson, John S., III (1985). Political Party Leaders and the Mass Public: 1980–1984. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 19, 1985.
Montjoy, Robert S., Shaffer, William R., and Weber, Ronald (1980). Mass and political elite beliefs and the policies of the regime.American Politics Quarterly 8 (July): 319–343.
Nexon, D. (1971). Asymmetry in the political system: Occasional activists in the Republican and Democratic Parties, 1956–1964.American Political Science Review 65: 716–730.
Nie, Norman, Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John (1979).The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ranney, Austin (1975).Curing the Mischiefs of Faction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shafer, S. D. (1980). The policy bias of political activists.American Politics Quarterly 8 (January): 15–33.
Verba, S., and Nie, N. (1972).Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlson, J.M., Burrell, B. & Dolan, K. Ideology and campaign activity at three levels of government. Polit Behav 11, 273–287 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992300
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992300