Skip to main content
Log in

The combined effect of personalized appeal and precoding of personal data on questionnaire returns

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the combined effect on return rates of personalizing the cover letter and including precoded personal information on a mail questionnaire. The 2 × 2 factorial design allowed for the testing of an interaction effect as well as for main effects. The study found no interactive effect between the kind of cover letter sent and whether or not subjects were given the option of removing the precoded data. In addition, neither of the main effects was significant. The finding that the inclusion of precoded personal data on a questionnaire does not impair return rates may be welcome news to investigators in higher education conducting studies in which they have prior knowledge of respondent characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Athabasca University. (1985, October).Study of AU Graduates. Report prepared by the Office of Institutional Studies, Athabasca University, Canada.

  • Andreason, Alan R. (1970). Personalizing mail questionnaire correspondence.Public Opinion Quarterly 34(2): 273–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdie, Douglas R., and Anderson, John F. (1974).Questionnaires: Design and Use. Metuchen, N.J.: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Edwin H. (1974–75). Personalizing mail surveys: A replication and reassessment.Public Opinion Quarterly 38(4): 614–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, Dean, and Sear, Alan. (1969). Questionnaire response rate: A methodological analysis.Social Forces 47(3): 335–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childers, Terry L., and Ferrel, O.C. (1979). Response rates and perceived questionnaire length in mail surveys.Journal of Marketing Research 16: 429–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J. A., and Ford, Robert N. (1947). Controlling bias in mail questionnaires.Journal of the American Statistical Association 42(240): 497–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, John P.; Casey, Michael; Wyckoff, Daniel; and Wynd, William. (1977). Invisible coding of survey questionnaires.Public Opinion Quarterly 41(1): 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Don A., and Frey, James H. (1974). Contribution of personalization to mail questionnaire response as an element of a previously tested method.Journal of Applied Psychology 59(3): 297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdos, Paul L., and Regier, James. (1977). Visible vs. disguised keying on questionnaires.Journal of Advertising Research 17(1): 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantasia, Saverio C.; Henig, Sherry; Grubler Gochman, Eva R.; Adams, Nancy G.; and Jackson, Shirley J. (1977). Effects of personalized sponsorship of an additional covering letter on return rate and nature of evaluative response.Psychological Reports 41(1): 151–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawash, Mary B., and Aleamoni, Lawrence M. (1971). Effect of personal signature on the initial rate of return of a mailed questionnaire.Journal of Applied Psychology 55(6): 589–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, Roger A. (1974). Personalization strategies, response rate and response quality in a mail survey.Social Science Quarterly 55(1): 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, Jerome B. (1971). Are “bulk-rate” occupants really unresponsive?Public Opinion Quarterly 35(3): 420–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landy, Frank I., and Bates, Frederick. (1973). The non-effect of three variables on mail survey response rate.Journal of Applied Psychology 58(1): 147–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, Arnold S. (1965). A factorial experiment in inducing responses to a mail questionnaire.Sociology and Social Research 49(2): 183–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longworth, Donald S. (1953). Use of a mail questionnaire.American Sociological Review 18: 310–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, David J., and McConnell, Jon P. (1970). Mail questionnaire response induction: The effect of four variables on the response of a random sample to a difficult questionnaire.Social Science Quarterly 51(2): 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteson, Michael T. (1974). Type of transmittal letter and questionnaire color as two variables influencing response rates in a mail survey.Journal of Applied Psychology 59(4): 535–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeher, G. Allen. (1963). Effective techniques in increasing response to mailed questionnaires.Public Opinion Quarterly 27(2): 299–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Raymond. (1967). Responses to personal and form letters in mail surveys.Journal of Advertising Research 7(1): 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snelling, W. Rodman. (1969). The impact of a personalized mail questionnaire.The Journal of Educational Research 63(3): 126–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Robert E. (1974–75). Does precoding mail questionnaires affect response rates?Public Opinion Quarterly 38(4): 621–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weilbacher, William M., and Walsh, H. R. (1952). Mail questionnaires and the personalized letter of transmittal.Journal of Marketing 16(3): 331–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, Frederick. (1976). A reassessment of the effects of personalization on response patterns in mail surveys.Journal of Marketing Research 13(1): 110–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was given at the 1986 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association held in San Francisco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shale, D. The combined effect of personalized appeal and precoding of personal data on questionnaire returns. Res High Educ 26, 299–310 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992242

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992242

Keywords

Navigation