Abstract
This paper presents a model of turnout that extends the Riker and Ordeshook (1968) model to account for the purchase of new information for assessing outcome-contingent benefits and that seeks to integrate the various institutional, sociological, psychological, and economic factors that have been advanced to account for turnout in American presidential elections. Personal and institutional data from the 1972 and 1976 ICPSR NES Panel Study and Vote Validation Survey are used to test the model. The results suggest that a variety of factors are important in influencing the turnout decision, including the perceived difference between the candidates (in 1976), sense of social duty, sense of attachment to relevant groups, political efficacy, resource constraints, residence, and the costs of registering (in 1976). Closeness of the election also seemed to have a significant impact in 1976.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Abramson, Paul R., and Aldrich, John H. (1982). The decline of electoral participation in America.American Political Science Review 76: 502–521.
Abramson, Paul R., and Aldrich, John H. (1984). Reply to Hill and Cassel.American Political Science Review 78: 792–794.
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Kelley, Stanley, Jr. (1975). Determinants of participation in presidential elections.Journal of Law and Economics 18: 695–733.
Barry, Brian (1970).Sociologists, Economists and Democracy. London: Macmillan.
Beck, Nathaniel (1975). The paradox of minimax regret.American Political Science Review 69: 918.
Burnham, Walter D. (1987). The turnout problem. In James Reichley (ed.),Elections American Style. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Cassel, Carol A., and Hill, David B. (1981). Explanations of turnout decline: A multivariate test.American Politics Quarterly 9: 181–195.
Center for Political Studies (1979).The American National Election Series: 1972, 1974, and 1976 (Vols. I, II, IV, V). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Chamberlain, Gary, and Rothschild, Michael (1981). A note on the probability of casting a decisive vote.Journal of Economic Theory 25: 152–162.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 37: 1–38.
Downs, Anthony (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Ferejohn, John A., and Fiorina, Morris P. (1974). The paradox of not voting: A decision theoretic analysis.American Political Science Review 68: 525–536.
Frank, Michael W., and Taber, Charles S. (1988). To vote or not to vote: Prospect theory applied to the downsian paradox. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Good, I. J., and Mayer, Lawrence S. (1975). Estimating the efficacy of a vote.Behavioral Science 20: 25–33.
Hill, David B., and Cassel, Carol A. (1983). Comment on Abramson and Aldrich.American Political Science Review 77: 1011–1012.
Katosh, John P., and Traugott, Michael W. 1981. The consequences of validated and self-reported voting measures.Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 519–535.
Katosh, John P., and Traugott, Michael W. (1982). Costs and values in the calculus of voting.American Journal of Political Science 26: 361–376.
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Page, Benjamin I. (1985). Why people vote. Proposal to the National Science Foundation.
Miller, Nicholas B. (1986). Public choice and the theory of voting: A survey.Annual Review of Political Science 1: 1–36.
Niemi, Richard G. (1976). Costs of voting and non-voting.Public Choice 27: 115–119.
Owen, Guillermo, and Grofman, Bernard (1984). To vote or not to vote: The paradox of nonvoting.Public Choice 42: 311–325.
Palfrey, Thomas R., and Rosenthal, Howard (1983). A strategic calculus of voting.Public Choice 41: 7–53.
Petrocik, John R. (1974). An analysis of intransitivities in the index of partisan identification.Political Methodology 1: 31–47.
Piven, Francis Fox, and Cloward, Richard A. (1988).Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon Books.
Powell, G. Bingham (1986). American voter turnout in comparative perspective.American Political Science Review 80: 17–43.
Powell, Linda W. (1979). A bayesian approach to a sequential three-decision problem: Voting and the uses of information in electoral choice.Journal of Mathematical Sociology 6: 177–198.
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting.American Political Science Review 62: 25–42.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Wolfinger, Raymond E. (1978). The effect of registration laws on voter turnout.American Political Science Review 72: 22–45.
Schwartz, Thomas (1987). Your vote counts on account of the way it's counted: An institutional solution to the paradox of not voting.Public Choice 54: 101–121.
Squire, Peverill, Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Glass, David P. (1987). Residential mobility and voter turnout.American Political Science Review 81: 45–65.
Stigler, George J., and Becker, Gary S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum.American Economic Review 67: 76–90.
Strom, Gerald S. 1975. On the apparent paradox of participation: A new proposal.American Political Science Review 69: 908–913.
Taber, Charles S., and Frank, Michael W. (1989). The breakdown of the big-bang theory: Evidence against consumptive models of voting. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J. (1980).Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moon, D. The determinants of turnout in presidential elections: An integrative model accounting for information. Polit Behav 14, 123–140 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992238
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992238
Keywords
- Integrative Model
- Economic Factor
- Resource Constraint
- Presidential Election
- Panel Study