Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 241–253 | Cite as

The influence of student problems on student withdrawal decisions: An autopsy on “autopsy” studies

  • John M. Braxton
  • Ellen M. Brier
  • Donald Hossler
Article

Abstract

The influence of student problems, which are often cited by students as reasons for withdrawal, is compared with the influence of constructs derived from Tinto's student attrition model. The findings suggest that data from post-hoc attrition studies should be used cautiously.

Keywords

Education Research Student Problem Student Attrition Attrition Study Withdrawal Decision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beal, P. E., and Noel, L. (1980).What Works in Student Retention. Iowa City, IA: American Council on Testing and National Center for Educational Management Systems.Google Scholar
  2. Bean, J. P. (1982). Conceptual models of student attrition: how theory can help the institutional researcher. In E. T. Pascarella (ed.),Studying Student Attrition: New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 36. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Bean, J. P. (1983). The application of a model of turnover in work organizations to the student attrition process.Review of Higher Education 12: 155–182.Google Scholar
  4. Eckland, B. (1964). College dropouts who come back.Harvard Educational Review 34: 402–420.Google Scholar
  5. Fishbein, J., and Ajzen, I. (1975).Belief, Attitude, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Lenning, O. T., Sauer, K. K., and Beal, P. E. (1980).Student Retention Strategies. AAHE/ERIC Higher Education Research Report Series, No. 8. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  7. Munro, B. (1981). Dropouts from higher education: path analysis of a national sample.American Educational Research Journal 81: 133–141.Google Scholar
  8. Pascarella, E. T., and Chapman, D. W. (1983). A multiinstitutional, path analytic validation of Tinto's model of college withdrawal.American Educational Research Journal 2: 87–102.Google Scholar
  9. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. (1980). Predicting persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model.Journal of Higher Education 51: 60–75.Google Scholar
  10. Ramist, L. (1981).College Student Attrition and Retention. The Board Report, No. 81-1. New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
  11. Rootman, I. (1972). Voluntary withdrawal from a total adult socialization organization: a model.Sociology of Education 45: 258–270.Google Scholar
  12. Terenzini, P. T. (1982). Designing attrition studies. In E. T. Pascarella (ed.),Studying Student Attrition: New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 36. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., Theophilodes, C., and Lorang, W. G. (1985). A replication of a path analytic validation of Tinto's theory of college student attrition.Review of Higher Education 8: 319–340.Google Scholar
  14. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research.Review of Educational Research 45: 89–125.Google Scholar
  15. Tinto, V. (1986). Theories of student departure revisited. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. II, pp. 359–384. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Young, M. E., and Reyes, P. (1987). Conceptualizing enrollment behavior: the effect of student financial aid.The Journal of Student Financial Aid 17: 41–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. Braxton
    • 1
  • Ellen M. Brier
    • 2
  • Donald Hossler
    • 3
  1. 1.Higher/Postsecondary Education ProgramSyracuse UniversitySyracuse
  2. 2.SUNY Health Sciences CenterUSA
  3. 3.Donald HosslerIndiana UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations