Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudinal and consequential expectancies in behavioral decision making

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the degree to which persons distinguish between what are termed “attitudinal” and “distant consequence” expectancies, the conditions under which consequential expectancies predict behavior, and the effects of conflicting attitudinal and consequential expectancies. Attitudinal expectancies are beliefs about the immediate hedonic outcomes of behaving; consequential expectancies are beliefs about distant, nonsocially mediated behavioral outcomes. A simulation experiment was conducted in which, in a 3×3 design, subjects either were or were not given attitudinal and consequential information about hypothetical behaviors that either favored or did not favor performing the behaviors. A second experiment extended the first by using a real rather than a hypothetical decision dilemma and by manipulating attitudinal (and social support) versus consequential expectancies in a 2×3 design. The results of the two studies were nearly identical in supporting the attitude-distant consequence distinction and in demonstrating that consequential considerations are an important antecedent of behavioral decisions. The implications of these findings and of the expectancy theory/decision-making approach to the development of a broad theory of action are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. Attitudinal vs. normative messages: An investigation of the differential effects of persuasive communications on behavior.Sociometry 1971,34 263–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. The prediction of behavioral intentions in a choice situation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1969,5 400–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,21 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M.Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment.Psychological Review 1970,78 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkin, R. M. Self-presentation. In O. Wegner & R. Valicher (Eds.),The self in social psychology. London: Oxford University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, B. J.Role theory: Expectations, identities and behaviors. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. The nature of attitudes and their relationships to behavior. In R. Petty, T. Ostrom, & T. Brock (Eds.),Cognitive responses in persuasion: A test in attitude change. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, A. P.The relationship between behavioral intention, attitude toward the behavior and normative beliefs about the behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1968.

  • DeVries, D. L., & Ajzen, I. The relationship of attitudes and normative beliefs to cheating in college.Journal of Social Psychology 1971,83 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice.Annual Review of Psychology 1981,32 53–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency: An information processing analysis.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1978,4 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrenya, W. K., Jr., & Arkin, R. M. The effect of commitment on expectancy value and expectancy weight in social decision making.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1979,5 86–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,36 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J. Attitude and behavior: Implications of attitudes toward behavioral alternatives.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1981,17 286–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. A.Decision making. New York: Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanouse, D. E., & Hanson, L. R., Jr. Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.),Attributions: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, K. J., & Fishbein, M. The source of beliefs, their saliency, and prediction of attitude.Journal of Social Psychology 1969,78 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. C. Further thoughts on the processes of compliance, identification, and internalization. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.),Perspectives in social power. Chicago: Aldine, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorita, S. S., & Bass, A. R. Attitude differentiation and evaluation scales of the semantic differential.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1967,6 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingle, J. H., & Ostrom, T. M. Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979,37 180–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. G., Jr. Why additive utility models fail as descriptors of choice behavior.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1979,15 397–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. G., & Cohen, J. L. The use of subjective expected utility theory as an aid to understanding variables that influence helping behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978,36 1138–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. An introduction to the theory and measurement of influence.American Political Science Review 1955,49 431–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miniard, P. W., & Cohen, J. B. An examination of the Fishbein-Ajzen behavioral-intentions model's concepts and measures.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1981,17 309–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. Cognitive appraisal and transformations in self-control. In B. Weiner (Ed.),Cognitive views of human motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R., & Biglan, A. Instrumentality theories: Current uses in psychology.Psychological Review 1971,79 432–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, F., & Wasserman, W.Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. Range-frequency compromise in judgment.Psychological Monographs, 1963,77(2).

  • Parsons, T.The social system. New York: Free Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Heesacker, M. Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981,40 432–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price-Williams, D. R., & Ramirez, M., III. Ethnic differences in delay of gratification.Journal of Social Psychology 1974,93 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. Normative explanation of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1973,9 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowtiz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Tessler, R. C. A test of a model for reducing measured attitude-behavior discrepancies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,24 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Songer-Nocks, E. Situational factors affecting the weighting of predictor components in the Fishbein model.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1976,12 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A. Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, A. W. An examination of the “other variables” explanation of attitude-behavior inconsistency.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,19 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S., & Carlston, D. E.Social cognition, inference, and attribution. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gabrenya, W.K., Biddle, B.J. Attitudinal and consequential expectancies in behavioral decision making. Motiv Emot 6, 1–30 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992134

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992134

Keywords

Navigation