Skip to main content
Log in

PASS, an alternative method of teaching introductory psychology

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new teaching method based on positively reinforcing attempts at mastery was introduced and empirically tested to determine its validity. The program, labeled Programmed Achievement Study System (PASS), makes use of traditional learning principles by providing rewards (bonus points) contingent upon reaching specified mastery criteria. Specifically, college students enrolled in introductory psychology were awarded additional points if they demonstrated mastery of concept areas on retake quizzes administered during a given week. PASS students, as compared to a control condition, demonstrated higher performance on a final examination given at the end of the semester. These results suggest that the PASS contingencies are preferable to those contingencies operating in more traditional classrooms. A theoretical rationale based on the principles of operant conditioning is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Haddad, N. F., Nation, J. R., and Williams, J. D. Programmed student achievement: A Hawthorne effect?Research in Higher Education 1975,3 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S. “Good-bye, teacher...”Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1968,1 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S. Ten years of personalized instruction.Teaching of Psychology 1974,1 (1), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. M., Williams, J. D., and Jardon, J. The effects of contingency avoidance on programmed student achievement.Research in Higher Education 1975,3 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberth, J., and Knight, J. M. An embarrassment of riches: Effectively teaching and motivating large introductory psychology sections.Teaching of Psychology 1974,1 (1), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, J. R., Knight, J. M., Lamberth, J., and Dyck, D. G. Programmed student achievement: A test of the avoidance hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Education 1974,42 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, J. R., and Roop, S. S. A comparison of two mastery approaches to teaching introductory psychology.Teaching of Psychology 1975,2 (3), 108–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, W. M.Introductory psychology: A mastery coursebook with performance objectives. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. L.Operant learning: procedures for changing behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nation, J.R., Bourgeois, A.E. PASS, an alternative method of teaching introductory psychology. Res High Educ 8, 273–282 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992091

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992091

Key words

Navigation