Abstract
A review of relevant research shows that many studies have found the academic rank, age, and extent of instructional experience of college teachers to be unrelated to their students' global evaluation of them. Yet many other studies have found these indicators of the teacher's seniority and instructional experience to be related to the overall evaluation of teachers, and with a consistent pattern. In this latter group of studies, the teacher's academic rank is positively associated with the overall evaluation of the teacher, whereas both the teacher's age and extent of instructional experience are inversely associated with overall evaluation. Although these associations are generally weak in strength, they are robust enough to hold under a variety of controls (including the size of course enrollment and the gender of the teacher). Also, at least for extent of instructional experience, the number and strength of the associations may be underestimated by considering the relationship in question as linear when in fact it may be curvilinear. Just as the teachers' age and extent of instructional experience in general have been either not related or inversely related to the global evaluation of teachers, so they have been for more specific evaluations of teachers. When academic rank has been found to be related to specific evaluations, the relationships tend to be positive for only certain specific rating dimensions while being inverse for others. This being so, it is puzzling that the associations that have been found between academic rank and global evaluations have generally been positive only. A possible explanation for this is offered and supportive evidence marshaled. Finally, several reasons why associations between any of the indicators of seniority or instructional experience and either specific or overall evaluations may be inverse, positive, or curvilinear in the first place are advanced. These hinge on such factors as the teacher's motivation and career circumstances, the pedagogical training and abilities of different cohorts of teachers, as well as the criteria and practices of colleges in their recruitment of teachers, the extent of an age (or generation) gap between students and teachers, and students' expectations and perceptions of teachers and pedagogical characteristics attributed to them. Those reasons having the greater support empirically as well as those that seem the most plausible are noted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, H. L. Favorable student evaluation as a function of instructor's age.Improving College and University Teaching 1973,21 72.
Ahern, J. Characteristics of teachers who have received an “outstanding teacher” award from New England institutions of higher education in the five-year period beginning with the academic year 1963–64. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 1969.
Aiken, L. R., Jr. Procedures and problems in designing a college course evaluation questionnaire.College and University 1975,50 247–253.
Aleamoni, L. M. The Illinois course evaluation questionnaire: manual of interpretation (rev.). Research Rep. No. 331. Urbana-Champaign, Ill.: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois, 1972.
Aleamoni, L. M., and Graham, M. H. The relationship between CEQ ratings and instructor's rank, class size, and course level.Journal of Educational Measurement 1974,11 189–202.
Aleamoni, L. M., and Thomas, G. A. Is the instructor's rating of the class related to the class' rating of the instructor? Research Rep. No. 1. Tucson, Ariz.: Office of Instructional Research and Development, University of Arizona, 1977.
Aleamoni, L. M., and Yimer, M. An investigation of the relationship between colleague rating, student rating, research productivity, and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness.Journal of Educational Psychology 1973,64 274–277.
Aleamoni, L. M., and Yimer, M. Graduating senior ratings relationship to colleague rating, student rating, research productivity and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness. Research Rep. No. 352. Urbana-Champaign, Ill.: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois, 1974.
Barnoski, R. P., and Sockloff, A. L. A validation of the faculty and course evaluation (FACE) instrument.Educational and Psychological Measurement 1976,36 391–400.
Bausell, R. B., and Magoon, J. The validation of student ratings of instruction: An institutional research model. Newark, Del.: College of Education, University of Delaware, 1972.
Blount, H. P., Stallings, W. M., and Gupta, V. The effects of different instructions on student ratings of university courses and teachers.Journal of Educational Research 1978,71 149–152.
Brandenburg, D. C., and Aleamoni, L. M. Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ): Results interpretation manual, Form 73. Urbana, Ill.: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois, 1976.
Brandenburg, D. C., Slinde, J. A., and Batista, E. E. Student ratings of instruction: validity and normative interpretations.Research in Higher Education 1977,7 67–78.
Braskamp, L. A., Ory, J. C., and Pieper, D. M. Student written comments: dimensions of instructional quality. Research Rep. No. 368. Urbana, Ill.: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois, 1979.
Brown, D. L. Faculty ratings and student grades: A university-wide multiple regression analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology 1976,68 573–578.
Carroll, J. G. Effects of training programs for university teaching assistants: A review of empirical research.Journal of Higher Education 1980,51 167–183.
Cashin, W. E., and Slawson, H. M. IDEA technical report no. 2: Description of data base, 1976–77. Manhattan, Kan.: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development in Higher Education, 1977.
Centra, J. A. Two studies on the utility of student ratings for improving teaching: I. The effectiveness of student feedback in modifying college instruction. II. Self-ratings of college teachers: A comparison with student ratings. SIR Rep. No. 2, Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1972.
Centra, J. A. The student instructional report: comparisons with alumni ratings; item reliabilities; the factor structures. SIR Rep. No. 3. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1973.
Centra, J. A., and Creech, F. R. The relationship between student, teacher, and course characteristics and student ratings of teacher effectiveness. PR-76-1. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1976.
Choy, C., The relationship of college teacher effectiveness to conceptual systems orientation and perceptual orientation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State College, 1969.
Clark, K. E., and Keller, R. J. Student ratings of college teaching. In R. E. Eckert and R. J. Keller (Eds.),A university looks at its program: The report of the University of Minnesota Bureau of Institutional Research, 1942–1952. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1954.
Clark, M. J. Organizational stress and professional performance among faculty members at a small college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1973.
Cohen, P. A., Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings.Research in Higher Education 1980,13 321–341.
Colliver, J. A. A report on student evaluation of faculty teaching performance at Sangamon State University. Technical Paper No. 1. Springfield, Ill.: Division of Academic Affairs, Office of the Vice President, Sangamon State University, 1972.
Cook, V., Gillmore, G. Hodgson, T. F., and Tomandl, D. The training and effectiveness of graduate student teaching assistants. Prepared for the Committee on Evaluation and Improvement of Teaching by the Subcommittee on the Effectiveness of Graduate Student Teaching Assistants. Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington, 1975.
Cornwell, C. D. Statistical treatment of data from student teaching evaluation questionnaires.Journal of Chemical Education 1974,51 155–160.
Daflucas, C. G. Development of a checklist of selected activities judged of value in preparing university teachers and their relationship to teaching effectiveness as measured by the Purdue Rating Scale for Instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1974.
Delaney, E. L. The relationships of student ratings of instruction to student, instructor and course characteristics. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1976. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 126 140)
Delaney, E. L., Jr. The influence of teaching experience and instructional development activities on student ratings of instruction obtained by beginning professors at a large university. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1977.
Delaney, E. L., Jr., and Kojaku, L. K. The influence of teaching experience and instructional development activities on student ratings of instruction obtained by beginning university professors. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1977.
Dent, P. L., and Lewis, D. J. The relationship between teaching effectiveness and measures of research quality.Educational Research Quarterly 1976,1 3–16.
Downie, N. M. Student evaluation of faculty.Journal of Higher Education 1952,23 495–496; 503.
Eagle, N. Studies in the reliability and validity of a community college student rating of instruction questionnaire.Community/Junior College Research Quarterly 1977,1 303–314.
Elliott, D. N. Characteristics and relationships of various criteria of college and university teaching.Purdue University Studies in Higher Education 1950,70 5–61.
Elmore, P. G., and LaPointe, K. A. Effects of teacher sex and student sex on the evaluation of college instructors.Journal of Educational Psychology 1974,66 386–389.
Elmore, P. B., and LaPointe, K. A. Effect of teacher sex, student sex, and teacher warmth on the evaluation of college instructors.Journal of Educational Psychology 1975,67 368–374.
Elmore, P. B., and Pohlmann, J. T. Effect of teacher, student, and class characteristics on the evaluation of college instructors. Technical Rep. 2.1-76. Carbondale, Ill.: Student Affairs Research and Evaluation Center, Southern Illinois University, 1976.
Elmore, P. B., and Pohlmann, J. T. Effect of teacher, student, and class characteristics on the evaluation of college instructors.Journal of Educational Psychology 1978,70 187–192.
Feldman, K. A. Grades and college students' evaluations of their courses and teachers.Research in Higher Education 1976,4 69–111. (a)
Feldman, K. A. The superior college teacher from the students' view.Research in Higher Education 1976,5 243–288. (b)
Feldman, K. A. Consistency and variability among college students in rating their teachers and courses: A review and analysis.Research in Higher Education 1977,6 223–274.
Feldman, K. A. Course characteristics and college students' ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don't.Research in Higher Education 1978,9 199–242.
Feldman, K. A. The significance of circumstances for college students' ratings of their teachers and courses.Research in Higher Education 1979,10 149–172.
Freedman, R. D., and Stumpf, S. A. Student evaluations of courses and faculty based on a perceived learning criterion: Scale construction, validation, and comparison.Applied Psychological Measurement 1978,2 189–202.
Freedman, R. D., Stumpf, S. A., and Aguanno, J. C. Validity of the Course-Faculty Instrument (CFI): Intrinsic and extrinsic variables.Educational and Psychological Measurement 1979,39 153–159.
Frey, P. W. A two-dimensional analysis of student ratings of instruction.Research in Higher Education 1978,9 69–91.
Friedman, C. P., and Morrison, J. L. Community college faculty socialization experiences, educational orientations, and perceived teaching effectiveness. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1977.
Gage, N. L. The appraisal of college teaching: An analysis of ends and means.Journal of Higher Education 1971,32 17–22.
Goldsmid, C. A., Gruber, J. E., and Wilson, E. K. Perceived attributes of superior teachers (PAST): An inquiry into the giving of teacher awards.American Educational Research Journal 1977,14 423–440.
Grant, C. W. Faculty allocation of effort and student course evaluations.Journal of Educational Research 1971,64 405–410.
Guthrie, E. R.The Evaluation of Teaching: A Progress Report. Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington, 1954.
Hanke, J. E. Teacher and student perceptions as predictors of college teacher effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, 1970.
Hayes, J. R. Research, teaching, and faculty fate.Science 1971,172 227–230.
Heilman, J. D., and Armentrout, W. D. The rating of college teachers on ten traits by their students.Journal of Educational Psychology 1936,27 197–216.
Hildebrand, M., Wilson, R. C., and Dienst, E. R.Evaluating University Teaching. Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education, University of California at Berkeley, 1971.
Hillery, J. M., and Yukl, G. A. Convergent and discriminant validation of student ratings of college instructors. Paper read at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, 1971.
Holzemer, W. L. Student ratings of instructional effectiveness and their relationship to the college classroom environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1975.
Hubbard, A. M. A study of faculty and teaching assistant characteristics and student ratings of instruction in a minicourse program at Syracuse University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1976.
Hudiburg, G. E. The relationship of degrees held by college instructors and teaching effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas, 1965.
Katz, D. A. Faculty salaries, promotions, and productivity at a large university.American Economic Review 1970,63 469–477.
King, A. P. The self-concept and self-actualization of university faculty in relation to student perceptions of effective teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, 1971.
Lasher, H., and Vogt, K. Student evaluation: Myths and realities.Improving College and University Teaching 1974,22 267–269.
Linsky, A. S., and Straus, M. Student evaluations, research productivity, and eminence of college faculty.Journal of Higher Education 1975,46 89–102.
Marsh, H. W. The relationship between background variables and students' evaluations of instructional quality. OIS 76–9. Los Angeles, Calif.: Office of Institutional Studies, University of Southern California, 1976. (a)
Marsh, H. W. Students' evaluations of instructional quality, Division of Social Sciences, 1975–76: A summary of research. OIS 76–13. Los Angeles, Calif.: Office of Institutional Studies, University of Southern California, 1976. (b)
Marsh, H. W. The validity of students' evaluations: Classroom evaluations of instructors independently nominated as best or worst teachers by graduating seniors.American Educational Research Journal 1977,14 441–447.
Marsh, H. W. The influence of student course, and instructor characteristics in evaluations of university teaching.American Educational Research Journal 1980,17 219–237.
Marsh, H. W. Factors affecting students' evaluations of the same course taught by the same instructor on different occasions.American Educational Research Journal 1982,19 485–497.
Marsh, H. W., and Overall, J. W. Validity of students' evaluations of teaching: A comparison with instructor self evaluations by teaching assistants, undergraduate faculty and graduate faculty. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1979. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 205)
Marsh, H. W., Overall, J. U., and Thomas, C. S. The relationship between student evaluations of instruction and expected grade. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1976. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 126 140)
McCarbery, R. J. The relationship of selected factors to ratings of community college teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1970.
McDaniel, E. D., and Feldhusen, J. F. Relationships between faculty ratings and indexes of service and scholarship.Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association 1970,5 619–620.
Metz, J. F., Jr. A study of the relationship between student evaluation of teaching and selected faculty characteristics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1970.
Mintzes, J. J. Field test and validation of a teaching evaluation instrument: The Student Opinion Survey of Teaching. A report submitted to the Senate Committee for Teaching and Learning, Faculty Senate, University of Windsor. Windsor, Ontario: University of Windsor, 1976–77.
Morgenstern, R. E. The relationship between two modes of interpersonal conditions and college teacher effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State College, 1969.
Morrison, J. L. Student assessment of faculty: Implications for instructional development. Unpublished manuscript, n.d.
Morrison, J. L., and Friedman, C. P. Community college faculty attitudes, socialization experiences, and perceived teaching effectiveness.Community/Junior College Research Quarterly 1978,2 119–138.
Morrow, J. R., Jr. The effects of response position and item simplicity on the factorial structure of teacher evaluation forms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, 1976.
Nation, J. R., LeUnes, A. D., and Gray, M. Student evaluations of teaching as a function of academic rank.Teaching of Psychology 1976,3 186–187.
Nevill, D. D., Ware, W. B., and Smith, A. B. A comparison of student ratings of teaching assistants and faculty members.American Educational Research Journal 1978,15 25–37.
Nichols, M. G. A study of the influences of selected variables involved in student evaluations of teacher effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Dakota, 1967.
Potter, E. L. The relationship of teacher training and teaching experience to assessment of teaching performance of community/junior college faculty.Journal of Educational Research 1978,72 81–85.
Ratz, H. C. Factors in the evaluation of instructors by students.IEEE Transactions on Education 1975,E-18 122–127.
Rayder, N. F. College student ratings of instructors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State College, 1967.
Rayder, N. F. College student ratings of instructors.Journal of Experimental Education 1968,37 76–81.
Remmers, H. H. The college professor as the student sees him.Bulletin of Purdue University, 192929 (6, Purdue University Studies in Higher Education, No. 11).
Riley, J. W., Jr., Ryan, B. F., and Lifshitz, M.The Student Looks at His Teacher: An Inquiry into the Implications of Student Ratings at the College Level. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1950.
Rossman, J. E. Teaching, publication, and rewards at a liberal arts college.Improving College and University Teaching 1976,24 238–240.
Ryans, D. G. Prediction of teacher effectiveness. In C. W. Harris (Ed.),Encyclopedia of educational research (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1960 Pp. 1486–1491.
Schwab, D. P.Manual for the Course Evaluation Instrument. Madison, Wis.: Graduate School of Business and Industrial Relations Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1976.
Scott, C. S. Correlates of student ratings of professorial performance: Instructor defined extenuating circumstances, class size, and faculty member's professional experience and willingness to publish results. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1975.
Siegfried, J. J., and White, K. J. Teaching and publishing as determinants of academic salaries.Journal of Economic Education 1973,4 90–99.
Singhal, S., and Stallings, W. M. A study of the relationships between course evaluations by students and severity of grading by instructors in freshman rhetoric at the University of Illinois. Research Rep. No. 252. Urbana-Champaign, Ill.: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois, n.d.
Sockloff, A. L., and Deabler, V. T. The construction of the faculty and course evaluation instrument. Research Rep. 71-2 Philadelphia, Penn.: Testing Bureau, Temple University, 1971.
South, J. D., II. The relationship of instructor role orientation and perceived teaching effectiveness in selected Pennsylvania community colleges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1975.
South, J. D., Hill, M. D., and Morrison, J. L. Faculty role orientation and perceived effectiveness: The case of an intervening variable.Research in Higher Education 1979,11 99–110.
Spencer, R. E. Some dimensions of the Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire. Research Rep. No. 303. Urbana-Champaign, Ill.: Measurement and Research Division, Office of Instructional Resources, University of Illinois, 1969.
Stallings, W. M., and Singhal, S. Some observations on the relationship between research productivity and student evaluations of courses and teaching.American Sociologist 1970,5 141–143.
Stuit, D. B., and Ebel, R. L. Instructor rating at a large state university.College and University 1952,27 247–254.
Van Horn, C. An analysis of the 1968 course and instructor evaluation report. Institutional Research Bulletin No. 2–68. West Lafayette, Ind.: Measurement and Research Center, Purdue University, 1968.
Vecchio, R., and Costin, F. Predicting teacher effectiveness from graduate admissions predictors.American Educational Research Journal 1977,14 169–176.
Villano, M. W. The relationship of certain course characteristics to student ratings of science and mathematics teaching at four-year and two-year colleges. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1975.
Villano, M. W., Rosenstock, E. H., and Estes, C. A decade with a student course evaluation form at a major university. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1974.
Walker, B. D. An investigation of selected variables relative to the manner in which a population of junior college students evaluate their teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, 1968.
Weerts, R. R., and Whitney, D. R. The effect of student, course, and instructor characteristics on types of items used in student evaluation of instruction. Paper read at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, 1975. (a)
Weerts, R. R., and Whitney, D. R. Student perceptions of teaching (SPOT): V. Relationships between averaged student responses and selected course characteristics. Research Rep. No. 78. Iowa City, Iowa: Evaluation and Examination Service, University of Iowa, 1975.(b)
Widlak, F. W., McDaniel, E. D., and Feldhusen, J. F. Factor analysis of an instructor rating scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1973.
Williams, H. Y., Jr. College students' perceptions of the personal traits and instructional procedures of good and poor teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1965.
Wilson, D., and Doyle, K. O., Jr. Student ratings of instruction: Student and instructor sex interactions.Journal of Higher Education 1976,47 465–470.
Wilson, R. C., Gaff, J. G., Dienst, E. R., Wood, L., and Bavry, J. L.College Professors and Their Impact on Students. New York: Wiley, 1975.
Wilson, W. P. Students rating teachers.Journal of Higher Education 1932,3 75–82.
Wood, N. J., and De Lorme, C. D., Jr. An investigation of the relationship among teaching evaluation, research and ability.Journal of Economic Education 1976,2 77–80.
Wood, P. H. The description and evaluation of a college department's faculty rating system. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1977.
Wood, P. H. Student and peer ratings of college teaching and peer ratings of research and service: Four years of departmental evaluation. Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feldman, K.A. Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students. Res High Educ 18, 3–124 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992080
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992080