Skip to main content
Log in

A study of the validity of four types of student ratings of college teaching assessed on a criterion of student achievement gains

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate relationships between student ratings of college teaching using four types of student rating instruments and pre- vs. post-student achievement gains in 36 sections of an undergraduate analytic geometry and calculus course. Student rating instruments used varied according to type of items (high vs. low inference) and focus (students rating their own perceived growth vs. rating the instructor). Data were collected on 799 students (66% freshmen; 16% sophomore; and 15% juniors) at the University of Florida, and relationships were analyzed using the Pearson product-moment correlation technique. Significant relationships were not found between student ratings and student achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barr, A. S. et al. (1961). “Wisconsin Studies of Measurement and Prediction of Teacher Effectiveness: A Summary of Investigations.” Madison: Dembar Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, S. M. (1970). “An approach to developing accountability measures for the public schools.” Phi Delta Kappa 52:196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. A. (1973). The student as godfather? The impact of student ratings on academia. Educational Researcher 2:4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. M., and Neville, K. F. (1971). “The Faculty as Teachers: A Perspective on Evaluation.” Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, report 13 (ED-0540392; AA-727).

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, F., Greenough, W. T., and Menges, R. J. (1971). Student ratings of college teaching: Reliability, validity and usefulness. Review of Educational Research 41:511–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., and Furby, L. (1970). How do we measure change — or should we? Psychological Bulletin 74:68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. H. (1969). Student Instructional Rating System (SIRS). Technical Bulletin, East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University, Office of Evaluation Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, K. O. (1975). “Student Evaluation of Instruction.” Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gessner, P. K. (1973). Evaluation of Instruction. Science 180:566–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, G. E. et al. (1973). Student evaluation of college teaching behaviors instrument: A factor analysis. Journal of Higher Education 44:596–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, T., and Hartley, E. (1972). Some additional factors in student evaluation of courses. American Educational Research Journal 9:241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howsam, R. B. (1960). Who's a good teacher? Problems and progress in teacher evaluation. California Teachers Association.

  • Justiz, T. B. (1969). A reliable measure of teacher effectiveness. Educational Leadership Research Supplement 3:49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuigan, F. J. (1974). Amount learned: An empirical basis for grading teachers and students. Teaching of Psychology 1:10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, T. (1966). Some methodological considerations and a report of some research findings concerning course and/or teacher evaluations by students. Champaign: University of Illinois, Office of Instructional Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1972). Student evaluations keyed to function. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Convention, Chicago.

  • McKeachie, W. J., Lins, Y., and Mann, W. (1971). Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: validity studies. American Educational Research Journal 8:435–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, J. D. (1967). Concomitants of using behavioral objectives in the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Education 36:69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. I. (1972). “Evaluating Faculty Performance.” Washington: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsh, J. E., and Wilder, E. W. (1954). Identifying the effective instructor: a review of quantitative studies. Res. Bull. no. AFPTRC-TR-54-44 San Antonio: USAF Personnel Training Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmers, H. H., and Elliott, D. (1927). Manual of the rating scale for instruction. West Lafayette, Indiana: University Book Store.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, B., and Rodin, M. (1972). Student evaluations of teachers. Science 177:1164–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B. (1971). New directions for research on teaching. Paper presented at conference “How Teachers Make a Difference” (Smith, B. O., ed.). Washington, D.C.

  • Tomlinson, L. R. (1955). Recent studies in the evaluation of teaching. Educational Research Bulletin 34:172–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. L., and Thompson, R. P. (1974). Relationships and residual learning. Paper presented at the 1974 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.

  • Ware, J. E., Jr., and Williams, R. G. (1975). The Dr. Fox effect: A study of lecturer effectiveness and ratings of instruction. Journal of Medical Education 50:149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whily, S. E., and Doyle, Jr., K. O. (1973). Student ratings and criteria for effective teaching. Minneapolis, Minnesota, Measurement Services Center, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenwood, G.E., Hazelton, A., Smith, A.B. et al. A study of the validity of four types of student ratings of college teaching assessed on a criterion of student achievement gains. Res High Educ 5, 171–178 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992010

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992010

Key Words

Navigation