Research in Higher Education

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 159–170 | Cite as

Perceptions of faculty evaluation in the soft sciences: A case study

  • Lawrence R. Jauch
  • James W. Gentry
Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

There has been considerable debate on the evaluation of faculty performance by administrators. Much of the research has focused on the “publish or perish” issue on a university-wide basis rather than considering differences between disciplines which might invalidate the effectiveness of a global evaluation policy. This paper is a case study of three areas (Business, Psychology, and Sociology/Anthropology) at Kansas State University. Significant differences were found in the orientations of the different areas and in the criteria that are being used and that should be used (according to the respondents) for performance evaluation. Despite the significant differences in the departments' orientations, all of the faculty tended to agree strongly that teaching should be an important evaluative criterion.

Key words

evaluation administration research teaching 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biglan, A. (1971). Relationships between the Characteristics of Academic Tasks and the Structure and Output of University Departments. Department of Psychology Technical Report. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  2. Biglan, A., Oncken, G. R., and Fiedler, F. E. (1971). Convergence Among Academic Outputs as a Function of Academic Area. Organizational Research, Department of Psychology. Seattle: University of Washington, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Chase, J. M. (1970). Normative Criteria for Scientific Publication. The American Sociologist, 5:262–265.Google Scholar
  4. Gamson, Z. F. (1966). Utilitarian and Normative Orientations toward Education. Sociology of Education, 39:46–73.Google Scholar
  5. Glueck, W. F., and Jauch, L. R. (1975). Sources of Ideas Among Productive Scholars: Implications for Administrators. Journal of Higher Education, 46:103–114.Google Scholar
  6. Hammond, P. E., Meyer, J. W., and Miller, D. (1969). Teaching Versus Research: Sources of Misperception. Journal of Higher Education, 40:682–690.Google Scholar
  7. Harry, J., and Goldner, N. S. (1972). The Null Relationship Between Teaching and Research. Sociology of Education, 45:47–60.Google Scholar
  8. Hayes, J. (1971). Research, Teaching, and Faculty Fate. Science, 172:227–230.Google Scholar
  9. Hexter, J. H. (1964). Publish or Perish — A Defense. The Public Interest, 17:60–77.Google Scholar
  10. Hilgert, R. L. (1964). Teacher or Researcher? The Educational Forum, 28:463–468.Google Scholar
  11. Hoyt, D. P. (1974). Interrelationships Among Instructional Effectiveness, Publication Record, and Monetary Reward. Research in Higher Education, 2:81–88.Google Scholar
  12. Hoyt, D. P. and Spangler, R. K. (1974). “Faculty Research Involvement and Instructional Outcomes,” Manhattan, Kansas: Kansas State University; Office of Educational Research.Google Scholar
  13. Jauch, L. R. (1973). Evaluation of Research in a University. (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri).Google Scholar
  14. Jauch, L. R., and Glueck, W. F. (forthcoming). Evaluation of University Professors' Research Performance, Management Science.Google Scholar
  15. Martin, T. W., and Berry, K. J. (1969). The Teaching-Research Dilemma: Its Sources in the University Setting. Journal of Higher Education, 40:691–703.Google Scholar
  16. McDaniel, E. D., and Feldhusen, J. F. (1970). Relationships Between Faculty Ratings and Indexes of Service and Scholarship. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 5:619–620.Google Scholar
  17. Miller, R. I. (1972). Evaluating Faculty Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, R. I. (1974). Developing Programs for Faculty Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Ozmon, H. (1967). Publications and Teaching. Improving College and University Teaching, 15:106–107.Google Scholar
  20. Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Stallings, W. A., and Singhal, S. (1969). “Some Observations on the Relationship Between Research Productivity and Student Evaluations of Courses and Teaching.” Office of Instructional Resources. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  22. Voeks, V. W. (1962). Publications and Teching Effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 33:212–218.Google Scholar
  23. Vreeland, R. S., and Bidwell, C. E. (1966). Classifying University Departments: An Approach to the Analysis of Their Effects Upon Undergraduates' values and Attitudes, Sociology of Education, 38:237–254.Google Scholar
  24. Zuckerman, H., and Merton, K. (1971). Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalisation, Structure and Functions of the Referee System. Minerva, 9:66–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© APS Publications, Inc. 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence R. Jauch
    • 1
  • James W. Gentry
    • 2
  1. 1.Southern Illinois University at CarbondaleUSA
  2. 2.Kansas State UniversityManhattan

Personalised recommendations