Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 31–57 | Cite as

Concern about forecasts of national faculty shortages and the importance of local studies

  • Steve Chatman
  • Loren Jung
AIR Forum Issue

Abstract

The higher education popular press has published several forecasts of faculty shortages due to the mass retirement of expansion era faculty and the forecasted low numbers of doctoral graduates. These forecasts of national shortages encouraged a local study of faculty attrition in a four-campus university system. The local study considered two factors not accounted for in national studies but important locally: whether disciplinary field of study or campus location (urban or rural) has been associated with faculty attrition in the recent past and should therefore be considered when modeling demand for new faculty. Discipline and institution location were found to have no significant effect on the likelihood of faculty to continue employment from year to year when faculty age was controlled. Although retirement rate was expected to increase, no evidence of mass retirements producing an increased demand for new faculty was found. The lack of forecasted increases in demand for faculty locally led to reconsideration of national forecast studies, especially when it was determined that the age distribution of faculty across system campuses was similar to faculty nationwide. This paper questions whether there is sufficient evidence, as presented in the popular press, to support special action to increase the supply of faculty.

Keywords

Local Study Modeling Demand Popular Press Disciplinary Field Doctoral Graduate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Association of University Professors (1990). The annual report on the economic status of the profession, 1989–90.Academe 76(2).Google Scholar
  2. Bowen, W. G., and Sosa, J. A. (1989).Prospects for Faculty in the Arts and Sciences: A Study of Factors Affecting Demand and Supply, 1987 to 2012. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cartter, A. M. (1965). A new look at the supply of college teachers.Educational Record 46(3):267–277.Google Scholar
  4. Cartter, A. M. (1976).Ph.D.'s and the Academic Labor Market. A Report Prepared for the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  5. Chatman, S. P., and Jung, L. (1990).Forecasted Demand for Faculty: A National Shortage of Faculty? Probably Not. A Local Shortage of Faculty? Unlikely. (B&AS 90-10). Columbia: University of Missouri, Budget and Analytical Services.Google Scholar
  6. Chronicle of Higher Education (1990, September).The Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac, p. 22. Colleges should look to retired professors to cope with looming faculty shortage (January 3, 1990).Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B1–B3.Google Scholar
  7. El-Khawas, E. (1988).Campus Trends Higher Education Report Number 77. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  8. El-Khawas, E. (1989).Campus Trends, Higher Education Report Number 78. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  9. Faculty attitudes and characteristics: Results of a 1989–90 survey (May 8, 1991).The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A16–A17.Google Scholar
  10. Job market begins predicted turnaround, survey indicates: Many colleges find it difficult to fill faculty vacancies (July 25, 1990).The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A1, A11–A12.Google Scholar
  11. Lozier, G. G., and Dooris, M. J. (1987). Is higher education confronting faculty short-ages? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  12. Lozier, G. G., and Dooris, M. J. (1990). Faculty retirement projections beyond 1994: Effects of policy on individual choice. Paper presented at the American Association for Higher Education National Conference, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  13. McGuire, M. D., and Price, J. A. (1989). Faculty replacement needs for the next 15 years: A simulated attrition model. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  14. McGuire, M. D., and Price, J. A. (1990). Previewing the professorate of the 21st century: A multi-institutional analysis of faculty supply and demand. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of College and University Planners, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  15. National Academy of Sciences (1979).Research Excellence Through the Year 2000. A Report with Recommendations of the Committee on Continuity in Academic Research Performance and Commission on Human Resources of the National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  16. National Center for Education Statistics (1990).Projections of Education Statistics to 2000. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (NCES 89-648).Google Scholar
  17. National Research Council (1990).Summary Report 1989 Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Sovern, M. (1989). Higher education: The real crisis.The New York Times Magazine (January 22), p. 24ff.Google Scholar
  19. Strothman, F. W. (1955).The Graduate School Today and Tomorrow: Reflections for the Profession's Consideration. New York: Fund for the Advancement of Education.Google Scholar
  20. Universities must lead the effort to avert national shortages of Ph.D.'s (January 17, 1990).Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B1, B3.Google Scholar
  21. Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association, & The College Board (1988).High School Graduates: Projections by State, 1986 to 2004. Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  22. Wolfe, D. (1954).America's Resources of Specialized Talent. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Chatman
    • 1
  • Loren Jung
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Missouri SystemUSA
  2. 2.Budget and Analytical ServicesUniversity of MissouriColumbia

Personalised recommendations