Skip to main content
Log in

Departmental morale as a function of the perceived performance of department heads

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The object of this paper is to analyze some of the factors underlying differing levels of morale in university departments. Morale is conceived to be primarily a product of perceived department-head performance, although it is also suggested that environmental and satisfaction variables may be important. Morale is seen as a potential symptomatic attribute which might be used in diagnosing organizational difficulties. The authors did indeed find, using multiple discriminant analysis on departmentally aggregated data, that the perceived performance of department heads was more important in predicting levels of morale. In addition, department size was also found to be useful. The conclusions drawn were that morale could be used as a symptom of departmental (or organizational) well being and that such data could be useful to those managing department heads both in the selection of department heads and in their ongoing supervision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, K. J. W. (1954). Membership participation in a printing trade union. Sociological Review 2:161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartel, H., and Sobol, R. (1959). Background and organizational factors in absenteeism. Personnel Psychology 12:169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, M. L., and Naylor, J. C. (1969). “Industrial psychology: Its Theoretical and Social Foundations.” New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVries, D. L., and Snyder, J. P. (1974). Faculty participation in departmental decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 11:235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1933). “The Division of Labor in Society.” New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faunce, W. A. (1962). Size of locals and union democracy. American Journal of Sociology 68:291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J. D. (1956). “Group Dimensions: A Manual for Their Measurement.” Columbus, Ohio: Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indik, B. P. (1965). Organizational size and member participation: some empirical tests of alternative explanations. Human Relations 18:339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuitty, L. L. (1957). Elementary linkage analysis for isolating orthogonal and oblique types and typal relevancies. Educational and Psychological Measurement 17:207–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madron, T. W. (1967). “Small Group Methods and the Study of Politics.” Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P., Athanasiou R., and Head, K. B. (1969). “Measures of Occupational Attitudes and Occupational Characteristics.” Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriesheim, C., and Kerr, S. (1974). Psychometric properties of the Ohio state leadership scales. Psychological Bulletin 81:756–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1902). The number of members as determining the sociological form of the group. American Journal of Sociology 8:1–46, 158–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C., Kendall, M., and Hulin, C. L. (1969). “The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement.” Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talacchi, S. (1960). Organizational size, individual attitudes and behavior: an empirical study. Administrative Science Quarterly 5:398–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, W. K., and Hilander, J. S. (1964). The relationship between size of organization and membership participation. Rural Sociology 29:30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilken, P. H. (1971). Size or organizations and member participation in church congregations. Administrative Science Quarterly 16:173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wofford, J. C. (1971). Managerial behavior, situational factors, and productivity and morale. Administrative Science Quarterly 16:10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1971). Toward a behavioral theory of leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6:414–440.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors were designated by Western Kentucky University to supervise the collection and analysis of the data described. The data were used with the permission of the Office of the President, Western Kentucky University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madron, T.W., Craig, J.R. & Mendel, R.M. Departmental morale as a function of the perceived performance of department heads. Res High Educ 5, 83–94 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991961

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991961

Keywords

Navigation