College presidents' role performance and faculty satisfaction
- 70 Downloads
This research analyzed faculty evaluations of college presidents' role performance with the intent of identifying underlying dimensions and to ask further which dimensions predicted faculty satisfaction with presidents. Data were gathered from 896 faculty members from two technical colleges, three community colleges, two private universities and three public universities in a Western state. The factor analysis revealed three relatively independent dimensions of the presidential role: personal-public image, faculty and student interaction with presidents, and absence of autocratic leadership style. The “personal-public image” was the most important dimension and predicted faculty satisfaction across the four types of institutions of higher learning. “Faculty-student interaction with the president,” while not as important a dimension of the presidential role, predicted faculty satisfaction in three institutional types, but not in public universities. The “absence of autocratic leadership style” predicted satisfaction in community and technical colleges.
Key wordshigher education community college educational administration college presidents leadership faculty satisfaction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bennis, W. E. The University leader, used with permission. Saturday Review, 1972, p. 3.Google Scholar
- Chronicle of Higher Education. April 19, 1976, p. 1.Google Scholar
- Cohen, M. D., and March, J. G. Leadership and Ambiguity: the American College President. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974, pp. 38–39.Google Scholar
- Education. Newsweek, 1976, p. 1.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, G. P. The Old-Time College President. New York: AMS press, 1970, p. ii.Google Scholar
- Walberg, H. J. The academic president: Colleague, administrator, or spokesman? Educational Record, 1969, p. 197.Google Scholar