Abstract
Affirmative action and other efforts to combat sex discrimination in higher education have focused on rank and salary differences within institutions. Academic women, however, tend to receive relatively low pay in part because they are concentrated in the lower-paying institutions. Since multivariate controls of factors such as institutional type, control, size, selectivity, and curricular emphases do not eliminate this negative relationship, the hypothesis of a direct link between institutional pay scales and faculty sex ratios is strengthened. These results suggest that eliminating sex bias in faculty pay within individual institutions will not achieve salary parity for academic women until higher-paying institutions recruit more women faculty, or until institutions with higher proportions of women faculty upgrade their pay scales.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Astin, A. W. (1975). The myth of equal access. Chronicle of Higher Education, 11, 24.
Astin, A. W., and Henson, J. W. (1977). New measures of college selectivity. Research in Higher Education, 6, 1.
Astin, H. S. and Bayer, A. E. (1972). Sex discrimination in academe. Educational Record, 53, 101.
Bayer, A. E., and Astin, H. S. (1975). Sex differentials in the academic reward system. Science, 188, 796–802.
Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (1973). Opportunities for women in higher education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, M., Astin, A.W. Sex differentials in faculty salaries. Res High Educ 7, 289–298 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991906
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991906