Research in Higher Education

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 82–96 | Cite as

Differentiation in graduate education

  • Gary D. Malaney
Article

Abstract

This study investigates differentiation in graduate education at a large public research university, and all 114 academic units are categorized by Biglan's dimensions and by size, which is operationally defined as the number of students in the academic units. This paper represents the first effort to study the opinions of departmental managers regarding an integrating device before its implementation. Departmental and graduate studies committee chairpersons were surveyed regarding their opinions on the need for and potential use of a database system which would provide the departments with easier access to data regarding graduate education and would provide the graduate school with an easier means of monitoring departmental activities pertaining to graduate education. The results show overwhelming support for the system, and the size of the academic unit is the best predictor of support, with the larger units voicing more support.

Keywords

Graduate School Good Predictor Education Research Easy Access Database System 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biglan, A. (1973a). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas.Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 195–203.Google Scholar
  2. Biglan, A. (1973b). Relationship between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments.Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 204–213.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, P. M. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations.American Sociological Review 35(2): 201–218.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, P. M. (1973).The Organization of Academic Work. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Blau, P. M., and Schoenherr, R. (1971).The Structure of Organizations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bresser, R. K. (1983). The structure of West German university departments: differences between the physical and the social sciences.Research in Higher Education 19(1): 83–108.Google Scholar
  7. Bresser, R. K. (1984). The contexts of university departments: Differences between fields of higher and lower levels of paradigm development.Research in Higher Education 20(1): 3–15.Google Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. W., and Bean, J. P. (1981). Research output, socialization, and the Biglan model.Research in Higher Education 15(1): 69–91.Google Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W., and Roskens, R. W. (1981). The Biglan studies of differences among academic areas.The Review of Higher Education 4: 1–16.Google Scholar
  10. Creswell, J. W., Seagren, A. T., and Henry, T. C. (1979). Professional development training needs of departmental chairmen: a test of the Biglan model.Planning and Changing 10: 234–237.Google Scholar
  11. Eison, C. L. (1976). The measurement of job satisfaction and departmental association at Western Kentucky University: testing the Holland and Bigland models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  12. Kuhn, T. S. (1962).The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lawrence, P. R., and Lorsch, J. W. (1967a). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 1–47.Google Scholar
  14. Lawrence, P. R., and Lorsch, J. W. (1967b).Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  15. Lolli, A. (1984). A model for user-directed development of student information systems.College and University 59(3): 203–216.Google Scholar
  16. Muffo, J. A., and Langston, I. W. (1981). Biglan's dimensions: are the perceptions empirically based?Research in Higher Education 15: 141–159.Google Scholar
  17. Smart, J. C., and Elton, C. F. (1975). Goal orientations of academic departments: a test of Biglan's model.Journal of Applied Psychology 60: 580–588.Google Scholar
  18. Smart, J. C., and Elton, C. F. (1976). Administrative roles of department chairmen. In J. C. Smart and J. R. Montgomery (eds.),Managing Academic Departments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Smart, J. C., and Elton, C. F. (1982). Validation of the Biglan model.Research in Higher Education 17(3): 213–229.Google Scholar
  20. Smart, J. C., and McLaughlin, G. W. (1978). Reward structures of academic disciplines.Research in Higher Education 8(1): 39–55.Google Scholar
  21. Whisler, T. L. (1970a).Information Technology and Organizational Change. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  22. Whisler, T. L. (1970b).The Impact of Computers on Organizations. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary D. Malaney
    • 1
  1. 1.The Ohio State University, Graduate SchoolUniversity HallColumbus

Personalised recommendations