Skip to main content
Log in

Majority and minority faculty perceptions in academe

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines majority (white) and minority faculty perceptions in academe. It focuses on two general areas of institutional activity: employment and workplace issues, and minority affairs. The data examined in this paper are from a study of faculty at the University of Colorado (CU) system. The faculty sample in this study consisted of 73 minority faculty and 122 majority faculty. The findings reported in this paper show that minority faculty are dissatisfied with certain contexts within the post-secondary education institution, and minority faculty feel excluded from others. Discussion in this paper examines the interaction of status (majority vs. minority) and gender with perceptions of the postsecondary education institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre, A., Jr. (1981). Chicano faculty in postsecondary educational institutions: Some thoughts on faculty development.California Journal of Teacher Education 8: 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agurre, A., Jr. (1987). An interpretative analysis of Chicano faculty in academe.Social Science Journal 24: 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R. (1979). Institutional discrimination in organizations and their environments. In R. Alvarez, K. Lutterman, and Associates (eds.),Discrimination in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 2–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arce, C. (1978). Chicano participation in academe: A case of academic colonialism.Grito del Sol: A Chicano Quarterly 3: 75–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, H., and Burciaga, C. (1981).Chicanos in Higher Education: Progress and Attainment. Los Angeles: University of California-Los Angeles Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avalos, M. (1991). The status of Latinos in the profession: Problems in recruitment and retention.PS: Political Science and Politics 24: 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1986). Strangers in academic paradise: Law teachers of color in still white schools.University of San Francisco Law Review 20: 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, L., and Thompson, T. (1989). The next generation of faculty: Minority issues.Education and Urban Society 21: 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (1987). Anti-minority mindset in the law school personnel process: Toward an understanding of racial mindsets.Law and Inequality 5: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunzel, J. (1990). Minority faculty hiring: Problems and prospects.American Scholar 59: 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D., Pearson, C., and Shavlik, D. (1988). Double jeopardy: Women of color in higher education.Educational Record 68(4)/69(1): 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M., Macagno-Shang, L., Staley, K., Stamler, V., and Johnson, M. (1989). Perceptions of the work environment and implications for women's career choice: A survey of university faculty women.Career Development Quarterly 38:57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chused, R. (1988). The hiring and retention of minorities and women on American law school faculties.University of Pennsylvania Law Review 137: 537–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • CU Faculty Senate Minority Affairs Committee (1990).Survey of CU Faculty: A Focus on Minority Affairs. Boulder, CO: Office on the Associate Vice-President for Personnel and Human Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R. (1988).Minority Law Professor's Lives: The Bell-Delgado Survey. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School Institute for Legal Studies Working Paper Series 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R. (1991a). Campus antiracism rules: Constitutional narratives in collision.Northwestern University Law Review 85: 343–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R. (1991b). Affirmative action as a majoritarian device: Or, do you really want to be a role model?Michigan Law Review 89: 1222–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, D., Png, I., and Rameyer, J. (1989). Gender, ethnicity and grades: Empirical evidence of discrimination in law-firm interviews.Law and Inequality 7: 189–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, C., and Blackburn, R. (1983). Black and white faculty in white research universities.Journal of Higher Education 54: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, L. (1988). Anticipating the demographic future.Change 20: 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. (1989). Institutional characteristics and faculty/administrator perceptions of outcomes: An exploratory analysis.Research in Higher Education 30: 113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exum, W. (1983). Climbing the crystal stair: Values, affirmative action, and minority faculty.Social Problems 30: 383–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, J. (1988). Racism and sexism in corporate America: Still not color-or gender-blind in the 1980s. In D. Thompson and N. DiTomaso (eds.),Ensuring Minority Success in Corporate Management. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 71–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza, H. (1988). The “barriozation” of Hispanic faculty.Educational Record 68(4)/69(1): 122–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza, H. (1991). Dilemmas of Chicano and Latino professors in U.S. universities. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Chicano and Latin American Studies, California State University-Fresno.

  • Golladay, M. (1989). Women and minority faculty in engineering: Reviewing the figures.Engineering Education 79: 573–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, L. (1989). Sex discrimination in promotion and tenure in journalism education.Journalism Quarterly 66: 93–100, 229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein, T., and Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis.American Sociological Review 43: 447–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1983). Minorities, women, and institutional change: Some administration concerns.Sociological Perspectives 26: 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, J. (1988). Race, class, power, and equal opportunity. In N. Bowie (ed.),Equal Opportunity. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 75–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu-Dehart, E. (1983). Women, minorities, and academic freedom. In C. Kaplan and E. Schrecker (eds.),Regulating the Intellectuals: Perspectives on Academic Freedom in the 1980s New York: Praeger, pp. 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, J., and Hall, R. (1984). Desegregation in higher education: An examination of traditionally black and white institutions.Sociological Inquiry 54: 382–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L., and Wunsch, M. (1991). Junior and senior faculty women: Commonalities and differences in perceptions of academic life.Psychological Reports 69: 879–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1988). Ensuring minority achievement in corporations: The importance of structural theory and structural change. In D. Thompson and N. DiTomaso (eds.),Ensuring Minority Success in Corporate Management. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 331–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kujovich, G. (1987). Equal opportunity in higher education ad the black public college: The era of separate but equal.Minnesota Law Review 72: 29–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D. (1984). Race inequality and the academic hierarchy.Integrateducation 22: 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, C. (1987). Equality and feminist legal theory.University of Pittsburgh Law Review 48: 1043–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, T. (1991).Some African American and Hispanic Voices from the University of Toledo. ERIC Document ED 328 153.

  • Lynch, F., and Beer, W. (1990). You ain't the right color pal: White resentment of affirmative action.Policy Review 51: 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magallan, R. (1983). Insights into the needs of a new source of students.Case Currents 9: 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, H. (1989). The dynamics and impact of majority processes on higher education, the curriculum, and black women.Sex Roles 21: 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges, R., and Exum, W. (1983). Barriers to the progress of women and minority faculty.Journal of Higher Education 54: 123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, H., Denhardt, K., Ruker, R., and Thomas, T. (1983). Implementing affirmative action and organizational compliance: The case of universities.Administration and Society 15: 363–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieves-Squires, S. (1992). Hispanic women in the U.S. academic context. In L. Welch (ed.),Perspectives on Minority Women in Higher Education. New York: Praeger, pp. 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieves-Squires, S. (1991).Hispanic Women: Making Their Presence on Campus Less Tenuous. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges Project on the Status and Education of Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J., and Axelrod, M. (1981). Women and minorities in the PSA region: Results of the 1979 survey.Pacific Sociological Review 24: 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivas, M. (1988). Latino faculty at the border: Increasing numbers key to more Hispanic access.Change 20: 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M., and White, T. (1992). Faculty and administrator perceptions of their environment: Different views or different models of organization?Research in Higher Education 33: 177–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W., and Blumberg, R. (1983). Tokenism and organizational change.Intergrateducation 20: 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, M. de la luz, and Halcon, J. (1991). Practices of the academy: Barriers to access for Chicano academics. In P. Altbach and K. Lomotey (eds.),The Racial Crisis in American Higher Education. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochin, R., and de la Torre, A. (1986). Chicano studies and affirmative action in higher education: Complementarities and prevailing issues. Unpublished manuscript, Chicano Studies Program, University of California-Davis.

  • Rooke, P. (1989). Re-ordering our partiality: Reflections on careerism and feminist commitment in academia.Journal of Educational Thought 23: 106–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, B. (1978). Retrenchment in education: The outlook for women and minorities. In S. Abramowitz and S. Rosenfeld (eds.),Declining Enrollment: The Challenge of the Coming Decade. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 371–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, G., and Rosenblum, B. (1990). Segmented labor markets in institutions of higher learning.Sociology of Education 63: 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. (1990). Eight myths about minorities in higher education.College Board Review 155: 12–19, 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., and Hixson, V. (1987). The work of university professor: Evidence of segmented labor markets inside the academy.Current Research on Occupations and Professions 4: 159–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E., and Witt, S. (1990). Black faculty and affirmative action at predominantly white institutions.Western Journal of Black Studies 14: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solmon, L., and Wingard, T. (1991). The changing demographics: Problems and opportunities. In P. Altbach and K. Lomotey (eds.),The Racial Crisis in American Higher Education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, M. (1990). Black faculty in white academia: The fit is an uneasy one.Western Journal of Black Studies 14: 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. (1990). From affirmative action to affirming diversity.Harvard Business Review 68: 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veilleux, F., and Tougas, F. (1989). Male acceptance of majority programs for women: The results of altruistic or egotistical motives?International Journal of Psychology 24: 485–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willie, C. (1988). Initiation of desegregation litigation: A majority or minority responsibility. In J. Williams (ed.),Desegregating America's Colleges and Universities. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, S. (1990).The Pursuit of Race and Gender Equity in American Academe. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, R., and Carmines, E. (1980).Measurement in the Social Sciences: The Link Between Theory and Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aguirre, A., Martinez, R. & Hernandez, A. Majority and minority faculty perceptions in academe. Res High Educ 34, 371–385 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991850

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991850

Keywords

Navigation