Abstract
The correlates of average departmental annual research journal publication rates of faculty were examined in three disciplines: chemistry, history, and psychology. Variables studied included factual information about each department, faculty perceptions and ratings, and graduate students' perceptions and ratings. Content included academic programs, specific policies and practices, characteristics of students, faculty, facilities, etc., as well as the quality of teaching and human relations in the departments. Although the common results indicated the importance of able faculty and students, a strong emphasis on research and the provision of time and funds for faculty to pursue research, there were discipline-specific patterns of results. In chemistry the pattern of productive departments suggested large research laboratories, in history a scholarly apprenticeship approach, and in psychology an emphasis on research over practice. Discipline specific studies may be the best approach to understanding research productivity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., and Hall, E. E. (1978). Research note: correlates of faculty publication.Sociology of Education 51: 132–141.
Chubin, D. E., Porter, A. L., and Bockman, M. (1981). Career patterns of scientists.American Sociological Review 46: 488–496.
Clark, M. J., and Centra, J. A. (1985). Influences on the career accomplishments of Ph.D.'s.Research in Higher Education 23: 256–269.
Clark, M. J., Hartnett, R. T., and Baird, L. L. (1976). Assessing dimensions of quality in doctoral education. Technical Report. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.
Fox, M. F. (1985). Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. I, pp. 255–282. New York: Agathon Press.
Jones, L. V., Lindsey, G., and Coggeshell, P. E. (1982).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (five volumes). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career.American Sociological Review 43: 899–908.
Roose, K. D. and Andersen, G. J. (1970).A Rating of Graduate Programs. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
Ward, P. (1981). History. In A. W. Chickering (ed.),The Modern American College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baird, L.L. What characterizes a productive research department?. Res High Educ 25, 211–225 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991787
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991787