Research in Higher Education

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 211–225

What characterizes a productive research department?

  • Leonard L. Baird
Article

Abstract

The correlates of average departmental annual research journal publication rates of faculty were examined in three disciplines: chemistry, history, and psychology. Variables studied included factual information about each department, faculty perceptions and ratings, and graduate students' perceptions and ratings. Content included academic programs, specific policies and practices, characteristics of students, faculty, facilities, etc., as well as the quality of teaching and human relations in the departments. Although the common results indicated the importance of able faculty and students, a strong emphasis on research and the provision of time and funds for faculty to pursue research, there were discipline-specific patterns of results. In chemistry the pattern of productive departments suggested large research laboratories, in history a scholarly apprenticeship approach, and in psychology an emphasis on research over practice. Discipline specific studies may be the best approach to understanding research productivity.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., and Hall, E. E. (1978). Research note: correlates of faculty publication.Sociology of Education 51: 132–141.Google Scholar
  2. Chubin, D. E., Porter, A. L., and Bockman, M. (1981). Career patterns of scientists.American Sociological Review 46: 488–496.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, M. J., and Centra, J. A. (1985). Influences on the career accomplishments of Ph.D.'s.Research in Higher Education 23: 256–269.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, M. J., Hartnett, R. T., and Baird, L. L. (1976). Assessing dimensions of quality in doctoral education. Technical Report. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  5. Fox, M. F. (1985). Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship. In J. C. Smart (ed.),Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. I, pp. 255–282. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jones, L. V., Lindsey, G., and Coggeshell, P. E. (1982).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (five volumes). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career.American Sociological Review 43: 899–908.Google Scholar
  8. Roose, K. D. and Andersen, G. J. (1970).A Rating of Graduate Programs. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  9. Ward, P. (1981). History. In A. W. Chickering (ed.),The Modern American College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard L. Baird
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Higher EducationUniversity of KentuckyLexington

Personalised recommendations