Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 335–346 | Cite as

A description of effective college teaching in five disciplines as measured by student ratings

  • John T. Pohlmann
Article

Abstract

Student rating of teachers in five disciplines (science and math, education, social sciences, humanities, and business) were analyzed to determine which teacher attributes were important in predicting ratings of teaching effectiveness. Rating results from 1,439 courses taught at Southern Illinois University, Carbondale from 1973 to 1974 were used as data for this study. The results indicated that the instructor attributes rated as characteristic of effective instruction were highly consistent across disciplines, and the effective instructor was described as (1) knowing when students understood him, (2) increasing students' appreciation of the subject matter, (3) answering impromptu questions satisfactorily, (4) achieving the objectives of the course, and (5) giving several examples to explain complex topics.

Key words

student ratings teaching effectiveness instructor evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astin, A. (1971). “Predicting Academic Performance in College.” New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Costin, F. (1968). Survey of opinions about lecturers. University of Illinois, Department of Psychology. (Mimeograph.)Google Scholar
  3. Costin, F., Greenough, W. T., and Menges, R. J. (1972). Student ratings of college teaching: reliability, validity and usefulness. Review of Educational Research 41:511–535.Google Scholar
  4. Crawford, P. L., and Bradshaw, H. L. (1968). Perception of characteristics of effective university teachers: A scaling analyses. Educational Psychological Measurement 28:1079–1085.Google Scholar
  5. Desphande, A. S., Webb, S. C., and Marks, E. (1970). Student perceptions of engineering instructor behaviors and their relationships to the evaluation of instructors and courses. American Educational Research Journal 7:289–305.Google Scholar
  6. Downie, N. W. (1952). Student evaluation of faculty. Journal of Higher Education 23:495–496, 503.Google Scholar
  7. Gadzella, B. M. (1968). College student views and ratings of an ideal professor. College and University 44:89–96.Google Scholar
  8. Isaacson, R. L., McKeachie, W. J., and Milholland, J. E. (1963). Correlation of teacher personality variables and student ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology 54:110–117.Google Scholar
  9. McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y., and Mann, W. (1971). Student ratings of teacher effectiveness: validity studies. American Educational Research Journal 8:435–445.Google Scholar
  10. Pohlmann, J. T. (1973). Evaluating instructional effectiveness with the instructional improvement questionnaire. Southern Illinois University, Testing Center. (Unpublished technical report.)Google Scholar
  11. Turner, R. L. (1970). Good teaching and its contexts. Phi Delta Kappan 51:155–158.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© APS Publications, Inc. 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • John T. Pohlmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Guidance and Educational PsychologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondale

Personalised recommendations