Research in Higher Education

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Assessment of job satisfaction among college administrators

  • John C. Smart
  • Barry R. Morstain
Article

Abstract

This study represented an initial effort to explore the potential of the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) as an instrument for the measurement of job satisfaction in institutions of higher learning. The JDI is a standardized measure of five dimensions of job satisfaction that has been used almost exclusively in non-educational organizations. A selected sample of college administrators was categorized into three groups based upon the degree of congruency between their preferred and perceived job responsibilities. The results of the study showed that those college administrators whose preferred and perceived job responsibilities were most congruent tended to earn a higher mean score on the Work Environment scale of the JDI than their colleagues whose preferred and perceived job responsibilities were less congruent. The implications of this finding were discussed in terms of future research on job satisfaction in the academic community and between administrators in different types of organizational settings.

Keywords

Work Environment Standardize Measure Education Research Academic Community Initial Effort 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Besse, R. M. (1973). A comparison of the university with the corporation. In James A. Perkins (Ed.), “The University as an Organization.” New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Bock, R. D. and Haggard, E. A. (1968). The use of multivariate analysis of variance in behavioral research. In D. K. Whitla (Ed.) “Handbook of Measurement and Assessment in Behavioral Sciences.” Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Bowen, H. R. and Douglas, G. K. (1971). “Efficiency in Liberal Education.” New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Caplow, T. and McGee, R. J. (1965). “The Academic Marketplace.” Garden City, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. Eckert, R. E. and Stecklein, J. E. (1961). “Job Motivations and Satisfactions of College Teachers.” Washington: U.S. Office of Education.Google Scholar
  6. Glenny, L. A. (1971). The anonymous leaders of higher institutions. Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  7. Hartnett, R. T. (1971). “Accountability in Higher Education.” Princeton: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
  8. Hoppock, R. (1935). “Job Satisfaction.” New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  9. Malinovsky, M. R. and Barry, J. R. (1965). Determinants of work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49:446–451.Google Scholar
  10. Parsons, T. and Platt, G. M. (1968). “The American Academic Professions: A Pilot Study.” Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  11. Peterson, R. E. (1970). “The Crisis of Purpose: Definition and Uses of Institutional Goals.” Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  12. Rao, C. R. (1952). “Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research.” New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Rourke, F. E. and Brooks, G. W. (1966). “The Managerial Revolution in Higher Edu-Education.” Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  14. Saleh, S. D. (1964). A study of attitude change in the pre-retirement period. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48:310–312.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., and Hulin, C. L. (1969). “The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement.” Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  16. Tincher, W. A. (1970). “A Study of the Members of the Association for Institutional Research.” Auburn, Alabama: The Association for Institutional Research.Google Scholar
  17. Vroom, R. H. (1964). “Work and Motivation.” New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© APS Publications, Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Smart
    • 1
  • Barry R. Morstain
    • 2
  1. 1.Office of Institutional ResearchVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg
  2. 2.Office of Academic Planning and EvaluationUniversity of DelawareNewark

Personalised recommendations