Learned helplessness deficits: Uncontrollable outcomes or perceived failure?
- 120 Downloads
An experiment is described showing that learned helplessness deficits are produced by prior exposure to uncontrollable outcomes rather than perceived failure. Although the controllability manipulation did produce differences in perceived success or failure, similar differences were also induced by means of instructional feedback. These latter differences, within the controllable and uncontrollable groups, were not associated with poorer performance by subjects given failure feedback. Moreover, the instructional feedback did not influence subjects' perceptions of controllability or uncontrollability. The results confirm that helplessness deficits cannot be explained as reactions to task failure.
KeywordsSocial Psychology Poor Performance Similar Difference Prior Exposure Task Failure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87 49–74.Google Scholar
- Coyne, J. C., Metalsky, G. T., & Lavelle, T. L. (1980). Learned helplessness as experiment-induced failure and its alleviation with attentional redeployment.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89 350–357.Google Scholar
- Dyck, D. G., Vallentyne, S., & Breen, L. J. (1979). Duration of failure, causal attributions for failure, and subsequent reactions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15 122–132.Google Scholar
- Frankel, A., Snyder, M. L. (1978). Poor performance following unsolvable problems: Learned helplessness or egotism?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 1415–1423.Google Scholar
- Griffith, M. (1977). Effects of noncontingent success and failure on mood and performance.Journal of Personality, 45 442–457.Google Scholar
- Hiroto, D. S., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31 311–327.Google Scholar
- Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effects of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 241–251.Google Scholar
- Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal-setting and task performance: 1969–1980.Psychological Bulletin, 90 125–152.Google Scholar
- Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 84 231–259.Google Scholar
- Oakes, W. F., & Curtis, N. (1982). Learned helplessness: Not dependent upon cognitions, attributions, or other such phenomenal experiences.Journal of Personality, 50 387–408.Google Scholar
- Roth, S. (1980). A revised model of learned helplessness in humans.Journal of Personality, 48 103–133.Google Scholar
- Roth, S., & Kubal, L. (1975). Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on tasks of differing importance: Facilitation and learned helplessness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 680–691.Google Scholar
- Seligman, M. E. P. (1975).Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Thornton, J. W., & Jacobs, P. D. (1972). The facilitating effects of prior inescapable/unavoidable stress on intellectual performance.Psychonomic Science, 26 185–187.Google Scholar
- Tiggemann, M. (1981). Noncontingent successversus noncontingent failure and learned helplessness.Journal of Psychology, 109 233–238.Google Scholar
- Tiggemann, M., Barnett, A., & Winefield, A. H. (1983). Uncontrollability versus perceived failure as a determinant of subsequent performance deficits.Motivation and Emotion, 7 257–268.Google Scholar
- Wortman, C. B., & Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar