Research in Higher Education

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 1–22 | Cite as

Student evaluation using lists of descriptive statements

  • Barrett Hazeltine
Article

Abstract

The development of an evaluation system is discussed that uses a list of statements describing particular aspects of the student's work in a course. The instructor marks those statements which are applicable to the student's performance. The statement lists are read by an optical scanner and stored in a computer. When required, the computer produces a listing of the statements chosen. The system is intended to be more precise than letter grades, to be easier to handle (for both instructor and registrar) than evaluative paragraphs, and to guide the instructor in making an evaluation. The system has been implemented on an experimental basis for two years, and reactions have been obtained from students, faculty, and graduate and professional school admission officers.

Keywords

Evaluation System Education Research Experimental Basis Student Evaluation Statement List 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, D. R. (1962). Personality, college environment, and academic productivity. In “The American College” (N. Stanford, ed.). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Elbow, P. H. (1969). More accurate evaluation of student performance. The Journal of Higher Education 40:219–230.Google Scholar
  3. Hilton, T. L., Kendall, L. M., and Sprecher, T. B. (1970). “Performance Criteria in Graduate Business Study. Parts I and II: Development of Rating Scales, Background Data Form and the Pilot Study.” Research Bulletin RB-70-3. Princeton, New Jersey: Education Testing Service.Google Scholar
  4. Mulski, J. H., and Levy, M. (1972). When a computer fills out students' report cards. Industrial Education 61:57–59.Google Scholar
  5. Rogers, J. (1973). “Report on Students Committee on Undergraduate Education Conference: Are Universities Capable of Change.” Available from the Office of the Dean of The College, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  6. Rossman, J. E. (1970). Graduate school attitudes to S-U grades. Educational Record 51:310–313.Google Scholar
  7. Schoemer, J. R., Thomas, J. E., and Bragoner, W. H. (1973). A study of admission to graduate school and the awarding of financial assistance. College and University 48:147–153.Google Scholar
  8. Warren, J. (1971). “College Grading Practice: An Overview.” Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© APS Publications, Inc. 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barrett Hazeltine
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of EngineeringBrown UniversityProvidence

Personalised recommendations