Abstract
This article reports the results of an experimental study of the effects of students' evaluative feedback to university instructors. Data obtained indicated that feedback from students did not have any significant effects on the instructors' teaching performance and their perception of teaching. Some limitations of the study are discussed with suggestions for further exploration of the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M. J. and Tannenbaum, P. H.Theories of cognitive consistency: A source book. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.
Braunstein, D. N., Klein, G. A. and Pachla, M. Feedback expectancy and shifts in student ratings of college faculty.Journal of Applied Psychology 1973,58 (2), 254–255.
Bryan, R. C.Reactions to teachers by students, parents and administrators. Kalamazoo, Mich.: U.S. Office of Education, Cooperative Research Project 668, 1963.
Centra, J. A. Effectiveness of student feedback in modifying college instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology 1973,65 (3), 395–401.
Deese, J., and Hulse, S. H.The psychology of learning (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
Dressel, P. L.Handbook of academic evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976.
Ebel, K. E.The recognition and evaluation of teaching. Washington, D.C.: American Association of University Professors, 1971.
Gage, N. L., Runkel, P. J., and Chatterjee, B. B. Changing teacher behavior through feedback from pupils: An application of equilibrium theory. In Charters, W. W., and Gage, N. L. (Eds.),Reading in the social psychology of education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1963, pp. 173–181.
Gage, N. L. Students' ratings of college teaching: Their justification and proper use. Glasman, N. S. and Killait, B. R. (Eds.),Second U.C.S.B. Conference on Effective Teaching. Santa Barbara: The University of California, 1974, pp. 70–86.
Glasman, N. S., Killait, B. R., and Gmelch, W.Evaluation of instructors in higher education: Concepts, research and development. Santa Barbara: Regents of the University of California, 1974.
Hays, W. L.Statistics for the social science (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
Isaacson, R. L., McKeachie, W. J., Milholland, J. E., Lin, Y. G., Hofeller, M., Baerwaldt, J. W., and Zinn, K. L. Dimensions of student evaluations of teaching.Journal of Educational Psychology 1964,55 344–351.
McKeachie, W. J. Student ratings of faculty,A.A.U.P. Bulletin 1969,55 439–444.
Miller, M. T. Instructor attitudes toward, and their use of, student ratings of teachers.Journal of Educational Psychology 1971,62 (3), 235–239.
Pambookian, H. S. Initial level of student evaluation of instruction as a source of influence on instructor change after feedback.Journal of Educational Psychology 1974,66 (1), 52–56.
Popham, W. J., and Sirotnik, K. A.Educational statistics, use and interpretation (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1973.
Rotem, A.The effects of feedback from students to university professors: An experimental study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Santa Barbara, 1975.
Rotem, A., and Glasman, N. S. Evaluation of university instructors in the United States: The context.Higher Education 1977,6 75–92.
Smock, R., and Crooks, T.A plan for the comprehensive evaluation of college teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, February, 1973.
Thomas, H. Changing teacher behavior. An experiment in feedback from students and teachers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University, 1969.
Tannenbaum, P. H. Summary: Is anything special about consistency? In Abelson, R. P., et al,Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A source book. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968, 343–346.
Tuckman, B. W. and Oliver, W. F. Effectiveness of feedback to teachers as a function of the source.Journal of Educational Psychology 196859 (4), 297–301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rotem, A. The effects of feedback from students to university instructors: An experimental study. Res High Educ 9, 303–318 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991403
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991403