Abstract
Three substudies of effects of different formats on student ratings of faculty teaching effectiveness were conducted. One substudy, Kinds of Keys, investigated three main kinds of keys: Agreement, Evaluation, and Needs Improvement. The second, NO TUP, investigated numbers of positive rating categories. The third, Item Wording Direction, investigated the same items worded positively, negatively, and neutrally, respectively. Practically important differences in level of ratings obtained in Kinds of Keys and practically and statistically significant differences obtained in NO TUP and Item Wording Direction. It was concluded that additional research is necessary to determine if apparent differences in teaching effectiveness are actually differences in teaching effectiveness or differences due to the methods of measurement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Follman, J. (1971). Essay grading formats. Unpublished study, University of South Florida.
Follman, J., and Reilly, R. (in press). Generosity in essay grading. Florida Journal of Educational Research.
Follman, J., Silverman, S., and Reilly, R. (1973). Generosity in grading formats revisited. Florida Educational Research Association, Tampa.
Follman, J. (1972). Student ratings and student achievement. Unpublished article, University of South Florida.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). “Psychometric Methods.” New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Follman, J., Lucoff, M., Small, L. et al. Kinds of Keys of student ratings of faculty teaching effectiveness. Res High Educ 2, 173–179 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991297
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991297