Skip to main content
Log in

Presentational and affect-management functions of nonverbal involvement

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to offer an elaboration of an earlier classification of functions of nonverbal involvement (Patterson, 1982, 1983). Specifically, two additional functions of nonverbal involvement, the presentational function and the affect-management function are proposed and discussed. The presentational function is manifested in the purposeful involvement patterns with partners that are designed to create an identity or image, either at the individual or dyadic level. The affect-management function is manifested when intense affect produces adjustments in nonverbal involvement that either serves to control the negative affect (fear, shame) or maximizes the positive affect (happiness, joy). The two functions are discussed in terms of the circumstances that contribute to their emergence in social settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept.American Psychologist, 36 715–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P. A. & Andersen, J. F. (1984). The exchange of nonverbal intimacy: A critical review of dyadic models.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8 327–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1972). Non-verbal communication in human social interaction. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.),Non-verbal communication (pp. 243–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation.Sociometry, 28 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. & Kendon, A. (1967). The experimental analysis of social performance. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 55–98). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M., Lalljee, M., & Cook, M. (1968). The effects of visability on interaction in a dyad.Human Relations, 21 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. L. & Allen, V. L. (1983). Perceived structure of nonverbal behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 458–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970).Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, R. (1984).The communication of emotions. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test.Human Communication Research, 4 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1980). Nonverbal communication research in the 1970's.Communication Yearbook, 4 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1985). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.),Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 344–390). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. & Jones, S. B. (1976). Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations.Human Communication Research, 2 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. & Saine, T. (1978).The unspoken dialogue: An introduction to nonverbal communication. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H. (1980).Self-consciousness and social anxiety. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappella, J. N. & Greene, J. O. (1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant-adult interaction.Communication Monographs, 49 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelmann, R. J. & Hampson, S. E. (1979). Changes in nonverbal behavior during embarrassment.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18 385–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelmann, R. J. & Hampson, S. E. (1981). Embarrassment in dyadic interaction.Social Behavior and Personality, 9 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage and codings.Semiotica, 1 49–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. (1984).Unmasking the face (revised edition). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. A. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations, 7 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A., Stitt, J. L., & Finch, M. (1984). Couple tie-signs and interpersonal threat: A field experiment.Social Psychology Quarterly, 47 282–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959).Presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963).Behavior in public places. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967).Interaction ritual. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1972).Relations in public. New York: Harper Colophon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. P. (1973). Nonverbal communication. In I. S. Pool, W. Schramm, N. Maccoby, F. Fry, E. Parker, & J. L. Fern (Eds.),Handbook of communication (pp. 93–115). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckel, R. V., Allen, S. S., & Blackmon, D. C. (1986). Tactile communication of winners in flag football.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63 553–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction.Acta Psychologica, 26 22–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R. & Atherton, S. C. (1986). Self-efficacy, social anxiety, and inhibition in interpersonal encounters.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4 256–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H. (1974). Emotions: A basic problem for social psychology. In C. Nemeth (Ed.),Social psychology: Classic and contemporary integrations (pp. 1–51). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D. M. (1972). Formal analysis of communicative processes. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.),Non-verbal communication (pp. 3–25) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception in ongoing behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newtson, D. & Enquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12 436–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newtson, D., Enquist, G., & Bois, J. (1977). The objective basis of behavior units.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 847–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1976). An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy.Psychological Review, 83 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1982). A sequential functional model of nonverbal exchange.Psychological Review, 89 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1983).Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S. (1959).The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schflen, A. E. (1974).How behavior means. Garden City, NJ: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheflen, A. E. & Ashcraft, N. (1976). Human territories: How we behave in space-time. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrightsman, L. S. (1960). Effects of waiting with others on changes in level of felt anxiety.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61 216–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation.Science, 149 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A version of this paper was presented at the Third International Conference on Social Psychology and Language, Bristol, England, July, 1987. The completion of this paper was facilitated by support from National Institute of Mental Health grant R01 MH41793-01. I want to thank Eric Knowles for serving as action editor on this manuscript. I also want to thank Judee Burgoon and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments and insights on the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patterson, M.L. Presentational and affect-management functions of nonverbal involvement. J Nonverbal Behav 11, 110–122 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990961

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990961

Keywords

Navigation