Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

To verify and supplement a series of quantitative studies of attitudes about the New Age in which 143 panelists were surveyed, I analyzed qualitatively 86 comments. In general, findings were consistent with those yielded by statistical analyses. An expert panel was more tolerant of terms, practices, and beliefs than a panel of critics. Many respondents characterized the New Age as complex, diverse, and eclectic. When I examined those comments that were concerned with the survey itself, I classified them as predominantly unfavorable, with most charging ambiguity of items and bias on the part of the investigators. When I inspected the comments for frequent topics, those with off-beat religious preferences were more favorable to the New Age than those with traditional preferences. Positive suggestions, expressions of tolerance, and other remarks were noted. I concluded that skeptics and anti-cult specialists may have to change their conceptions of the New Age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dole, A.A., Langone, M.D., Dubrow-Eichel, S., “New Age Movement: Fad or Menace?”Cultic Studies J., 1990,7, 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —, “Is the New Age Harmless: Critics vs. Experts?”Cultic Studies J., in press.

  3. Ibid.

  4. Doleet al., “New Age Movement: Fad or Menace?”op.cit..

    Google Scholar 

  5. MacLaine, S.,Out on a Limb. New York, Bantam Books, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson, M.,The Aquarian Conspiracy. Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. LeBar, J., Burtner, K., Debold, W., McGuire, J.,Cults, Sects, and the New Age. Huntington, Indiana, Our Sunday Visitor Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, J.R., Melton, J.G., eds.,Perspectives on the New Age. Albany, New York, State University of New York Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kurtz, P., “The New Age in Perspective,”Skeptical Inquirer, 1989,13, 4, 365–368.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Langone, M.D., “Beware of ‘New Age’ Solutions to Age-old Problems,”Business and Society Review, 69, 39–42.

  11. Raschke, C., “The New Age Rage and Corporate America”Spiritual Counterfeits J., 1989,9, 1, 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosedale, H., “New Age, Business, and the Law,”Spiritual Counterfeits J., 1989,9, 1, 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon, H.,Channeling into the New Age. Buffalo, N.Y., Prometheus, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoyt, K., The Spiritual Counterfeits Project,The New Age Rage. San Francisco, Calif., F.H. Revell, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dubrow-Eichel, S., Dubrow-Eichel, L., “Trouble in Paradise: Some Observations on Psychotherapy with New Agers,”Cultic Studies J., 1988,5, 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garvey, K., “The Importance of Information Collection in Exit Counseling: A Case Study,” chapter in Langone, M.D., ed.,Recovery from Cults: Help for Victims of Psychological and Spiritual Abuse, 1993.

  17. Doleet al., “Is the New Age Movement Harmless: Critics vs. Experts? ”op.cit.

  18. Ibid.. See this article for a more complete description of the quantitative study, including panel selection, questionnaire development, data collection, data analyses, and discussion. Terms, practices, beliefs, and characteristics were rated on five-step scales ranging from very harmful to very beneficial, etc.

  19. Ibid.

  20. Ibid.

  21. Allport, G.W.,The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Science. New York, Social Science Research Council, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, R.K.,Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, Calif., Sage, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Isaac, S., Michael, W.B.,Handbook in Research and Evaluation. 2nd ed. San Diego, Calif., EdITS, 1981, pp. 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Doleet al., “Is the New Age Movement Harmless: Critics vs. Experts? ”op.cit.

  25. Ibid.

  26. Langone, “Beware of ‘New Age’ Solutions to Age-old Problems,”op.cit.

  27. Dubrow-Eichel,et al., “Trouble in Paradise: Some Observations on Psychotherapy with New Agers,”op.cit..

    Google Scholar 

  28. Doleet al., “New Age Movement: Fad or Menace?”op.cit.. Participation rates were 47% of AFF board members, 29% of CSICOP fellows, and approximately 20% of experts solicited. See article for more details on panel selection.

  29. Todeschi, K.,Personal Letter, Virginia Beach, Virginia, September 24, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  31. Doleet al., “Is the New Age Movement Harmless: Critics vs. Experts?”op.cit.

  32. Dole, A.A., Dubrow-Eichel, S., “Some New Religions are Dangerous,”Cultic Studies J., 1985,2, 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lewis,et al., Perspectives on the New Age.op.cit. See especially pp. 128–135, 221.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An active member of the American Family Foundation, he is on the Board of Directors, the Research Advisory Committee, and the New Age Study Group. He is also on the Editorial Advisory Boards of theCultic Studies Journal andthe Journal of Religion and Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dole, A.A. Some conceptions of the new age. J Relig Health 32, 261–276 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990953

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990953

Keywords

Navigation