Abstract
This study explores the dimensionality of partisan strength and independence by analyzing the relationships between the traditional four-point partisan strength scale, a strength of independence scale, and other relevant variables in the 1980 and 1984 NES/CPS election studies. In particular, the investigation centers on the possible different explanations for independence. The findings tend to support explanations for independence that concern party attachment and civic responsibility. The data show that partisan strength and independence are separate components of party identification. Previous findings based on the use of the traditional partisan strength scale may therefore need to be reconsidered.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Abramson, Paul R. (1976). Generational change and the decline of party identification in America: 1952–1974.American Political Science Review 70: 469–478.
Abramson, Paul R. (1979). Developing party identification: a further examination of life-cycle, generational, and period effects.American Journal of Political Science 23: 78–96.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Cohen, Jacob, and Cohen, Patricia (1975).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Converse, Philip (1976).The Dynamics of Party Support. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
Dennis, Jack (1988a). Political independence in America, Part 1: on being an independent partisan supporter.British Journal of Political Science 18: 77–109.
Dennis, Jack (1988b). Political independence in America, Part 2: towards a theory.British Journal of Political Science 18: 197–219.
Kamieniecki, Sheldon (1985).Party Identification, Political Behavior, and the American Electorate. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Katz, Richard S. (1979). The dimensionality of party identification: cross-national perspectives.Comparative Politics 11: 147–163.
Keith, Bruce, Magleby, David, Nelson, Candice, Orr, Elizabeth, Westlye, Mark, and Wolfinger, Raymond (1986). The partisan affinities of independent “leaners.”British Journal of Political Science 16: 155–185.
King, James D. (1981). Comparing local and presidential elections.American Politics Quarterly 9: 277–290.
Milbrath, Lester, and Goel, M. Lal (1977).Political Participation: How and Why Do People Get Involved in Politics? Chicago: Rand McNally.
Miller, Arthur H., and Wattenberg, Martin P. (1983). Measuring party identification: Independent or no partisan preference?American Journal of Political Science 27: 106–121.
Petrocik, John R. (1974). An analysis of intransitivities in the index of party identification.Political Methodology 1: 31–47.
Pomper, Gerald (1975).Voter's Choice: Varieties of American Electoral Behavior. New York: Dodd, Mead.
Shively, W. Phillips (1979). The development of party identification among adults: exploration of a functional model.American Political Science Review 73: 1039–1054.
Sigel, Roberta S. (1964). Effect of partisanship on the perception of political candidates.Public Opinion Quarterly 28: 483–496.
Valentine, David C., and Van Wingen, John R. (1980). Partisanship, independence, and the partisan identification question.American Politics Quarterly 8: 165–186.
Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H. (1972).Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.
Wattenberg, Martin P. (1986).The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1984. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Weisberg, Herbert F. (1980). A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification.Political Behavior 2: 33–60.
Weisberg, Herbert F. (1983). A new scale of partisanship.Political Behavior 5: 363–376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamieniecki, S. The dimensionality of partisan strength and political independence. Polit Behav 10, 364–376 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990809
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990809
Keywords
- Relevant Variable
- Separate Component
- Election Study
- Party Identification
- Political Psychology