Skip to main content
Log in

States and PACs: The legacy of established decision rules

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth of political action committees (PACs) and their growing role in campaign finance have led to calls for placing limits on campaign contributions by PACs. State decisions regarding whether to limit PAC contributions appear to result from established policy orientations regarding other campaign finance issues: states with a history of previous efforts to regulate campaign finances are more likely to limit PAC contributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrian, Charles R. (1976).State and Local Governments, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adrian, Charles R., and Press, Charles (1977).Governing Urban America. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Herbert E. (1984).Financing Elections, 3rd ed. Washington: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyle, Thad L. (1983). The cost of becoming governor.State Government 56: 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Book of the States (1982–1983). Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.

  • Caldeira, Gregory A., and Patterson, Samuel C. (1982a). Bringing home the votes: electoral outcomes in state legislative races.Political Behavior 4: 33–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, Gregory A., and Patterson, Samuel C. (1982b). Contextual influences on participation in U.S. state legislative elections.Legislative Studies Quarterly 7: 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Commission on Campaign Financing (CCCF) (1985).The New Gold Rush: Financing California's Legislative Campaigns. Los Angeles: Center for Responsive Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, Aage R. (1973).How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowart, Andrew (1969). Anti-poverty expenditures in the American states: a comparative analysis.Midwest Journal of Political Science 13: 219–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, Elizabeth (1983).Politics and Money. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Thomas R. (1966).Politics, Economics, and the Public. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, George, and Sharkansky, Ira (1978).The Policy Predicament. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazar, Daniel (1972).American Federalism: A View From the States, 2nd ed. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert S., Luttbeg, Norman R., and Tedin, Kent L. (1980).American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Content, and Impact, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert S., McIver, John P., and Wright, Gerald C., Jr. (1987). State political culture and public opinion.American Political Science Review 81: 797–813

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Election Commission (FEC) (1986).Annual Report 1985 (June).

  • Fling, Karen J. (1979). The states as laboratories of reform. In Herbert E. Alexander (ed.).,Political Finance, pp. 245–269. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, Micheal W., and Pritchard, Anita (1985). Campaign expenditures and legislative elections in Florida.Legislative Studies Quarterly 10: 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz, Stanton A., Abramowitz, Alan I., and Burkart, Michael P. (1976). Election outcomes: whose money matters?Journal of Politics 38: 1033–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, Charles D., and Nick, Rainer (1987). The two step flow of state campaign funds: PACs as donors and receivers in Louisiana.Western Political Quarterly 40: 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferbert, Richard, and Urice, John (1985). Small scale policy: the federal stimulus versus competing explanations for state funding for the arts.American Journal of Political Science 29: 308–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckshorn, Robert J. (1985). Who gave it? who got it?: the enforcement of campaign finance laws in the states.Journal of Politics 47: 773–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C. (1980).Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ruth S. (1984). Financing state elections. In Michael J. Malbin (ed.),Money and Politics in the United States, pp. 172–213. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ruth S., and Borris, Thomas J. (1985). Strategic contributing in legislative campaigns: the case of Minnesota.Legislative Studies Quarterly 10 (February): 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Woodrow, Jr., and Keiser, K. Robert (1987). Issue visibility and the effects of PAC money.Social Science Quarterly 68 (March): 170–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John (1981).Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, Laura I. (1986). Money and access: some empirical evidence.Journal of Politics 48 (November): 1052–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineberry, Robert L. (1978).American Public Policy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malbin, Michael J. (1980). Of mountains and molehills: PACs, campaigns, and public policy. In Michael J. Malbin (ed.),Parties, Interest Groups, and Campaign Finance Laws, pp. 152–184. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, Eugene (1978). Uncertainty and national nominating coalitions.Journal of Politics 40: 1011–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morehouse, Sarah (1981).State Politics, Parties, and Policy. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nice, David C. (1984a). Political equality and campaign finance in the American states.Social Science Quarterly 65: 1104–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nice, David C. (1984b). Interest groups and policymaking in the American states.Political Behavior 6: 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R. (1976).The Changing American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Samuel C. (1982). Campaign spending in contests for governor.Western Political Quarterly 35: 457–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1983). Getting out the vote: participation in gubernatorial elections.American Political Science Review 77: 675–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1984). The etiology of partisan competition.American Political Science Review 78: 691–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romig, Candace (1984). Placing limits on PACs.State Legislatures 10: 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, Larry J. (1985).PAC Power: Inside the World of Political Action Committees, rev. ed. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Robert (1978). Policy innovations as a trait of American states.Journal of Politics 40: 212–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellhardt, Timothy D. (1982). Corporate PACs turning attention to the states as deregulation gains.Wall Street Journal (October 28): 33.

  • Schroedel, Jean Reith (1986). Campaign contributions and legislative outcomes.Western Political Quarterly 39: 371–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, Harvey J., and Weber, Ronald E. (1987). State legislative election outcomes: contextual effects and legislative performance effects.Legislative Studies Quarterly 12: 537–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twentieth Century Fund, Task Force on Political Action Committees (1984).What Price PACs? New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (annual).Statistical Abstract of the United States.

  • Walker, Jack (1969). The diffusion of innovation among the American states.American Political Science Review 63: 880–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack (1971). Innovation in state politics. In Herbert Jacob and Kenneth N. Vines (eds.),Politics in the American States, 2nd ed., pp. 354–387. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Tom (1976). Business PACs wary of campaign finance bill.Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (April 25): 782–784.

  • Welch, W. P. (1976). The effectiveness of expenditures in state legislative races.American Politics Quarterly 4: 333–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron (1974).The Politics of the Budgetary Process, 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Gerald C., Jr., Erikson, Robert S., and McIver, John P. (1985). Measuring state partisanship and ideology with survey data.Journal of Politics 47: 469–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Gerald C., Jr., Erikson, Robert S., and McIver, John P. (1987). Public opinion and policy liberalism in the American states.American Journal of Political Science 31: 980–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, John R. (1985). PACs, contributions, and roll calls: an organizational perspective.American Political Science Review 79: 400–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler, L. Harmon (1983). Interest groups in the states. In Virginia Gray, Herbert Jacob, and Kenneth N. Vines (eds.),Politics in the American States, 4th ed., pp. 97–132. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleischmann, A., Nice, D.C. States and PACs: The legacy of established decision rules. Polit Behav 10, 349–363 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990808

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990808

Keywords

Navigation