Skip to main content

The sources of liberal-conservative thinking: Education and conceptualization

Abstract

In this study, I examine two sources of liberal-conservative thinking within the American electorate: Education and level of conceptualization. This analysis differs from previous work in at least two important ways. First, I test the impacts of education and conceptualization simultaneously. Second, I focus on the degree to which people actively use the liberal-conservative continuum to organize their perceptions of the parties and candidates. Empirical analysis of data from the 1984 CPS National Election Study confirms that education and conceptualization have roughly equivalent effects on ideological structuring in political perceptions. I discuss the implications of this finding for the study of mass belief systems and information processing within the American public.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bennett, W. Lance (1977). The growth of knowledge in mass belief system studies: an epistemological critique.American Journal of Political Science 21: 465–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960).The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J., and Feldman, Stanley (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications.American Journal of Political Science 25: 617–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In David E. Apter (ed.),Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1975). Public opinion and voting behavior. In Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.),The Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 4. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., and Williams, Carol J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: an investigation of the 1984 presidential election.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, John Osgood, and Anderson, Ronald E. (1969). Ideology in the public's conceptualization of the 1964 election.Public Opinion Quarterly 33: 380–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E. (1984).Social Cognition. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, John A. (1986). Trends in self-identified ideology from 1972 to 1982: no support for the salience hypothesis.American Journal of Political Science 30: 517–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagner, Paul R., and Pierce, John C. (1982). Correlative characteristics of the levels of conceptualization in the American Public: 1956–1976.Journal of Politics 44: 779–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagner, Paul R., Pierce, John C. and Knight, Kathleen (1985). Codebook for levels of conceptualization coding, 1956–1984. Ann Arbor, Mich.: ICPSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, Ruth, and Lodge, Milton (1986). Cognitive consequences of political sophistication. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears, (eds.),Political Cognition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, Ruth C., Lodge, Milton, and Blake, Frederick (1985). The breadth, depth, and utility of class, partisan, and ideological schemata.American Journal of Political Science 29: 850–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, Reid (1981). Schematic principles in human memory. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, and M. P. Zanna (eds.),Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Volume I). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, John D., and Robinson, John P. (1978). Ideological identification and the American voter.Public Opinion Quarterly 42: 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, Robert (1986). Political attitudes as social categories: a new look at selective memory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 233–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, William G. (1986). Levels of conceptualization and reliance on the liberal-conservative continuum.Journal of Politics 48: 423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., and Kulik, J. A. (1980). Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38: 569–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Kathleen (1985). Ideology in the 1980 election: ideological sophistication does matter.Journal of Politics 47: 828–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, James H., Metlay, Daniel S., and Kay, W. D. (1982). Citizen knowledge and choices on the complex issue of nuclear energy.American Journal of Political Science 26: 615–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard R. (1986). Political schemata, candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. In Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears, eds.Political Cognition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, Teresa E., and Miller, Warren E. (1979). Ideological interpretations of presidential elections.American Political Science Review 73: 751–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, Milton G., and Hamill, Ruth (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing.American Political Science Review 80: 505–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luskin, Robert C. (1987). Measuring ideological sophistication.American Journal of Political Science 31: 856–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttbeg, Norman R., and Gant, Michael M. (1985). The failure of liberal-conservative ideology as a cognitive structure.Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. Russell (1986).The Paradox of Mass Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John (1979).The Changing American Voter, enlarged ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David O., Lau, Richard R., Tyler, Tom R., and Allen, Harris M., Jr. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting.American Political Science Review 74: 670–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Eric R. A. N. (1980). Levels of conceptualization: false measures of ideological sophistication.”American Political Science Review 74: 685–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Eliot R., and Lerner, Miriam (1986). Development of automatism of social judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 246–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Kuklinski, James H. (1984). Policy reasoning and political values: the problem of racial equality.American Journal of Political Science 28: 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stimson, James A. (1975). Belief systems: constraint, complexity, and the 1972 election.American Journal of Political Science 19: 393–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., and Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, and M. P. Zanna (eds.),Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. I. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist 35: 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacoby, W.G. The sources of liberal-conservative thinking: Education and conceptualization. Polit Behav 10, 316–332 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990806

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990806

Keywords

  • Information Processing
  • Empirical Analysis
  • Belief System
  • National Election
  • Election Study