Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 285–293 | Cite as

Political variables in political socialization: Reply to “the dynamics of interpersonal attitudinal influence”

  • Kent L. Tedin
Article

Abstract

In this paper two arguments are advanced with regard to parental influence on adolescent political attitudes. First, variables like “parental affect,” which are of considerable theoretical interest to social psychologists, are of relatively little interest to the system-level concerns of political scientists because of their lack of variance. Second, the additive issue salience/perceptual accuracy model I proposed (1974) is a better fit to the data than a multiplicative cue-giving/parental affect model proposed in this journal by Cundy (1979). The fit of the two models is tested with the Jennings (1965) socialization data.

Keywords

Social Psychologist Political Scientist Accuracy Model Theoretical Interest Political Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Converse, P. E., and Dupeux, G. Politicization of the electorate in the United States and France. In A. Campbell, P. Converse, W. Miller, and D. Stokes (Eds.),Elections and the political order. New York: Wiley, 1965, pp. 269–291.Google Scholar
  2. Cundy, D. T.,The Dynamics of Interpersonal Attitudinal Influence: Some Additional Evidence.Political Behavior, 1979,1, 269–284.Google Scholar
  3. Easton, D. and Dennis, J.Children in the political system. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.Google Scholar
  4. Erikson, R. S., Luttbeg, N. R., and Tedin, K. L.American public opinion: its origin, content and impact. New York: Wiley, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  5. Greenstein, F. I., A note on the ambiguity of “political socialization:” definitions, criticisms, and strategies of inquiry.Journal of Politics, 1970,32, 969–978.Google Scholar
  6. Niemi, R. G.How family members perceive each other. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. Reynolds, P. D. A primer in theory construction. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1971.Google Scholar
  8. Tedin, K. L.Parental influence on the political attitudes of new voters, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. Tedin, K. L. The influence of parents on the political attitudes of adolescents.American Political Science Review 1974,63, 1579–1592.Google Scholar
  10. Tedin, K. L. On the reliability of reported political attitudes.American Journal of Political Science 1976,20, 117–124.Google Scholar
  11. Wahlke, J. C. Pre-behavioralism in political science.American Political Science Review 1979,73, 9–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kent L. Tedin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of HoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations