Abstract
This study explores the utility of psychological content analysis in studying judicial behavior. Justices' testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee was scored for power, achievement, and affiliation imagery using content analysis techniques developed by Winter (1982a). The results suggest that motivational content analysis may provide a more direct means of assessing the relationship between judges' psychological disposition and their decision making behavior. Combinations of motive imagery variables and social background variables explained between 64% and 83% of the variation in writing opinions and in casting concurring and dissenting votes among U.S. Supreme Court justices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkins, B., Alpert, L., Zeller, R. (1980). Personality theory and judging.Law and Policy Quarterly 2: 189–220.
Atkinson, J. W., ed. (1958).Motives in Fantasy Action and Society: A Method of Assessment and Study. New York: Van Nostrand.
Atkinson, J., Heynes, R., and Veroff, J. (1958). The effects of experimental arousal of the affiliation motive on Thematic Apperception. In J. Atkinson (ed.),Motives in Fantasy Action and Society. New York: Van Nostrand.
Bowen, D. (1965). The explanation of judicial voting behavior from sociological characteristics of judges. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
Boyatzis, R. (1973). Affiliation motivation. In D. McClelland and R. Steele (eds.),Human Motivation. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
Brenner, S. (1982). Strategic choice and opinion assignment of the U.S. Supreme Court,Western Political Quarterly 35: 204–11.
Cortes, J. B. and Gatti, F. M. (1972).Delinquency and Crime: A Biopsychosocial Approach. New York: Seminar Press.
Danelski, D. (1966). Values as variables in judicial decision making.Vanderbilt Law Review 19: 721–40.
Danelski, D. (1967). Conflict and its resolution in the U.S. Supreme Court.Journal of Conflict Resolution 11 (1): 71–86.
Danelski, D. (1970). Legislative and judicial decision making: The case of Harold H. Burton. In S. Ulmer (ed.),Political Decision Making. New York: Van Nostrand.
Donley, R. and Winter, D. (1970). Measuring the motives of public officials at a distance,Behavioral Science 15, 227–63.
Gibson, J. (1981). Personality and elite political behavior: The influence of self-esteem on judicial decision making.”Journal of Politics 43: 104–25.
Goldman, S. (1966). Voting behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals revisited,American Political Science Review 69: 374–83.
Goldman, S. (1975). Voting behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals revisited,American Political Science Review 69: 491–506.
Grossman, J. (1962). Role playing and the analyses of judicial behavior: The Case of Mr. Justice Frankfurter.Journal of Public Law 11: 285–309.
Heynes, R., Veroff, J., and Atkinson, J. (1959). A scoring manual for the application motive. In J. Atkinson (ed.),Motives in Fantasy Action and Society. New York: Van Nostrand.
Hermann, M. (1980). Assessing the personalities of Soviet Politboro members.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6: 332–52.
Johnson, C. A. (1987). Content-analytic techniques and judicial research.American Politics Quarterly 15: 169–97.
Kort, F. (1957). Predicting Supreme Court cases mathematically.American Political Science Review 51: 1–12.
Kort, F. (1963). Content analysis of judicial opinions and rules of law. In G. Schubert (ed.),Judicial Decision Making. Glenco, IL: Free Press.
McClelland, D. (1961).The Achieving Society. New York: Van Nostrand.
McClelland, D. (1975).Power: The Inner Experience. New York: Irvington.
McClelland, D. (1985).Human Motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
McClelland, D., Atkinson, J., Clark, R., and Lowell, E. (1953).The Achievement Motive. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
McClelland, D. and Watson, R. (1973). Power motivation and risk-taking behavior.Journal of Personality 41: 121–39.
McClelland, D. and Winter, D. (1969).Motivating Economic Achievement. New York: Free Press.
McLauchlan, W. (1972). Ideology and conflict in Supreme Court opinion assignment, 1946–1962.Western Political Quarterly 25: 16–27.
Mischel, W. and Gilligan, C. (1964). Delay of gratification, motivation for the prohibited gratification and response to temptation,Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 69: 411–417.
Murphy, W. (1964).Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rathjen, C. J. (1974). Policy goals, strategic choice and majority opinion assignment in the U.S. Supreme Court.American Journal of Political Science 18: 713–724.
Rohde, D. (1972). Policy goals, strategic choice and majority opinion assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court.Midwest Journal of Political Science 16: 652–682.
Rohde, D. and Speath, H. (1976).Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: Freeman.
Schmidhauser, J. (1962).Stare Decises Dissent and the background characteristics of the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.University of Toronto Law Journal 14: 194–212.
Schnackers, U. K. and Klienbeck, W. (1975). Machtomotiv and Machthematisaches Verhalten in einem Verhandlungsspiel (Power motivation and power-related behavior in a negotiation game).Archiv fur Psychologie. 127: 300–319.
Schubert, G. (1965).The Judicial Mind. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Schubert, G. (1974).The Judicial Mind Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.
Segal, J. (1984). Predicting Supreme Court cases probabilistically: The search and seizure cases 1962–1981.American Political Science Review 78: 891–900.
Sheldon, C. (1974).The American Judicial Process. New York: Dodd, Mead.
Speath, H. (1964). Judicial restraint of Mr. Justice Frankfurter: Myth or Reality?Midwest Journal of Political Science 8: 22–38.
Speath, H. and Altfeld, M. (1986). Felix Frankfurter, judicial activism and voting conflict on the Warren Court. In S. Goldman and C. Lamb (eds.),Judicial Conflict and Consensus: Behavioral Studies of American Appellate Courts. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
Tate, C. N. (1981). Personal attribute models of voting behavior of U.S. Supreme Court justices.American Political Science Review 75: 335–367.
Terhune, J. (1968a). Motives, situation, and interpersonal conflict within prisoner's dilemma.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement 8(3), Part 2.
Terhune, J. (1968b). Studies of motives, cooperation and conflict within laboratory microcisms,Buffalo Studies 4: 29–58.
Ulmer, S. (1970). Dissent behavior and the social backgrounds of Supreme Court justices,Journal of Politics 32: 580–598.
Winter, D. (1973a).The Power Motive. New York: Free Press.
Winter, D. (1973b). The need for power: 1970. In D. McClelland and R. Steele (eds.),Human Motivation. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
Winter, D. (1980). Measuring the motives of Southern African political leaders at a distance.Political Psychology 2: 75–85.
Winter, D. (1982a).Revised Manual for Scoring Motive Imagery in Running Text. Unpublished manuscript. Wesleyan University.
Winter, D. (1982b). Motivation and performance in presidential candidates. In A. Stewart (ed.),Motivation and Society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Winter, D. and Stewart, A. (1978). Content analysis as a method of studying political leaders. In M. Hermann (ed.),A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders. New York: Free Press.
Winter, D. and Stewart, A. (1977). Power motivation. In H. London and J. Ehner, (eds.),Dimensions of Personality. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aliotta, J.M. Social backgrounds, social motives and participation on the U.S. Supreme Court. Polit Behav 10, 267–284 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990555
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990555