Skip to main content

The 1984 election as Anthony downs and Stanley Kelley might interpret it

Abstract

This paper is an analysis of two rational choice theories of elections. Anthony Downs and Stanley Kelley's theories yield complementary interpretations of the 1984 U. S. election. Reagan's victory was based on both prospective and retrospective judgments as well as on candidate and policy considerations. Reagan won that element of an incumbent's reelection that is a referendum on his performance as president. However, people also voted on the basis of domestic and foreign policy preferences for the second term. On these issues voters preferred Mondale as much as Reagan. Reagan's victory owed remarkably little to his conservative agenda and to a warm regard for his personal qualities as a leader. His landslide was deceptive. The two Reagan victories were among the weakest of the six landslides of the postwar period by Kelley's test of decisiveness. The Reagan elections have not set the United States on the course of a long-term conservative agenda in either domestic or foreign affairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Boyd, Richard W. (1986). Electoral change and the floating voter: The Reagan elections.Political Behavior 8: 230–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, Emmett H., Jr. (1987). Review essay: The 1984 elections.Journal of Politics 49: 581–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, James M., Melvin J. Hinich, and Nancy R. Mendell. (1986). An empirical evaluation of alternative spatial models of elections.Journal of Politics 48: 675–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Stephen, and Michael Nelson. (1985). Foreign policy: Dominance and decisiveness in presidential elections. In Michael Nelson (ed.),The Elections of 1984. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Albert R. (1985). The campaign and the issues. In Austin Ranney (ed.),The American Election of 1984. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald. (1977).The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeter, Scott. (1985). Public opinion in 1984. In Marlene Michels Pomper (ed.),the Elections of 1984: Reports and Interpretations. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, Stanley, Jr. (1983).Interpreting Elections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O., Jr. (1964).Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, Gregory B., and Philip E. Converse. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous model of electoral choice.American Political Science Review 73: 1055–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., Martin P. Wattenberg, and Oksana Malanchuk. (1986). Schematic assessment of presidential candidates.American Political Science Review 80: 521–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Jonathan (ed.). (1986).Campaign for President: The Managers Look at '84. Dover, MA: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scammon, Richard M., and Ben J. Wattenberg. (1970).The Real Majority. New York: Coward-McCann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, William. (1985). The November 6 vote for president: What did it mean? In Austin Ranney (ed.),The American Elections of 1984. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, J. Merrill, and Warren E. Miller. (1985). Policy direction and performance evaluation: Complementary explanations of the Reagan elections. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Smith, Jeffrey A. (1980).American Presidential Elections: Trust and the Rational Voter. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, Donald E. (1966). Spatial models of party competition. In Angus Campbell et al.,Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin P. (1986). The Reagan polarization phenomenon and the continuing downward slide in presidential candidate popularity.American Politics Quarterly 14: 219–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin P. (1987). The hollow realignment: Partisan change in a candidate-centered era.Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, Robert. (1976).Public Opinion and Popular Government. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyd, R.W., Mencher, P.R., Paseltiner, P.J. et al. The 1984 election as Anthony downs and Stanley Kelley might interpret it. Polit Behav 10, 197–213 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990551

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990551

Keywords

  • Foreign Policy
  • Rational Choice
  • Choice Theory
  • Policy Preference
  • Foreign Affair