Political Behavior

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 259–286 | Cite as

Belief systems concerning the environment: The general public, attentive publics, and state legislators

  • John C. Pierce
  • Nicholas P. LovrichJr.


This paper examines multiple characteristics of belief systems among people at different levels in the policy process using the same measures in the same time period. More specifically, it analyzes belief systems concerning the environment among the general public, several attentive publics, and state legislators in Idaho. The following belief system characteristics are probed: horizontal constraint among specific issue beliefs, and between general environmental orientations and party and ideology; vertical constraint between the general environmental orientation and specific issue beliefs; and the role of general orientations in screening incoming information. Legislators are more likely to connect their environmental beliefs to partisan and ideological orientations. However, attentive and general public respondents do exhibit substantial constraintwithin the environmental issue domain; individual self-placement on a preservationist-developmentalist dimension appears to provide a cohering force in orientations to the environment. While legislators exhibit greater belief connections with general political orientations, the results also suggest an order in the public's beliefs about the environment and in the nature of conflict over the environment.


General Public Belief System Political Orientation Policy Process Multiple Characteristic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barton, A. H., and Parsons, R. W. (1977). “Measuring Belief System Structure.”Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 159–180.Google Scholar
  2. Buttel, F. H., and Flinn, W. L. (1978). “The Politics of Environmental Concern: The Impacts of Party Identification and Political Ideology on Environmental Attitudes.”Environment and Behavior 10: 17–36.Google Scholar
  3. Buttel, F. H., and Flinn, W. L. (1974). “The Structure of Support for the Environmental Movement.”Rural Sociology 39: 56–69.Google Scholar
  4. Calvert, J. W. (1979). “The Social and Ideological Bases of Support for Environmental Legislation: An Examination of Public Attitudes and Legislative Action.”The Western Political Quarterly 32: 327–337.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (1960).The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Conover, P. J., and Feldman, S. (1980). “Belief System Organization in the American Electorate: An Alternate Approach.” In J. Pierce and J. L. Sullivan (eds.),The Electorate Reconsidered. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 49–67.Google Scholar
  7. Constantini, E., and Hanf, K. (1972). “Environmental Concern at Lake Tahoe: A Study of Elite Perceptions, Backgrounds and Attitudes.”Environment and Behavior 4:209–242.Google Scholar
  8. Converse, P. E. (1964). “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In D. E. Apter,Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  9. Converse, P. E. (1975). “Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” In F. Greenstein and N. Polsby (eds.),Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 4. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, pp. 75–169.Google Scholar
  10. Dillman, D. A. (1978).Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Dillman, D. A., and Christenson, J. A. (1972). “The Public Value for Pollution Control.” In W. R. Burch (ed.),Social Behavior, Natural Resources and the Environment. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 237–256.Google Scholar
  12. Downs, A. (1972). “Up and Down with Ecology—The “Issue Attention Cycle.”Public Interest, pp. 29, 38–50.Google Scholar
  13. Dunlap, R. E., and Allen, M. P. (1976). “Partisan Differences on Environmental Issues: A Congressional Roll-Call Analysis.”The Western Political Quarterly 29: 384–357.Google Scholar
  14. Dunlap, R. E., and Gale, R. P. (1974). “Party Membership and Environmental Politics: A Legislative Roll-Call Analysis.”Social Science Quarterly 55: 670–690.Google Scholar
  15. Dunlap, R. E., and Van Liere, K. D. (1978). “Commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm and Concern for Environmental Quality: An Empirical Analysis.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  16. Inglehart, R. E. (1977).The Silent Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kenski, H. C., and Kenski, M. C. (1980). “Partisanship, Ideology, and Constituency Differences on Environmental Issues in the U.S. House of Representatives: 1973–78.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  18. Lane, R. E. (1973). “Patterns of Political Belief.” In J. Knutson (ed.),Handbook of Political Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Mazmanian, D. A., and Nienaber, J. (1979).Can Organizations Change? Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1979.Google Scholar
  20. Mazmanian, D. A., and Sabatier, P. A. (forthcoming). “Liberalism, Environmentalism, and Partisanship in Public Policy-Making: The California Coastal Commissions.”Environment and Behavior.Google Scholar
  21. McEvoy, J. III (1972). “The American Concern with the Environment.” In W. R. Burch (ed.),Social Behavior, Natural Resources and the Environment. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 214–236.Google Scholar
  22. Nie, N. H., and Andersen, K. (1974). “Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure.”Journal of Politics 36: 540–591.Google Scholar
  23. Nie, N. H., Verba, S., and Petrocik, J. R. (1976).The Changing American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Paulsen, D. F., and Denhardt, R. B. (eds.). (1973).Pollution and Public Policy. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
  25. Pierce, J. C. (1977). “The Role of Preservationist Identification in the Belief Systems of Water Resource Group Leaders.”Polity 9: 538–550.Google Scholar
  26. Pierce, J. C. (1979). “Water Resource Preservation: Personal Values and Public Support.”Environment and Behavior 11: 147–161.Google Scholar
  27. Pierce, J. C., and Doerksen, H. R. (eds.) (1976).Water Politics and Public Involvement. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ann Arbor Science.Google Scholar
  28. Rokeach, M. (1972).Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Rosenbaum, W. A. (1973).The Politics of Environmental Concern. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  30. Sullivan, J. L., Pierson, J., and Marcus, G. E. (1978). “Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique and Some New Findings.”American Journal of Political Science, 22:233–249.Google Scholar
  31. Tognacci, L. N., Weigel, R. H., Wideen, M. F., and Vernon, D. T. A. (1972). “Environmental Quality: How Universal is Public Concern?”Environment and Behavior 4: 73–86.Google Scholar
  32. Weigel, R., and Weigel, J. (1978). “Environmental Concern: The Development of a Measure.”Environment and Behavior 10: 3–15.Google Scholar
  33. Wenner, L. M. (1974). “Federal Water Pollution Control Statutes in Theory and Practice.”Environmental Law 4: 251–293.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Pierce
    • 1
  • Nicholas P. LovrichJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceWashington State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations