Abstract
Changes in the wording of “core” measures of political attitudes in the American National Election Studies have generated a good deal of controversy about artifactual sources of change in the U.S. electorate. This research, based on several field experiments and replications, investigates the effects of using or not using various types of opinion filter questions that have appeared in the SRC/CPS series over the years. The analysis shows that the use of a filter interacts significantly with a respondent's level of education and interest in politics, particularly the latter, in determining whether a respondent will offer an opinion on a given public policy issue. But the study also demonstrates that such an interaction occurs primarily when the question about interest in politics is askedafter, rather thanbefore, a set of political issue items. In interpreting these order-and-context effects the authors develop a self-perception model of how respondents infer their interest in politics from information that isavailable in memory about their own behavior in the survey interview.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Balch, George (1979). “Statistical Manipulation in the Study of Issue Consistency: The Gamma Coefficient.”Political Behavior 1:217–241.
Bem, Daryl J. (1978). “Self-Perception Theory.” In Leonard Berkowitz (ed.).Cognitive Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 221–282.
Bishop, George F., Robert W. Oldendick, and Alfred J. Tuchfarber (1978). “Effects of Question Wording and Format on Political Attitude Consistency.”Public Opinion Quarterly 42:81–92.
Bishop, George F., Robert W. Oldendick, Alfred J. Tuchfarber, and Stephen E. Bennett (1978). “The Changing Structure of Mass Belief Systems: Fact or Artifact?”Journal of Politics 40:781–787.
Bishop, George F., Robert W. Oldendick, Alfred J. Tuchfarber, and Stephen E. Bennett (1979). “Effects of Opinion Filtering and Opinion Floating: Evidence from a Secondary Analysis.”Political Methodology 6:293–309.
Bishop, George F., Robert W. Oldendick, Alfred J. Tuchfarber, and Stephen E. Bennett (1980). “Pseudo-Opinions on Public Affairs.”Public Opinion Quarterly 44:198–209.
Bishop, George F., Alfred J. Tuchfarber, and Robert W. Oldendick (1978). “Change in the Structure of American Political Attitudes: The Nagging Question of Question Wording.”American Journal of Political Science 22:250–269.
Bishop, George F., Alfred J. Tuchfarber, Robert W. Oldendick, and Stephen E. Bennett (1979). “Questions about Question Wording: A Rejoinder to Revisiting Mass Belief Systems Revisited.”American Journal of Political Science, 23:187–192.
Bogart, Leo (1972).Silent Politics: Polls and the Awareness of Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.
Brunk, Gregory G. (1978). “The 1964 Attitude Consistency Leap Reconsidered.”Political Methodology 5:347–360.
Converse, Jean M. (1977). “Predicting No Opinion in the Polls.”Public Opinion Quarterly 40:515–530.
Converse, Philip E. (1970). “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In Edward R. Tufte (ed.),The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 168–189.
—— (1966). “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes.” In Angus Campbell et al. (eds.),Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley, pp. 136–157.
Davis, James A. (1974). “Hierarchial Models for Significance Tests in Multivariate Contingency Tables.” In Herbert L. Costner (ed.),Sociological Methodology 1973–1974. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 189–231.
Erickson, Robert S. (1979). “The SRC Panel Data and Mass Political Attitudes.”British Journal of Political Science. 9:89–114.
Francis, Joe D., and Lawrence Busch (1975). “What We Now Know about ‘I Don't Know’.”Public Opinion Quarterly 39:207–218.
Graber, Doris A. (1978). “Problems in Measuring Audience Effects of the 1976 Debates.” In George F. Bishop, Robert G. Meadow and Marilyn Jackson-Beeck (eds.),The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral, and Policy Perspectives. New York: Praeger, pp. 105–125.
Markus, Hazel. (1977). “Self-Schemata and Processing Information about the Self.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35:63–78.
Miller, Arthur H., and Michael MacKuen. (1979). “Informing the Electorate: A National Study.” In Sidney Kraus, (ed.),The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, pp. 269–297.
Nie, Norman H. with Kristi Andersen. (1974). “Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure.”Journal of Politics 36:540–591.
Nie, Norman H., and James R. Rabjohn. (1979). “Revisiting Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Or, Doing Research is Like Watching a Tennis Match.”American Journal of Political Science 23:139–175.
Nie, Norman H., Sidney Verba, and John R. Petrocik. (1976).The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Patterson, Thomas E., and Robert D. McClure. (1976).The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Elections. New York: G. P. Putnam.
Rapoport, Ronald B. (1979). “What They Don't Know Can Hurt You.”American Journal of Political Science 23:805–815.
Salancik, Gerlad R. (1977). “Extrinsic Attribution and The Use of Behavioral Information To Infer Attitudes.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35:302–312.
Schuman, Howard, and Stanley Presser. (1978). “The Assessment of ‘No Opinion’ in Attitude Surveys.” In Karl F. Schuessler (ed.),Sociological Methodology 1979. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 241–275.
Sullivan, John L., James E. Piereson, and George E. Marcus. (1978). “Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique and Some New Findings.”American Journal of Political Science 22:233–249.
Sullivan, John L., James E. Piereson, George E. Marcus, and Stanley Feldman. (1979). “The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same.”American Journal of Political Science 23:176–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bishop, G.F., Oldendick, R.W. & Tuchfarber, A.J. Experiments in filtering political opinions. Polit Behav 2, 339–369 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990173
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990173
Keywords
- Field Experiment
- Public Policy
- Good Deal
- Policy Issue
- Political Issue