Skip to main content
Log in

Legitimating impotence: Pyrrhic victories of the modern environmental movement

  • Articles
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The strengths and limitations of the modern environmental movement are assessed, using a contextual analysis, with a framework drawn from pragmatic analysis. Empirical summaries from recent policy-making supported by the movement: in community-based recycling, local toxic waste movements, and water pollution control document the fact that the movement has indeed developed some “sustainable resistance” in policy-making in the U.S. and at the Rio Conference. But it has also ignored those consequences of “environmental protection” which degrade the living conditions for many people of color and other low-income groups. The movement's failure to form enduring coalitions for linking environmental protection to social justice limits the movement's power, by permitting disempowered groups to be mobilized in opposition to environmental protection. We outline an alternative strategy, built around “sustainable legitimacy”, which will require changes in the composition and program of environmental movement organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, J. & Hager, M. (1992). Earth at the summit.Newsweek, June 1, 20–22.

  • Anderson, C. (1990).Pragmatic Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. U. (1989). Industrial metabolism and global change: Reconciling the sociosphere and the biosphere — global change, industrial metabolism, sustainable development, vulnerability.International Social Science Journal 41(3), 363–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P. & Baratz, M. (1962). The two faces of power.American Political Science Review 56, 947–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytic framework.American Political Science Review 57, 632–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1973).Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A. (1991). Letter from the Netherlands.The New Yorker, August 12, 52–65.

  • Barlett, D. & Steele, J. B. (1992).America: What Went Wrong? Kansas City: Andrews & McNeel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, S. (1992). Is it apocalypse now?Newsweek, June 1, 36–42.

  • Betz, C. (1992). Call to Detroit Summer '92. Letter.Greens Clearinghouse, May 1.

  • Bidwai, P. (1992). North vs. South on pollution.The Nation, June 22, 853–854.

  • Bluestone, B. & Harrison, B. (1982).The Deindustrialization of America: Plant Closings, Community Abandonment, and the Dismantling of Basic Industry. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, P. (1980).Inequality in an Age of Decline. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. & Mikkelson, E. J. (1990).Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. H. (1989). The test of our civilization.New Perspectives Quarterly, 6(1).

  • Bryant, B. & Mohai, P., (Eds.). (1992)Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkro, C. E. (1991a). From coercion to cooperation.Chicago Tribune, Ecology-Special Report 1991, November 17, 6–8.

  • Bullard, R. D. (1990).Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. D., editor. (1993).Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Crossroads. Boston, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, S. G. (1985).Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W. K. (1992). More hot air: U.S. chokes up Earth Summit emissions talks.In These Times, April 22–28, 12–13.

  • Burton, D. J. (1986). Contradictions and changes in labour response to distributional implications of environmental-resource policies. Pp. 287–314 in A. Schnaiberg, N. Watts, and K. Zimmermann (eds.),Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy. Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, F. H. (1985). Environmental quality and the state: Some political-sociological observations on environmental regulation. Pp. 167–188 in R. G. Braungart and M. M. Braungart (eds.),Research in Political Sociology. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1986). Economic stagnation, scarcity, and changing commitments to distributional policies in environmental-resource issues. Pp. 221–238 in A. Schnaiberg, N. Watts, and K. Zimmermann (eds.),Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy. Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canan, P. (1992). SLAPPS: democratic rights and professional risks.ASA Footnotes, August, 4.

  • Catton, W. R., Jr. (1980).Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1986). Sustainable livelihoods. Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex, mimeo.

  • Claybrook, J. (1984).Retreat from Safety: Reagan's Attack on American Health. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Court, T. de la (1990).Beyond Brundtland: Green Development in the 1990s. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowfoot, J. E. & Wondolleck, J. M. (1991).Environmental Disputes: Community Involvement in Conflict Resolution. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. E. (1991). Uncommon futures: The rhetoric and reality of sustainable development.Environment, Technology & Society, no. 63, 2–4.

  • Dewey, J. (1922).Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1927).The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1939).Theory and Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T. & Rycroft, R. W. (1984). The Washington danger establishment. Paper presented at annual meetings of American Sociological Association. San Antonio.

  • —— (1987).The Risk Professionals. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Regens, J. & Rycroft, R. W. (1986). Sources of support for risk assessment and benefit-cost analysis in the environmental policy system. Paper presented at annual meetings of the International Association for Impact Assessment.

  • Devall B. (1980). The deep ecology movement.Natural Resources Journal 20 (April), 299–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowie, M. (1992). The new face of environmentalism: As big environmental organizations dodder, the movement's energy shifts to the grass roots.”Utne Reader, July/August: 104–111.

  • Dunlap, R. E. (1987). Polls, pollution and politics revisited: Public opinion on the environment in the Reagan era.Environment 29 (6), 7–11, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap R. E. & Mertig, A. G., (Eds.). (1992).American Environmentalism: The U.S. Environmental Movement, 1970–1990. Washington, DC: Crane Russak.

    Google Scholar 

  • During, A. B. (1989).Action at the Grassroots: Fighting Poverty and Environmental Decline. Worldwatch Paper No. 88. Washington, D.C.: Worldwatch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, G. (1992). A house of cards.Newsweek, June 1, 24–33.

  • Evernden, N. (1985).The Natural Alien. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark, M. (1990). Global water issues confronting humanity.Journal of Peace Research 27(2), 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farvar, M. & Glaeser, B. (1979).Politics of Ecodevelopment. Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society. Wissenschaftzentrum-Berlin.

  • Frahm, A. M. & Buttel, F. (1982). Appropriate technology.Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 11 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1992).The Culture of Contentment. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, B. (1984).Ecodevelopment: Concepts, Projects, Strategies. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, B. A. (1992). Alternative summit echoes U.N. conference's problems.In These Times, June 24–July 7, 10–11.

  • Gore, Senator A. (1992).Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, K. A. (1991a). The sweet smell of money: Economic dependency and local environmental political mobilization.Society and Natural Resources 4, 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- (1991b).Money, Management, and Manipulation. Environmental Mobilization in the Great Lakes, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Northwestern University, June.

  • —— (1992a) Putting the [W]R.A.P.s on public participation: Remedial action planning and working-class power in the Great Lakes.Sociological Practice Review 3(3): 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- (1992b). Doing as little as politics will allow: Great Lakes pollution sites and the limits of local pollution control. Paper presented at the North American Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Madison, WI, May.

  • -- (1992c). Legitimating growth: The role of the state in environmental remediation. Paper presented at annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Pittsburgh, August.

  • Gould, K. A. & Weinberg A. S. (1991). Who mobilizes whom? The role of national and regional social movement organizations in local environmental political mobilization. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Cincinnati, OH, August.

  • Groves, R. H. (1992). Origins of western environmentalism.Scientific American, July: 42–47.

  • Gunn, G. (1989). Authority and its distractions.Yale Review 78 (Spring), 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1992).Thinking Across the American Grain: Ideology, Intellect, and the New Pragmatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadden, S. G. (1989).A Citizen's Right To Know. Westview Press: Boulder, Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons.Science 162 (13 December), 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K. (1984).Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. P. (1969).Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890–1920. New York: Atheneum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1985). From conservation to environment. In Kendall E. Bailes (ed.),Environmental History. New York: University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. & Cockburn, A. (1992). Rhetoric and reality in Rio.The Nation, June 22, 848–853.

  • Illich, I. (1989). The shadow our future throws.New Perspectives Quarterly, 6(1).

  • Inglehart, R. (1977).The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1990).Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1907).Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. New York: Longmans Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. B. (1991). An Underused Resource. Division of Science and Research. New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection and Energy.

  • Krauss, C. (1992). Women and toxic waste protests: race, class and gender as resources of resistance. Paper presented at annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Pittsburgh, August.

  • Krupp, F. D. (1986). The third stage of environmentalism.EDF Letter XVII (August), 4.

  • Lake, L. (1982).Environmental Regulation: The Political Effects of Implementation. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landy, M. K., Roberts, M. J., & Thomas, S. R. (1990).The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the Wrong Questions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, J., Gillman, K., & Sheridan, D. (1984).A Season of Spoils: The Story of the Reagan Administration's Attack on the Environment. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, N. N. (1992). Environmentalists shift focus to inner city.Ann Arbor News, February 18.

  • Linn, N. & Vining, J. (1992). Attitudes toward recycling issues and willingness to spend tax money. Paper presented at the 4th North American Symposium on Society and Resource Management. Madison, WI, May.

  • Little, P. (1992). The Rio summit falls to earth as U.S. snubs global treaties.In These Times, June 24-July 7, 8–9.

  • Lowe, P. D. & Goyde, J. (1983).Environmental Groups in Politics. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P. D. & Rudig, W. (1987). Political ecology and the social sciences—the state of the art.British Journal of Political Science 16, 513–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. (1964). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory.World Politics 16 (4), 677–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice.Public Administration Review 32 (4), 298–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1979). The End of Liberalism. 2nd edition. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1986). The welfare state, the new regulation, and the rule of law. Pp. 109–149 in A. Schnaiberg, N. Watts, and K. Zimmermann (eds.),Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy. Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, A. (1993).Regarding Nature. Industrialism and Deep Ecology. Ithaca, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, D. & Sabatier, P. (1981).Effective Policy Implementation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Social structure and anomie. Chapter IV in hisSocial Theory and Social Structure. Revised and enlarged edition. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L. W. (1984).Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1992).Envisioning a Sustainable Society: Learning Our Way Out. Ithaca, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. (1980). How ‘soft’, ‘deep’, or ‘left’? Present constituencies in the environmental movement.Natural Resources Journal 20 (April), 345–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. (1992). The four stages of environmentalism.Utne Reader, March/April, 157, 159.

  • Morrison, D. (1977). Growth, environment, equity and scarcity.Social Science Quarterly 57 (2), 292–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1980). The soft, cutting edge of environmentalism: Why and how the appropriate technology notion is changing the movement.Natural Resources Journal 20 (April), 275–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1986). How and why environmental consciousness has trickled down. Pp. 187–220 in A. Schnaiberg, N. Watts, and K. Zimmermann (eds.),Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy. Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959).The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. (1992),Knowledge is Power: The U.S. Right To Know Act. Bulletin of Pollution Prevention. Newsletter of Great Lakes United. Spring 1992.

  • Needleman, J. (1991).Money and the Meaning of Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse, J. (1992). The diplomatic round: Earth summit.The New Yorker:, June 1, 64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, J. (1973).The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1988). Capitalism, nature, socialism: A theoretical introduction.Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 1 (Fall), 11–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ophuls, W. (1977).Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity: Prologue to a Political Theory of the Steady State. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, W. (1975). Malthusian theory and its development. Chapter 5 in hisPopulation. Third edition. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, K. (1989).The Politics of Rich and Poor: Wealth and the American Electorate in the Reagan Aftermath. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1993).Boiling Point: Democrats, Republicans, and the Decline of Middle-Class Prosperity. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramade, F. (1989). Ecological Catastrophes.Futuribles 1, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. (1984).Development and the Environmental Crisis: Red or Green Alternatives? New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1987).Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (1991).The Wealth of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrschneider, R. (1991). Public opinion toward environmental groups in western Europe: One movement or two?Social Science Quarterly 72, 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982).Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1989).Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, W. A. (1973).The Politics of Environmental Concern. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. (1989). The virtue of enoughness.New Perspectives Quarterly 6, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, A. (1975). Social syntheses of the societal-environmental dialectic: The role of distributional impacts.Social Science Quarterly 56 (June), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1977). Obstacles to environmental research by scientists and technologists: A social structural analysis.Social Problems 24 (5), 500–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1980).The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1982). Did you ever meet a payroll? Contradictions in the appropriate technology movement.Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 9 (2), Spring-Summer, 38–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1983a). Redistributive goals versus distributive politics: Social equity limits in environmental and appropriate technology movements.Sociological Inquiry 53 (2/3), Spring, 200–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1983b).Saving the environment: From whom, for whom, and by whom? Preprint, International Institute for Environment and Society, Wissenschaftszentrum-Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1983c). Soft energy and hard labor? Structural restraints on the transition to appropriate technology. Pp. 217–234 in Gene F. Summers (ed.),Technology and Social Change in Rural Area. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1985). Gas today or food tomorrow? Social choices and energy policies.Progress, Museum of Science and Industry 36 (5), September-October, 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1986a). The role of experts and mediators in the channeling of distributional conflicts. Pp. 348–362 in A. Schnaiberg, N. Watts, and K. Zimmermann (eds.),Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy. Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1986b). Future trajectories of resource distributional conflicts: Trends and projections. Pp. 435–444 in A. Schnaiberg, N. Watts, and K. Zimmermann (eds.),Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy. Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- (1990a). New w(h)ine in old bottles: Recycling the politics of recycling. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC, August.

  • —— (1990b). Recycling and redistribution: Progressive or regressive? Paper presented at the Midwest Radical Scholars Conference, Loyola University, Chicago, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • -- (1991). The political economy of consumption: Ecological policy limits. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC., February.

  • -- (1992a).Recycling vs. remanufacturing: Redistributive realities. Working paper WP 92-15. Center for Urban Affairs & Policy Research, Northwestern University, Spring.

  • -- (1992b).The recycling shell game. Multinational economic organization vs. local political ineffectuality. Working paper WP-92-16, Center for Urban Affairs & Policy Research, Northwestern University, Spring.

  • —— (1992c). Oppositions.Science 255 (20 March): 1586–1587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, A. & Gould, K. A. (1994).Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, A., Watts, N. & Zimmermann, K. editors. (1986).Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy. Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (1991).The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1973).Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabecoff, P. (1992).A Fierce Green Fire: The American Environmental Movement. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapere, D. (1984).Reason and the Search for Knowledge. Boston: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (1989).Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. F. Jr. (1984). The social fabric at risk.American Sociological Review 49, 711–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. T. (1992). Growth vs. environment: In Rio next month, a push for sustainable development.Business Week, May 11, 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M. & Kitsuse, J. I. (1977).Constructing Social Problems. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staggenborg, S. (1991).The Pro-Choice Movement: Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1986). Coalition work in the pro-choice movement: Organizational and environmental opportunities and obstacles.Social Problems 33, 374–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1989). Organizational and environmental influences on the development of the prochoice movement.Social Forces 68 (1), 204–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonich, S. (1990). The dynamics of social processes and environmental destruction: A Central American case study.Population and Development Review 15(2), 269–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretton, H. (1976).Capitalism, Socialism, and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suro, R. (1993). Pollution-weary minorities try civil rights tack.New York Times, January 11.

  • Tober, J. A. (1981).Who Owns the Wildlife? The Political Economy of Conservation in Nineteenth Century America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Public Information Research Group [USPIRG] (1989–1992).Working Notes on Community Right-to-Know. Washington, DC: USPIRG.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet, W. (1990). Human settlements in the U.S.: Questions of even and sustainable development. Paper presented at colloquium onHuman Settlements and Sustainable Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaahtorantz, T. (1990). Atmospheric pollution as a global policy problem.Journal of Peace Research. 27: 2 169–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wad, A., Lavengood, T. & Scallon, M. (1991). International cooperation for environmentally sustainable industrial development (ESID). Draft paper, Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Science and Technology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walljasper, J. (1992). The anti-green backlash: The media have forgotten environmental issues, but has the American public?Utne Reader March/April, 158–159.

  • Webster, D. (1992). Sweet home Arkansas: In Bill Clinton's backyard, a determined band of down-home activists proves the power of Green politics.Utne Reader July/August, 112–116.

  • Weinberg, A. S. (1991). Community Right To Know and the environment. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Meetings. Cincinnati, Ohio, August.

  • -- (1992a). Defining the success of a social movement. Paper presented at the Midwest Sociological Association Meetings, Kansas City, April.

  • -- (1992b). Where is the community in Community Right To Know? Paper presented at the North American Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Madison, WI. May.

  • -- (1993). Sociological narratives: The case for a pragmatic study of environmental movements. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Sociological Association, Miami Beach, FL.

  • World Commission on Enviroment & Development (1987).Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.

  • Worster, D. (1973).American Environmentalism: The Formative Period, 1860-1915. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, P. C. (1991).The Limits of Law: The Public Regulation of Private Pollution. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zald, M. N. & McCarthy, J. D. (1980). Social movement industries: Competition and cooperation among movement organizations.Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change 3, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gould, K.A., Weinberg, A.S. & Schnaiberg, A. Legitimating impotence: Pyrrhic victories of the modern environmental movement. Qual Sociol 16, 207–246 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990100

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990100

Key Words

Navigation