Skip to main content

Attitudes toward integration among black and white school board members: Public comparisons and etiological factors

Abstract

Comparisons of school board members' attitudes toward integration (derived from nationwide surveys of black and white school board members) with public attitudes toward integration indicate that (1) elites (school board members) appeared more liberal than the public for both races; (2) this gap between elites and the public was less distinct for blacks than whites; and (3) black school board members evidenced more liberal attitudes toward integration than white school board members.

Multiple regression analyses for school board members indicated that (1) race and education were the main factors determining board members' attitudes toward racial integration; (2) political participation showed a positive association with liberal attitudes toward integration; and (3) initial method of selection (elected or appointed) apparently bears no relationship to attitudes toward integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Aberbach, Joel, and Walker, Jack L. (1973).Race in the City. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, Earl R. (1973).Survey Research Methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus (1971).White Attitudes Toward Black People. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, and Schuman, Howard (1968).Racial Attitudes in Fifteen American Cities. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Counts, George S. (1927).The Social Composition of Boards of Education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, Robert L. (1968).The Politics of School Desegregation. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittell, Marilyn (1972).Local Control in Education—Three Demonstration School Districts in New York City. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (1972, 1974, and 1976).American National Election Study. Ann Arbor, MI: The Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, John S., and Shade, William L. (1973). “Citizen Participation, Democratic Representation, and Survey Research.”Urban Affairs Quarterly 9:57–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, Morris, and Marvick, Dwaine (1953). “Authoritarianism and Political Behavior.”Public Opinion Quarterly 17:185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Center for Political Studies (1973–1975).National Roster of Black Elected Officials. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, Fred N., and Pedhazur, Elazar J. (1975).Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, David, Robert T. Harris, and Robert L. Crain (1973).Political Strategies in Northern School Desegregation, Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin (1963).Political Man. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuthold, David (1968).Electioneering in a Democracy. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, Stanley (1973). “Generational Differences Among Blacks in the North.”American Journal of Sociology. 79: 550–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttbeg, Norman (1970). “Attitude Bias in Community Leadership Selection.”Social Science Quarterly. 51: 753–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, W.J. and Richard Centers (1959). “Authoritarianism and Urbanstratification.”American Journal of Sociology, 61: 610–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Herbert (1960). “Issues Conflict and Consensus Among Party Leaders and Followers.”American Political Science Review. 54: 406–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, Lester W. (1965).Political Participation. Chicago: Rand, McNally Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren, and Donald E. Stokes (1963). “Constituency Influences in Congress.”American Political Science Review, 52: 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Milton D. (1975).The Politics of Black America. New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Caucus of Black School Board Members (1973). National Roster of Black School Board Members. Dayton, OH: National Caucus of Black School Board Members.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, Kenneth (1970).The Recruitment of Political Leaders: A Study of Citizen-Politicians. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, Robert H. (1975). “Research on Political Participation.”American Journal of Political Science. 19: 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, Samuel A. (1955).Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, pp. 26–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, and Norman Nie (1972).Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Jeffrey W., and Sallie L. Warf (1973).Education Directory- Public School Systems 1972–1973. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Clifford J. (1979). “Social Bias in Political Recruitment: Ascribed and Achieved Status of Black and White School Board Members.”Social Science Quarterly, 59: 758–765.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wirth, C.J. Attitudes toward integration among black and white school board members: Public comparisons and etiological factors. Polit Behav 3, 201–209 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990095

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990095

Keywords

  • Regression Analysis
  • Positive Association
  • Multiple Regression Analysis
  • Board Member
  • Etiological Factor