Abstract
Using cohort analysis, this study addresses this primary question: What are the relative effects of appointing president, maturation, and time period on U.S. trial judges' voting behavior on civil rights and civil liberties cases? Specifically, we measure the relative impact of these variables on the liberalism of Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon appointees to the federal district courts. The data for the study are 4,553 opinions issued by these three presidents between 1969 and 1976 that were published in theFederal Supplement. In part, the study reveals that the effects of appointing-president cohorts are much stronger than the influence of maturation or time period. We also found that the Kennedy and Nixon cohorts have remained relatively stable over time and unaffected by maturation effects. The Johnson cohort, on the other hand, has become increasingly more liberal across time, particularly since the advent of the Burger Court.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson, Paul (1976). “Generational Change and the Decline of Party Identification in America, 1952–1974.”American Political Science Review 69:469–478.
Botwinick, J. (1973).Aging and Behavior. New York: Springer.
Carlsson, G., and K. Karlsson (1970). “Age Cohorts and the Generation of generations.”American Sociological Review (August):710–718.
Carp, Robert A., and C. K. Rowland (1983, forthcoming).Policy Making and Politics on the Federal District Courts. Knoxville, Tenn.: University of Tennessee Press.
Chase, Harold (1972).Federal Judges: The Appointing Process. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Cook, Beverly (1973). “Sentencing Behavior of Federal Judges: Draft Cases—1972.”Cincinnati Law Review 42:597–633.
Danelski, David J. (1966). “Values as Variables in Judicial Decision-Making: Notes Toward a Theory.”Vanderbilt Law Review 19:721–740.
Danelski, David J. (1969). “The Supreme Court of Japan.” In Glendon Schubert and David J. Danelski (eds.),Judicial Behavior: Cross-Cultural Studies of Political Decision Making in the East and the West. New York: Oxford University Press.
Danelski, David J. (1973). “Toward Explanation of Judicial Behavior.”Cincinnati Law Review 42:659–666.
Dolbeare, Kenneth (1968). “The Federal District Courts and Urban Public Policy: An Exploratory Study (1960–1967).” In J. Grossman and J. Tanenhaus (eds.),Frontiers of Judicial Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Gibson, James (1978). “Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes and Decisions: An Interactive Model.”American Political Science Review 71:911–924.
Giles, Michael, and Thomas Walker (1975). “Judicial Policy-Making and Southern School Desegregation.”Journal of Politics 37:917–936.
Glenn, Norval (1974). “Aging and Conservatism.” In Frederick Eisele (ed.),Consequences of Aging. The Annals. Philadelphia: Academy of Political and Social Science).
Glenn, Norval (1977).Cohort Analysis. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Goldman, Sheldon (1969). “Backgrounds, Attitudes and the Voting Behavior of Judges: A Comment on Joel Grossman's ‘Social Backgrounds and Judicial Decisions’.”Journal of Politics 31:214–222.
Goldman, Sheldon (1975). “Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited.”American Political Science Review 69:491–506.
Goldman, Sheldon (1981). “Carter's Judicial Appointments: A Lasting Legacy.”Judicature 64 (March):344–355.
Goldman, Sheldon, and Austin Sarat (eds.) (1978).American Court Systems: Readings in Judicial Process and Behavior. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Grossman, Joel (1965).Lawyers and Judges: The ABA and the Politics of Judicial Selection. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Grossman, Joel (1967). “Social Backgrounds and Judicial Decisions: Notes for a Theory.”Journal of Politics 29:334–351.
Hammond, Kenneth, Gary McClelland, and Jeryl Mumpower (1980).Human Judgement and Decision-Making: Theories, Methods and Procedures (New York: Praeger).
Inglehart, Ronald (1981). “Post-Materialism in an Environment of Insecurity.”American Political Science Review 75 (December): 880–900.
Jackson, Donald (1974).Judges. New York: Atheneum.
Johnson, Charles (1981). “Personnel Change and Policy Change on the U.S. Supreme Court.”Social Science Quarterly 69 (December):751–757.
Kritzer, Herbert (1978). “Political Correlates of the Behavior of Federal District Judges: A ‘Best Case’ Analysis.”Journal of Politics 40 (February):25–58.
Lamb, Charles (1976). “Exploring the Conservatism of Federal Appeals Court Judges.”Indiana Law Journal 56 (Winter):257–279.
Lieberman, Jethro (1981).The Litigious Society. New York: Basic Books.
McFeeley, Neil (1982). “The Judicial Selection Process in the Johnson Administration.” Paper prepared for delivery at the 1982 Western Political Science Association Meetings. March 26, 1982. San Diego, California.
Murphy, Walter, and Joseph Tanenhaus (1972).The Study of Public Law. New York: Random House.
Navasky, Victor (1974).Kennedy Justice. New York: Atheneum.
Neff, Alan (1981).The United States District Judge Nominating Commissions: Members, Procedures and Candidates. Chicago: American Judicature Society.
Partridge, Anthony, and William Eldridge (1978). “The Second Circuit Sentencing Study.” InA Report to the Judges of the Second Circuit. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center.
Peltason, Jack (1955).Federal Courts in the Political Process. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Peltason, Jack (1961).Fifty-Eight Lonely Men: Southern Federal Judges and School Desegregation. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Pritchett, C. Herman (1948).The Roosevelt Court. New York: Macmillan.
Pritchett, C. Herman (1954).Civil Liberties and the Vinson Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rappoport, Leon, and David Summers (eds.) (1970).Human Judgement and Social Interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Richardson, Richard, and Kenneth Vines (1970).The Politics of Federal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
Rowland, C. K., and Robert Carp (1980). “A Longitudinal Study of Party Effects on Federal District Court Policy Propensities.”American Journal of Political Science 24 (May):291–305.
Rowland, C. K., and Robert Carp (1981). “The Effects of Appointing President, Home-State Environment and Home-State Senators on Federal District Judges Policy Propensities: Economic Liberalism, 1960–1977.” Paper presented to 1981 Annual Meeting of Midwest Political Science Association, April 16, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sarat, Austin (1977). “Judging in the Trial Courts: An Exploratory Study.”Journal of Politics 39:368–398.
Schubert, Glendon (1969). “Two Causal Models of Decision-Making by the High Court of Australia.” In Glendon Schubert and David Danelski (eds.),Comparative Judicial Behavior: Cross-Cultural Studies of Political Decision-Making in the East and West. New York. Oxford University Press.
Schubert, Glendon (1974).The Judicial Mind Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.
Slotnick, Elliot (1980). “Reforms on Judicial Selection: Will They Affect the Senate's Role?” Part 1.Judicature. 63 (August): Part 2,Judicature. 64 (September: pp. 115–131).
Songer, Donald (1982). “An Empirical Method for the Study of Unanimous Decisions of Appellate Courts.”Western Political Quarterly, forthcoming.
Swisher, C. B. (1930).Stephen J. Field: Craftsman of the Law. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
Tanenhaus, Joseph (1968). “Supreme Court Attitudes Toward Administrative Agencies.” In Thomas Jahnige and Sheldon Goldman (eds.),The Federal Judicial System: Readings in Process and Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Tate, C. Neal (1981). “Personal Attribute Models of Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978.”American Political Science Review 75 (June): 355–367.
Ulmer, Sidney (1973a). “The Longitudinal Behavior of Hugo Lafayette Black: Parabolic Support for Civil Liberties, 1937–1971.”Florida State University Law Review 1:131–158.
Ulmer, Sidney (1973b). “Social Background as an Indicator to the Votes of Supreme Court Justices in Criminal Cases: 1947–1956 Terms.”American Journal of Political Science 17:622–630.
Ulmer, Sidney (1974). “Dimensionality and Change in Judicial Behavior.” In J. F. Herndon and J. L. Bernd (eds.),Mathematical Applications in Political Science (Vol. 7). Charlottesville, Virginia: University of Virginia Press.
Ulmer, Sidney (1979). “Parabolic Support of Civil Liberties Claims: The Case of William O. Douglas.”Journal of Politics 41:634–639.
Vines, Kenneth (1964). “Federal District Judges and Race Relations Cases in the South.”Journal of Politics 26:338–357.
Vines, Kenneth (1968). “The Judicial Role in the American States: An Exploration.” In J. Grossman and J. Tanenhaus (eds.),Frontiers of Judicial Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Walker, Thomas (1972). “A Note Concerning Partisan Influences on Trial-Judge Decision-Making.”Law and Society Review 6:645–649.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rowland, C.K., Carp, R.A. The relative effects of maturation, time period, and appointing president on district judges' policy choices: A cohort analysis. Polit Behav 5, 109–133 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989988
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989988