Skip to main content

On the reputation of state supreme courts

Political Behavior volume 5, pages 83–108 (1983)Cite this article

Abstract

A state supreme court, in making and justifying choices, uses a variety of sources of information and authority—its own precedents, scholarly commentaries, articles in law reviews, encyclopedias, restatements, and so forth. Quite often a state supreme court appeals to the wisdom or rejects the lack of it in the decision of a sister court in order to arrive at or buttress reasoning in a particularly problematic case. These citations—construed as derogation or deference—yield very handy and nonreactive indicators of hierarchies of prestige between and among the highest appellate courts of the several states. In this paper, I develop a simple and general measure of judicial reputation, present evidence on the hierarchy of state supreme courts as of 1975, show how this ranking has changed in the last 50 years, and examine competing and sometimes complementary explanations of judicial prestige. Taken together, social diversity, judicial professionalism, political ideology, and the size of case load provide an impressive explanation of the reputation of state supreme courts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Atkins, Burton M., and Henry R. Glick (1974). “Formal Judicial Recruitment and State Supreme Court Decisions.”American Politics Quarterly 6:427–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, Burton M., and Henry R. Glick (1976). “Environmental and Structural Variables as Determinants of Issues in State Courts of Last Resort.”American Journal of Political Science 20:97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Lawrence A., and Bradley C. Canon (1982). “State Supreme Courts as Activists: New Doctrines in the Law of Torts.” In Mary Cornelia Porter and G. Alan Tarr (eds.),State Supreme Courts: Policymaking in the Federal System. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, pp. 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, Edward N. (1973). “The Rhode Island Supreme Court: A Well-Integrated Political System.”Law & Society Review 8:167–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, Gregory A. (1982). “A Tale of Two Reforms: On the Work of the Supreme Court.” In Philip Dubois (ed.),The Politics of Judicial Reform. Lexington: D. C. Health, pp. 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canon, Bradley C., and Lawrence Baum (1981). “Patterns of Adoption of Tort Law Innovations: An Application of Diffusion Theory to Judicial Doctrines.”American Political Science Review 75:975–987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canon, Bradley C., and Dean Jaros (1970). “External Variables, Institutional Structure, and Dissent on State Supreme Courts.”Polity 3:175–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Bliss (1975). “Conclusion: Disputes and Reported Cases.”Law & Society Review 9:369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, Gerhard, and Richard A. Posner (1976).The Workload of The Supreme Court. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, Richard, and James G. March (1963).A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lawrence M. (1973). “Functions of Trial Courts in the Modern World.” Paper presented at the Conference on the Sociology of the Judicial Process, University of Bielefeld, Federal Republic of Germany, September 24–26.

  • Friedman, Lawrence M. (1977).Law and Society. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, Brian R., and Winter, Richard F. (1970). “The Politics of Redistribution.”American Political Science Review 64:508–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, Henry R. (1971).Supreme Courts in State Politics. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, Henry R. (1981). “Innovations in State Judicial Administration: Effects on Court Management and Organization.”American Politics Quarterly 9:49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, Henry R., and Kenneth N. Vines (1972).State Court Systems. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, John H., and Keith Hope (1972). “Occupational Grading and Occupation Prestige.” In Keith Hope (ed.),The Analysis of Social Mobility. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 19–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Virginia (1973). “Innovations in the States: A Diffusion Study.”American Political Science Review 67:1174–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Joel B., and Austin D. Sarat (1975). “Litigation in the Federal Courts: A Comparative Perspective.”Law & Society Review 9:321–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, Fred W., and Alan R. Richards (1975). “Variations in Elite Perceptions of American States as Referents for Public Policymaking.”American Political Science Review 69:850–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Peter (1979). “Some Predictors of the Interstate Diffusion of State common Law, 1870–1970.“ Paper prepared for delivery at the 1979 Annual Meetings of the Law & Society Association, San Francisco, California.

  • Harris, Peter (1980). “Problematic Cases and the Judicial Search for Authority.” Paper prepared for delivery at the 1980 Annual Meetings of the Law & Society Association, Madison, Wisconsin.

  • Hofferbert, Richard I. (1974).The Study of Public Policy. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. Woodford, Jr. (1981).Courts of Appeals in the Federal Judicial System. Princeton: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, Robert, Bliss Cartwright, Lawrence Friedman, and Stanton Wheeler (1977). “The Business of State Supreme Courts.”Stanford Law Review 30:121–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, Robert, Bliss Cartwright, Lawrence Friedman, and Stanton Wheeler (1978). “The Evolution of State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970.”Michigan Law Review 76:961–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John (1981).Congressmen's Voting Decisions (2nd ed.) New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner (1976). “Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Law and Economics 19:249–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, Edward O., and John P. Heinz (1977). “Specialization and Prestige in the Legal Profession: The Structure of Deference.”1977 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1977:155–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenski, Gerhard (1966).Power and Privilege. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1977). “The Relative Importance of Socioeconomic and Political Variables for Public Policy.”American Political Science Review 71:559–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1980).Applied Regression. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, Karl N. (1960).The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., and Herbert A. Simon (1958).Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvell, Thomas B. (1978).Appellate Courts and Lawyers: Information Gathering in the Adversary System. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvell, Thomas B., and Mae Kuykendall (1980). “Appellate Courts—Facts and Figures.”State Court Journal 4:9–14, 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Margaret P. (1978). “Courting Reversal: The Supervisory Role of State Supreme Courts.”Yale Law Journal 87:1191–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Donald R., and James A. Stimson (1975).Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merryman, John Henry (1954). “The Authority of Authority: What the California Supreme Court Cited in 1950.”Stanford Law Review 6:613–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merryman, John Henry (1977). “Toward a Theory of Citations: An Empirical Study of the Citation Practice of the California Supreme Court in 1950, 1960, and 1970.”Southern California Law Review 50:381–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Thomas R. (1975).The Virginia Supreme Court: An Institutional and Political Analysis. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott, Rodney (1936). “Judicial Influence.”American Political Science Review 30:295–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mott, Rodney, Spencer D. Albright, and Helen R. Semmerling (1933). “Judicial Personnel.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 167:143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Stuart S. (1962). “Sociometric Relations among American Courts.”Southwestern Social Science Quarterly 43:136–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panning, William H. (1981). “Networks, Information Flow, and Party Influence.” Paper prepared for delivery at the 1981 Annual Meetings of the Western Political Science Association, Denver, Colorado.

  • Panning, William H. (1982). “Information Flow and Party Influence: Theory, Measurement, and Policy Consequences.” Paper prepared for delivery at the 1982 Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

  • Riess, Albert J., Jr. (1961).Occupations and Social Status. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, Marvin D. (1972).Learned Hand's Court. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Richard D., and James C. Miller (1963). “Legal Evolution and Societal Complexity.”American Journal of Sociology 70:159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Martin (1965). “Stability and Change in Judicial Decision-Making: Incrementalism or Stare Decisis?”Law in Transition Quarterly 2:134–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Martin (1970). “Decentralized Decision-Making in the Law of Torts.” In S. S. Ulmer (ed.),Political Decision-Making. New York: Van Nostrand, pp. 44–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Martin (1972). “Toward a Theory of Stare Decisis.”Journal of Legal Studies 1:125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, Edward (1968). “Deference.” In John A. Jackson (ed.),Social Stratification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack L. (1969). “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States.”American Political Science Review 63:880–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack L. (1971). “Innovations in State Politics.” In Herbert Jacob and Kenneth N. Vines (eds.),Politics in the American States. Boston: Little, Brown, pp. 354–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron B. (1975).Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold, John T. (1976). “Political Orientations, Social Backgrounds and Role Perceptions of State Supreme Court Judges.”Western Political Quarterly 27:239–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, The University of Iowa, USA

    Gregory A. Caldeira

Authors
  1. Gregory A. Caldeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caldeira, G.A. On the reputation of state supreme courts. Polit Behav 5, 83–108 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989987

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989987

Keywords

  • General Measure
  • Case Load
  • Present Evidence
  • Political Ideology
  • Social Diversity