Skip to main content
Log in

Gratuitous language in appellate cases involving gay people: “Queer bating” from the bench

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An examination of appellate cases—state and federal—where homosexual behavior is under judicial scrutiny suggests that gay litigants are frequently the targets of gratuitous asides. Such language takes various forms. It also occurs with varying frequency depending on the type of case (criminal, employment discrimination, immigration and naturalization, licensing and incorporation, marriage, or child custody) under examination. The incidence of such language also varies with the level of the court involved (state vs. federal), and it also varies temporally, showing a general decline with the advance of time. The presence of such language is employed as an indicator of the legitimacy accorded gay litigants in the courtroom. Within this context, the impact and efficacy of litigation on behalf of gay people is also assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackstone, William (1811).Commentaries on the Laws of England, Vol. 4. London: William Reed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, D. J. (1964). “Deviation and the Criminal Law.”Journal of Criminology and Police Science 55: 446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coke, Edward (1917).Institutes of the Laws of England, Vol. 3, London: W. Clark & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Jerome (1949).Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldyn, Lawrence (1979). “Legal Ideology and the Regulation of Homosexual Behavior.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Hollis, John L. (1968). “Criminal Law—Sexual Offenses—Sodomy—Cunnilingus.”Natural Resources Journal 8: 536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, H. Montgomery (1956).The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde. New York: University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Eugene E., and Albert D. Klassen (1974). “Public Attitudes Toward Homosexuality: Part of the 1970 National Survey by the Institute for Sex Research.”Journal of Homosexuality 1: 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, Michael (1968). “Protest as a Political Resource.”APSR 62 (December): 1144–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, Grant (1966).Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960).The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, George (1973).Society and the Healthy Homosexual. New York: Anchor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. Harvie, III, and G. Edward White (1977). “Constitutional Protection for Personal Lifestyles.”Cornell Law Review 62: 595–596.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goldyn, L. Gratuitous language in appellate cases involving gay people: “Queer bating” from the bench. Polit Behav 3, 31–48 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989954

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989954

Keywords

Navigation