Skip to main content
Log in

Small group decision making: The uncertain role of information in reducing uncertainty

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although decision-making analysis has been widely pursued in political science and other fields, most emphasize an outcome orientation, ignoring (or assuming away) the process by which decisions are made. This study treats the process of decision making at the small group level by applying the cognitive information processing model to the methods by which search behavior reduces uncertainty in the collective environment. After examining the theoretical constraints on search behavior, an experiment is performed on student subjects with two of the constraints—information level and decision rule—operationalized as treatment variables on the volume and type of search by individuals in a small group environment. The findings suggest that increasing information availability and requiring consensus decisions will increase search, but that subjects are easily overloaded with information, increasing—not reducing—their uncertainty about their decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, R. P. (1971). “The Ideology Machine.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September, 1971.

  • Allison, T. (1971).Essence of Decision. New York: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. H. (1974). “Information Integration Theory: A Brief Survey.” In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, and P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. (1951). “Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgment.” In H. Guetzhow (Ed.),Groups, Leadership, and Men. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press, pp. 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. D. (1966).Power in Committees: An Experiment in the Governmental Process. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., and F. L. Geis (1970).Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. F. (1978). “Search Behavior in Small Decision-Making Groups: An Information Processing Perspective.” In R. Golembiewski (Ed.),The Small Group in Political Science. Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, P. (1962).Reason in Society: Five Types of Decisions and Their Social Conditions. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1967).Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, J. W., P.H.D. Goodwin, and L. A. Hazlewood (1972). “Political Discussion and Decision-making in Experimental Small Groups.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September, 1972.

  • Eulau, H. (1968). “Political Behavior”. In D. L. Sills (Ed.),International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (Vol. 12). New York: Macmillan and Free Press, pp. 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eulau, H. (1976). “Problematics of decisional models in political contexts.American Behavioral Scientists 20:127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J., and H. E. Kanter (1965). “Organizational Decision-Making.” In J. G. March (Ed.),Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand-McNally, pp. 614–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R. F. (1973).Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E. D. (1962). “Ego Involvement: A Gritical Examination of Some Methodological Issues.”Journal of Abnormal Psychology 64:407–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. P., and C. R. Plott (1978). “Committee Decisions Under Majority Rule: An Experimental Study.”American Political Science Review 72:575–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, W. J., and F. S. Silander (1959). “A Bibliographical Essay on Decision-Making.”Administrative Science Quarterly 4:92–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, C. F. (1967).Crises in Foreign Policy. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. D. (1967). “Cognitive Dynamics and Images of the Enemy.” In D. J. Finaly, D. R. Holsti, and R. R. Fagen (Eds.),Enemies in Politics. Chicago: Rand-McNally, pp. 25–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. D. (1976) “Cogitive Process Approaches to Decision-Making: Foreign Policy Actors Viewed Psychologically.”American Behavioral Scientist 20:11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. D., and A. L. George (1975). “The Effects of Stress on the Performance of Foreign Policy-Makers.” In C. P. Cotter (Ed.),Political Science Annual: An International Review (Vol. 6). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J. (1975). “Perspectives on a Consumer Information Processing Research Program.” In M. L. Ray and S. Ward (Eds.),Communicating with Consumers: The Information Processing Approach. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. (1972).Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. E., and L. Mann (1977).Decision Making. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantowitz, G. H. (1974).Human Information Processing: Tutorials in Performance and Cognition. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H., and J. W. Thibaut (1968). “Group Problem-Solving.” In G. Lindsey and E. Aronson (Eds).,Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 4). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 1–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1973).Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A. (1975). “Psychological Views of Decision-Making.” In C. P. Cotter (Ed.),Political Science Annual: An International Review (Vol. 6). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A., D. F. Davis, and R. D. Robertson (1976). “The Process of Political Decision-Making in Groups: Search Behavior and Choice Shifts.”American Behavioral Scientist 20:33–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, J. N. (1972).The Human Basis of the Polity. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. (1959).Political Life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1954). “Selective Effect of Personality on Political Participation.” In R. Christie and M. Jahoda (Eds.),Studies in the Scope and Method of “The Authoritarian Personality.” Glencoe, Ill.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H. M. (1976).Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leoni, B. (1957). “The Meaning of “Political” in Political Decisions.”Political Studies 5:225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madron, T. W. (1969).Small Group Methods and the Study of Politics. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, J. (1970).The Politics of Finance. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., and H. A. Simon (1958).Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. L. (1966).Fundamentals of Experimental Design. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofstad, Harold (1961).An Inquiry into the Freedom of Decision. Oslo: Norwegian Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. V., and J. N. Sheath (1975). “Impact of Prior Familiarity and Cognitive Complexity on Information Processing Rules.” In M. L. Ray and S. Ward (Eds.),Communicating with Consumers: The Information Processing Approach. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, pp. 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., and C. R. R. Snyder (1975). “Attention and Cognitive Control.” In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information Processing and Cognition. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, R. B. (1969).Power in the Senate. New York: St. Martins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. A. (1968). “Decision-Making: Political Aspects.” In D. L. Sills (Ed.),International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (Vol. 4). New York: Macmillan and Free Press, pp. 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.A., and R.A. Majak (1967). “A Theory of Decision-Making.” In J. C. Charlesworth (Ed.),Contemporary Political Analysis. New York: Free Press, pp. 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, H. M., D. M. Driver, and S. Streufert (1967).Human Information Processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1961).Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1957).Administrative Behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjei, S. S. (1973).Information for Collective Action. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., J. Bruner, and R. W. White (1956).Opinions and Personality. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solso, R. L. (1975).Information Processing and Cognition. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1974).Handbook of Leadership. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. (1961).Small Groups and Political Behavior: A Study of Leadership. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, P. (1964).Decision-Making: An Annotated Bibliography, Supplement, 1958–1963. Ithaca, N. Y.: Graduate School of Business and Public Administration, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, P., and F. S. Silander (1958).Decision-Making: An Annotated Bibliography. Ithaca, N. Y.: Graduate School of Business and Public Administration, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. (1974).The Politics of the Budgetary Process (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, H. L. (1967).Organizational Intelligence. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1966). “The Process of Cognitive Tuning in Communication.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 61:159–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robertson, R.D. Small group decision making: The uncertain role of information in reducing uncertainty. Polit Behav 2, 163–188 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989889

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989889

Keywords

Navigation