Abstract
In this paper, the concepts, methods, and findings underlying disputes between traditionalist and revisionist schools of mass-belief-system research are examined. It is argued here that revisionist critiques merit important modifications and qualifications in traditionalist concepts and methods, but not wholesale revisions.
The quantitative section seeks to demonstrate the continuing usefulness of the traditional approach for understanding public opinion and voting behavior. First, groups of individuals whose belief systems display a unidimensional or near-unidimensional structure are isolated from the general electorates of 1972 and 1976 using an individual level measure of belief consistency advanced by Barton and Parsons. Next a method of discerning voter projection of candidate issue stands developed by Bruner is used to compare the issue voting competence of consistent and inconsistent voters. Voters whose issue perferences are consistent with the liberal-conservative continuum are found to project less than their counterparts in both data sets examined.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Achen, Christopher H. (1975). “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.”American Political Science Review 69: 1218–1231.
—— (1977). “Measuring Representation: Perils of the Correlation Coefficient.”American Journal of Political Science 21: 805–815.
Asher, Herbert B. (1974). “Some Consequences of Measurement Error in Survey Data.”American Journal of Political Science 18: 469–485.
Barton, Allen H., and Parsons, R. Wayne (1977). “Measuring Belief System Structure.”Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 159–180.
Bennett, Stephen Earl (1973). “Consistency Among the Public's Social Welfare Policy Attitudes in the 1960's”American Journal of Political Science 55: 732–742.
Bennett, W. Lance (1975).The Political Mind and the Political Environment. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
—— (1977). “The Growth of Knowledge in Mass Belief Studies: An Epistemological Critique.”American Journal of Political Science 21: 465–500.
Bishop, George F., Oldendick, Robert W., and Tuchfarber, Alfred J. (1978). “Effects of Question Wording and Format on Political Attitude Consistency.”Public Opinion Quarterly 42: 81–92.
Brody, Richard A., and Page, Benjamin I. (1972). “Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting.”American Political Science Review 66: 450–458.
Brown, Steven R. (1970). “Consistency and the Persistence of Ideology: Some Experimental Results.”Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 60–68.
Bruner, Jere (1976). “What's the Question to that Answer: Measures and Marginals in Crosstabulation.”American Journal of Political Science 20: 781–804.
-- (1978). “Make Your Own Nixon: Projection of Candidate Issue Stand as a Fly in the Ointment of Policy Voting.” Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, 1978.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960).The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Converse, Philip E. (1964). “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In David E. Apter, (Ed.)Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press: 206–261.
—— (1971). “Attitudes and Non-attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In the Edward R. Tufte (Ed.),Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.: 168–189.
—— (1975). “Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” In Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (Eds),The Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 4. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., pp. 75–169.
Coveyou, Michael R., and Piereson, James (1977). “Ideological Perceptions and Political Judgment: Some Problems of Concept and Measurement.”Political Methodology 4: 77–102.
Field, John O., and Anderson, Ronald E. (1969). “Ideology in the Public's Conceptualization of the 1964 Election,”Public Opinion Quarterly 33: 380–398.
Jackson, Thomas H., and Marcus, George E. (1975). “Political Competence and Ideological Constraint.”Social Science Quarterly 4: 93–111.
Lane, Robert E. (1962).Political Ideology. New York: The Free Press.
—— (1973). “Patterns of Political Belief.” In Jeanne N. Knutson (Ed.),Handbook of Political Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 83–116.
Luttbeg, Norman R. (1968). “The Structure of Beliefs Among Leaders and the Public.”Public Opinion Quarterly 32: 398–409.
Marcus, George, Tabb, David, and Sullivan, John L. (1974). “The Application of Individual Differences Scaling to the Measurement of Political Ideologies.”American Journal of Political Science, 18: 405–420.
Miller, Arthur H., Miller, Warren E., Raine, Alden S. and Brown, Thad. (1976). “A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election.”American Political Science Review 70: 753–778.
Nie, Norman H., with Andersen, Kristi (1974). “Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure.”Journal of Politics 36: 540–591.
—— Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R. (1976).The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Pierce, John C. (1970). “Party Identification and the Changing Role of Ideology in American Politics.”Midwest Journal of Political Science 16: 25–42.
Pomper, Gerald M. (1972). “From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968.”American Political Science Review 66: 415–428.
—— (1975).Voters' Choice. New York: Dodd, Mead.
Repass, David E. (1971). “Issue Salience and Party Choice,”American Political Science Review 65: 389–400.
Shaw, Marvin E., and Costanzo, Philip R. (1970).Theories of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stimson, James (1975). “Belief Systems: Constraint, Complexity, and the 1972 Election.”American Journal of Political Science 19: 393–418.
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James E., and Marcus, George E. (1978) “Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique and Some New Findings,”American Journal of Political Science.
Tufte, Edward R. (1971). “Improving Data Analysis in Political Science.” InQuantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Weisberg, Robert (1976). “Consensual Attitudes and Attitude Structure.”Public Opinion Quarterly 40: 349–359.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1979 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wyckoff, M.L. Belief system constraint and policy voting: A test of the unidimensional consistency model. Polit Behav 2, 115–146 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989887
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989887
Keywords
- General Electorate
- Public Opinion
- Traditional Approach
- Belief System
- Level Measure