Skip to main content
Log in

Naturalism and intentionality

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ayer, A. J. (1952).Language, Truth, and Logic. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, D. (1989).Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1988). “How to Be a Moral Realist,” in G. Sayre-McCord (ed.),Essays on Moral Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. (1975). “What is a Theory of Meaning?” in S. Guttenplan (ed.),Mind and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. (1976). “What is a Theory of Meaning? (II)” in G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.),Essays in Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1987).Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1978).Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. (1990).Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. (1952).The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. (1984). “Supervenience and Cosmic Hermeneutics,”Southern Journal of Philosophy 22, Supplement on Supervenience.

  • Horgan, T. (1986a). “Psychologism, Semantics, and Ontology,”Nous 20, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. (1986b). “Truth and Ontology,”Philosophical Papers 15, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. (1991). “Metaphysical Realism and Psychologistic Semantics,”Erkenntnis 34, 297–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. (1993). “From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World,”Mind 102, 555–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. (1994). “Robust Vagueness and the Forced-March Sorites Paradox,”Philosophical Perspectives 8, 159–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and Timmons, M. (1991). “New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth,”Journal of Philosophical Research 16, 447–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and Timmons, M. (1992a). “Troubles on Moral Twin Earth: Moral Queerness Revived,”Synthese 67, 221–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and Timmons, M. (1992b). “Troubles for New Wave Moral Semantics: The ‘Open Question Argument’ Revived,”Philosophical Papers 21, 153–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and Timmons, M. (1993). “Metaphysical Naturalism, Semantic Normativity, and Meta-Semantic Irrealism,”Philosophical Issues, 180–203.

  • Kripke, S. (1980).Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L. (1977).Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1903).Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1922). “The Concept of Intrinsic Value,” in hisPhilosophical Studies. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1960).Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1969). “Ontological Relativity,” in hisOntological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975). “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’,” reprinted in hisMind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1981).Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1983).Realism and Reason: Philosophical Papers, Volume 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P. (1986). “Moral Realism,”Philosophical Review 95, 163–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rips, L. (1975). “Inductive Judgments about Natural Categories,”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8, 240–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979).Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982).Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1973) “On the Internal Structure of Perceptual and Semantic Categories,” in T.E. Moore (ed.),Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1975). “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104, 199–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). “Principles of Categorization,” in E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (eds.),Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1963). “Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man,” in hisScience, Perception, and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith E. and Medin, D. (1981).Concepts and Categories. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, C. (1946),Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. (1992). “What Is a Theory of Mental Representation?”Mind 101, 243–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. and Laurence, S. (forthcoming). “Intentionality and Naturalism,”Midwest Studies in Philosophy.

  • Sturgeon, N. (1984). “Moral Explanations,” in D. Copp and D. Zimmerman (eds.),Morality, Reason and Truth. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, M. (forthcoming).Morality without Foundations: A Defense of Ethical Contextualism.

  • Tye, M. (1992). “Naturalism and the Mental,”Mind 101, 421–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

For helpful comments and suggestions I thank Bill Lycan, David Sanford, John Tienson, Mark Timmons, Steven Wagner, and the audience at the Oberlin Colloquium. Special thanks to Frances Egan for her probing commentary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horgan, T. Naturalism and intentionality. Philos Stud 76, 301–326 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989833

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989833

Navigation