Skip to main content

Public support for congress

Political Behavior volume 3, pages 319–350 (1981)Cite this article

Abstract

The present inquiry focuses upon recent levels and trends of public support and nonsupport of the U.S. Congress. The data are drawn from statewide surveys of Wisconsin adults in 1970–1978 and from such sources as CPS/NES, Gallup, and Harris. Measurement focuses upon four major types of public support for Congress—pure specific support (performance), pure diffuse support (including general confidence in the institution, sense of personal efficacy in relation to Congress, desire for institutional reform or maintenance and the amount of power preferred for Congress relative to other branches), and two mixed types of support, long-term performance assessments and confidence in congressional incumbents. With few exceptions, Congress has suffered a general erosion of public support over the past decade on most indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Canada)

References

  • Bibby, John, and Roger Davidson (1967).On Capitol Hill: Studies in the Legislative Process. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolling, Richard (1965).House Out of Order. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, James M. (1963).The Deadlock of Democracy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, Hadley, and Mildred Strunk (1951).Public Opinion 1935–1946. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Joseph S. (1964).Congress: The Sapless Branch. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Joseph S., Ed. (1965).Congressional Reform: Problems and Prospects. New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Administrative Review (1977).Final Report: Survey Materials, Vol. 2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. House of Representatives 95th Congress, 1st Session (House Document No. 95-272).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, Thomas E. (1975). “The Swelling of the Presidency.” In Ronald E. Pynn (Ed.),Watergate and the American Political Process. New York: Praeger, pp. 204.15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Current Opinion (1973). I, pp. 9–10.

  • Davidson, Roger, David Kovenock, and Michael O'Leary (1966).Congress in Crisis. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Roger, and Glenn R. Parker (1972). “Positive Support for Political Institutions: The Case of Congress.”Western Political Quarterly 25:600–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Jack (1966). “Support for the Party System by the Mass Public.”American Political Science Review 60:600–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Jack (1970). “Support for the Institution of Elections by the Mass Public.”American Political Science Review 64:819–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Jack (1975a). “Trends in Public Support for the American Party System.”British Journal of Political Science 5:179–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Jack (1975b). “Mass Public Support for the U.S. Supreme Court.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Itasca, Ill.

  • Dennis, Jack (1976). “Who Supports the Presidency?”Transaction/Society 13:48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Jack (1980). “Changing Public Support for the American Party System.” In William J. Crotty (Ed.),Paths to Political Reform. Lexington, Mass.: Heath-Lexington, pp. 35–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David (1965).A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David (1975). “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.”British Journal of Political Science 5:435–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David, and Jack Dennis (1969).Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, Hazel Gaudet (1973). “The Polls: Presidential Power.”Public Opinion Quarterly 37:488–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, Richard (1975). “If, As Ralph Nader Says, Congress Is ‘The Broken Branch,’ How Come We Love Our Congressmen So Much?” In Norman J. Ornstein (Ed.),Congress in Change: Evolution and Reform. New York: Praeger, pp. 277–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Opinion Index (1967a). Report No. 22. Princeton, N.J.: The Gallup Poll, p. 20.

  • Gallup Opinion Index (1967b). Report No. 23, Princeton, N.J.: The Gallup Poll, p. 9.

  • Gallup Opinion Index (1973). Report No. 102. Princeton, N.J.: The Gallup Poll, p. 12.

  • Gallup Opinion Index (1978a). Report No. 156, Princeton, N.J.: The Gallup Poll, p. 10–12.

  • Gallup Opinion Index (1978b). Report No. 159. Princeton, N.J.: The Gallup Poll, p. 24.

  • Harris Survey,News Releases (1963–1981). New York: Louis Harris.

  • Huntington, Samuel P. (1965). “Congressional Responses in the Twentieth Century.” In David B. Truman (Ed.),The Congress and America's Future. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. (1968).Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, Malcolm E., and Samuel C. Patterson (1966).The Legislative Process in the United States. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenberg, Gerhard, Ed. (1971).Modern Parliaments: Change or Decline? Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezey, Michael (1977). “Support for the Legislature: Clearing Away the Underbrush.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

  • Miller, Arthur H., Edie N. Goldenberg, and Lutz Erbring (1979). “Typeset Politics: Impact of Newspapers on Public Confidence.”American Political Science Review 73:67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Glenn R. (1977). “Some Themes in Congressional Unpopularity.”American Journal of Political Science 21:93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Samuel C., G. Robert Boynton, and Ronald D. Hedlund (1975).Representatives and Represented: Bases of Public Support for the American Legislatures. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polls (1966). I, Summer.

  • Polsby, Nelson W. (1968). “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.”American Political Science Review 62:144–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Michael, and Kevin Appel (1978). “Network News Coverage of Congress”. Paper presented at the Northeastern Political Science Association Convention, Tarrytown New York.

  • Schlesinger, Arthur M. (1975). “The Runaway Presidency.” In Ronald E. Pynn (Ed.),Watergate and the American Political Process. New York: Praeger, pp. 133–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigel, Roberta, and Marilyn Brookers Hoskin (1977). “Affect for Government and Its Relation to Policy Output among Adolescents.”American Journal of Political Science 21:111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, David B., ed. (1965).The Congress and America's Future. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlke, John C. (1971). “Policy Demands and System Support: The Role of the Represented.” In Gerhard Loewenberg (Ed.),Modern Parliaments: Change or Decline? Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, James D. (1976).The Dissent of the Governed: Alienation and Democracy in America. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

    Jack Dennis

Authors
  1. Jack Dennis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dennis, J. Public support for congress. Polit Behav 3, 319–350 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989813

Keywords

  • Performance Assessment
  • Mixed Type
  • Major Type
  • Public Support
  • Specific Support