Skip to main content
Log in

Pollution and perception: Social visibility and local environmental mobilization

  • Articles
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why does local environmental degradation lead some communities to rebel while others remain politically complacent? This comparative analysis seeks a partial answer to that question through examination of the impacts of the social visibility of local environmental problems on political mobilization in the Great Lakes Basin. The data upon which this paper is based is drawn from original field research conducted in six environmentally contaminated communities in both the U.S. and Canada. The paper examines the efforts of industry, government and environmental organizations to manipulate the visibility of contaminants in order to promote or prevent the emergence of grass roots political activism. However, the data indicates that socially visible environmental disorganization increases local awareness of contamination, but has little bearing on the definition of that contamination as a problem requiring political action. The transformation of awareness of environmental problems into local political mobilization is not determined primarily by the social visibility of contaminants, their sources, or their impacts on the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashworth, William. 1987.The late Great Lakes: An environmental history. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, Robert D. 1990.Dumping in Dixie: Race Class and Environmental Quality. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenson, Matthew A. 1971.The un-politics of air pollution: A study of non-decisionmaking in the cities. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreschel, Andrew. 1988. In the bustling port of Hamilton recreation is second to commerce.Hamilton Spectator, 30 July.

  • Fogarty, David. 1985.Great Lakes toxic hotspots: A citizen's action guide. Chicago: Lake Michigan Federation, Toxic Control Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Kenneth A. 1991a. Money, management and manipulation: Environmental mobilization in the Great Lakes basin. Ph.D. dissertation. Northwestern University.

  • Gould, Kenneth A. 1991b. “The sweet smell of money: Economic dependency and local environmental political mobilization.” InSociety and Natural Resources: An International Journal. Vol. 4, No. 2. April–June.

  • Gould, Kenneth A. 1992. “Putting the (W) R.A.P.s on public participation: Remedial action planning and working-class power in the Great Lakes basin.” InSociological Practice Review. Vol. 3, No. 3. July.

  • Gould, Kenneth A. Adam Weinberg and Allan Schnaiberg. “Legitimating Impotence: Pyrrhic Victories of the Modern Environmental Movement.” InQualitative Sociology. Forthcoming, October 1993.

  • Greenpeace. nd.Hamilton Harbour: Site profile. Toronto: Greenpeace.

  • Great Lakes United, Water Quality Task Force. 1987.Unfulfilled promises: A citizen's review of the international Great Lakes water quality agreement. Buffalo: Great Lakes United.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Lakes United. 1988.A citizen's agenda for restoring Lake Ontario: Report of a regional meeting on Lake Ontario water quality issues. Buffalo: Great Lakes United.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton Harbour RAP Writing Team. 1988.A summary report of the goals, problems and options for the Hamilton Harbour Remedial Action Plan.

  • Indiana Department of Environmental Management. 1988.Draft: Northwest Indiana environmental action plan, area of concern remedial action plan. Indianapolis: Indiana Department of Environmental Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazis, Richard and Richard Grossman, 1991.Fear at Work: Job Blackmail, Labor and the Environment. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land Use Research Associates. 1986.Interim Report, Hamilton Harbour's water quality: The stakeholder's proposals. Toronto: Land Use Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Adeline Gordon. 1982.Love Canal: Science, politics and people. Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, Eric. 1988. Pollution level unacceptable.Hamilton Spectator, August 3, 1(B).

  • Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 1988.Guide to eating Ontario sport fish. Toronto: Communications branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, Penny. 1981.Blind faith: The nuclear industry in one small town. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, Allan. 1980.The environment: From surplus to scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, Allan. 1986. “Reflections on resistance to rural industrialization: Newcomers' culture of environmentalism.” InDifferential social impacts of rural resource development. Pam D. Elkind-Savatsky, editor. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, Allan and Kenneth A. Gould. 1994.Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5. 1989.Record of decision amendment summary: Outboard Marine Corporation/Waukegan Harbor. Chicago: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gould, K.A. Pollution and perception: Social visibility and local environmental mobilization. Qual Sociol 16, 157–178 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989748

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989748

Keywords

Navigation