Abstract
Using data gathered through participant observation and in-depth interviews, this article considers the phenomenon of non-mutual divorce in terms of the oppositional identities that divorcing partners establish through discourse. Divorcing partners describe feelings of mutual ambivalence prior to divorce, but they almost always transform themselves into “dumpers” (initiators/leavers) and “dumped partners” once their divorces begin. Most importantly, divorcing people establish these identities by invoking a cultural rhetoric of individualism on one side and a cultural rhetoric of commitment on the other. Although the two identities and their associated rhetorics are transitional, emerging only at the moment when one partner declares “I want out” and subsiding once the divorce is accomplished, they are significant means by which divorcing partners resolve ambivalence, account for their divorces, and impose a general sense of order onto the dissolution process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985).Habits of the heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Black, L. E., Eastwood, M. M. Sprenkle, D. H., & Smith, E. (1991). An exploratory analysis of the construct of leavers versus left as it relates to Levinger's social exchange theory of attractions, barriers, and alternative attractions.Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 15, 127–139.
Buehler, C. A., Hogan, M. J., Robinson, B. E., & Levy, R. J. (1986). The parental divorce transition: Divorce-related stressors and well-being.Journal of Divorce, 9, 61–81.
Buehler, C. (1987). Initiator status and the divorce transition.Family Relations, 36, 82–86.
Dixon, R. B., & Weitzman, L. J. (1980). Evaluating the impact of no-fault divorce in California.Family Relations, 29, 297–307.
Duck, S. (1982). A topography of relationship disengagement and dissolution. In S. Duck (ed.),Personal relationships. 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 1–30). London: Academic Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies.American Journal of Sociology, 61, 420–424.
Goode, W. J. (1956).After divorce. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Hagestad, G. O., & Smyer, M. A. (1982). Dissolving long-term relationships: Patterns of divorcing in middle age. In S. Duck (Ed.),Personal relationships. 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 155–188). London: Academic Press.
Harvey, J. H., Weber, A. L., Yarkin, K. L., & Stewart, B. E. (1982). An attributional approach to relationship breakdown and dissolution. In S. Duck (Ed.),Personal relationships. 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 107–126). London: Academic Press.
Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1979). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. In G. Levinger & O. C. Moles (Eds.),Divorce and separation (pp. 64–82). New York: Basic Books.
Johnson, M. P. (1982). Social and cognitive features of the dissolution of commitment to relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.),Personal relationships. 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 51–73). London: Academic Press.
Jones, B. W. (1986). The ambivalent spouse syndrome.Journal of Divorce, 10, 57–67.
La Gaipa, J. J. (1982). Rules and rituals in disengaging from relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.),Personal relationships. 4: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 189–210). London: Academic Press.
Levinger, G. (1965). Marital cohesiveness and dissolution: An integrative review.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 27, 19–28.
Levinger, G. (1976). A social psychological perspective on divorce.Journal of Social Issues, 32, 21–47.
Levinger, G. (1979). A social psychological perspective on marital dissolution. In G. Levinger & O. C. Moles (Eds.),Divorce and separation (pp. 37–60). New York: Basic Books.
Liss, L. (1987). Families and the law. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.),Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 767–793). New York: Plenum Press.
Nevaldine, A. (1978). Divorce: The leaver and the left. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Perinbanayagam, R. S. (1985).Signifying acts. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Perinbanayagam, R. S. (1991).Discursive acts. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Pettit, E. J., & Bloom, B. L. (1984). Whose decision was it? The effects of initiator status on adjustment to marital disruption.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 587–595.
Phillips, R. (1988).Putting asunder: A history of divorce in western society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ponzetti, J. J., Jr., & Cate, R. M. (1986). The developmental course of conflict in the marital dissolution process.Journal of Divorce, 10, 1–15.
Price-Bonham, S., & Balswick, J. O. (1980). The noninstitutions: Divorce, desertion, and remarriage.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 225–238.
Raschke, H. J. (1987). Divorce. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.),Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 597–624). New York: Plenum Press.
Riessman, C. K. (1990).Divorce talk: Women and men make sense of personal relationships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Riley, G. (1991).Divorce: An American tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rossiter, A. B. (1991). Initiator status and separation adjustment.Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 15, 141–155.
Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts.American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.
Spanier, G. B., & Thompson, L. (1984).Parting: The aftermath of separation and divorce. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
de Tocqueville, A. ([1840] 1969).Democracy in America. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
Vaughan, D. (1986).Uncoupling. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weiss, R. S. (1975).Marital separation. New York: Basic Books.
Weitzman, L. J. (1985).The divorce revolution. New York: Free Press.