Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Paradoxes of denotation

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bar-On, Dorit (1993) “Indeterminacy of Translation: Theory and Practice”.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LIII(4), pp. 781–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon and Etchemendy, John (1987)The Liar. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, Tyler (1979) “Semantical Paradox”.Journal of Philosophy 76, pp. 169–198; reprinted with a postscript in R. L. Martin (ed) 1984, pp. 83–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaifman, Haim (1992) “Pointers to Truth.”Journal of Philosophy, pp. 223–261.

  • Gaifman, Haim (1988) “Operational Pointer Semantics: Solution of Self-referential Puzzles I.”Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, M. Vardi and Morgan Kaufman (eds) Los Altos, California, 1988, pp. 43–60.

  • Gödel, Kurt (1944) “Russell's Mathematical Logic.” In: P. A. Schilpp (ed)The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, pp. 123–153. La Salle, Open Court.

  • König, Julius (1905). “On the Foundation of Set Theory and the Continuum Problem.” In: Van Heijenoort, 1967, pp. 145–149.

  • Kripke, Saul (1975) “Outline of a Theory of Truth.”Journal of Philosophy 72, pp. 690–716; reprinted in R. L. Martin (ed) 1984, pp. 53–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Robert L (ed) (1984)Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Charles (1974) “The Liar Paradox.”Journal of Philosophical Logic 3, pp. 381–412; reprinted with a postscript in R. L. Martin, 1984, pp. 9–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peano, Guiseppe (1906) “Super Theorema de Cantor-Bernstein et Additione”.Revista de Mathematica, t. VIII, pp. 136–157; reprinted in Peano,Opere scelte, Edizioni cremonese, Rome, 1957, Vol. 1, pp. 344–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri (1963)Mathematics and Science: Last Essays, Dover Publications Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, Frank (1925) “The Foundations of Mathematics.”Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Series 2, 25, 338–384; reprinted in Ramsey,The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, Richard Braithwaite (ed), Harcourt, Brace, New York, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, Jules (1906) “Les principes des mathématiques et le problème des ensembles.”Revue générale des sciences pures et appliquées 16, p. 541; translated in Jean van Heijenoort, 1967, pp. 143–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand (1906) “Les paradoxes de la logique”.Revue de métaphysique et de morale 14, pp. 627–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand (1908) “Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types.”American Journal of Mathematics 30, pp. 222–262; reprinted in Van Heijenoort, 1967 (ed), pp. 150–182 (this version cited here).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Keith (1993)Universality and the Liar: An Essay on Truth and the Diagonal Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Keith (1994) “A Paradox of Definability: Richard's and Poincaré's Ways Out.”History and Philosophy of Logic, 15, pp. 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Keith (1990) “The Diagonal Argument and the Liar.”Journal of Philosophical Logic 19, pp. 277–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolem, Thoralf (1922) “Some Remarks on Axiomatized Set Theory”. In: Van Heijenoort, 1967.

  • Tarski, Alfred (1983) “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages”. In: Tarski,Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics (second edition). Hackett 1983, pp. 152–278.

  • Tarski, Alfred (1969) “Truth and Proof.”Scientific American 220, pp. 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, Alfred (1944) “The Semantic Conception of Truth.”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, iv (1944), pp. 341–376; reprinted in Leonard Linsky (ed.)Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, University of Illinois, 1952, pp. 13–47 (this version cited here).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heijenoort, Jean (ed.) (1967)From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic. Harvard University Press, 1967.

  • Von Neumann, John (1925) “An Axiomatization of Set Theory”. In: Van Heijenoort, 1967, pp. 394–413.

  • Zermelo, Ernst (1908) “Investigations in the Foundations of Set Theory I”. In: van Heijenoort 1967.

  • Ziff, Paul (1972) “What is Said.” In: Ziff,Understanding Understanding. Cornell University Press, 1972, pp. 21–38.

  • Ziff, Paul (1988) “Linguistic and Communication Systems.”Philosophia 18, pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-3125, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Keith Simmons

Authors
  1. Keith Simmons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simmons, K. Paradoxes of denotation. Philos Stud 76, 71–106 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989721

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989721

Search

Navigation