Skip to main content
Log in

Surviving as a qualitative sociologist: Recollections from the diary of a state worker

  • Articles
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I describe my experience as a qualitative sociologist on the research staff of a government policymaking agency. Using specific examples from my experience, strategies for survival as a qualitative sociologist in a quantitatively-oriented setting are presented. It is proposed that: 1) qualitative methods need to be promoted as a credible and valuable approach to research and the individual researcher must “sell” him or herself as competent in the use of such methods; 2) social support networks with similarly inclined co-workers and sociologists outside of the workplace need to be developed and maintained and used to enhance the status of qualitative methods and qualitative sociologists; and 3) as is true for all researchers working in a policymaking or applied setting, it is necessary to recognize the reticular nature of social research and to demonstrate how qualitative methods generate information that is useful to policy or other applied purposes. By application of this approach in my own workplace, qualitative research methods have become an acceptable and even desirable part of many research projects of the agency and I have been able to continue to practice and to maintain my identity as a qualitative sociologist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P. and Adler, P. A. (1980). “Symbolic Interactionism.” pp. 20–66 in J. D. Douglas, et al. (eds.),Introduction to the Sociologies of Everyday Life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, N. McK. and Pykes, S. W. (1982).The Science Game-An Introduction to Research in the Behavior Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (1986).The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. (1963).Introduction to Sociology-A Humanistic Perspective. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. and Kellner, H. K. (1981).Sociology Reinterpreted-An Essay on Method and Vocation. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. N. and H. E. Freeman, (1975).Academic and Entrepreneurial Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. and Taylor, S. J. (1975).Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods-A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownstein, H. H. (1983). “The Adequacy of Intensive Interview Data: Preliminary Suggestions for the Measurement of Validity.”Humanity and Society 7, August, pp. 301–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (1982).The Uses of Social Research. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. and Stanley, J. C. (1963).Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P. and Reinharz, S. (1984).Computers and Qualitative Data-A Special Issues of Qualitative Sociology. v. 7, n. 1 and 2, Spring and Summer.

  • Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasi-Experimentation-Design and Analysis for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., Del Rosario, M., Hennigan, K., Mark, M. M., and Trochim, W. M. K. (1978).Evaluation Studies, Review Annual. Volume 3. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1982).Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1978).Sociological Methods-A Sourcebook. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. J., Brown, M. B., Engelman, L., Frane, J. W., Hill, M. A., Jennish, R. I., and Toporek, J. D. (1981).BMDP Statistical Software, (1981). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, D. 1984.Social Research Methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, H. E. and Rossi, P. H. (1984). “Furthering the Applied Side of Sociology.”American Sociological Review 49, pp. 571–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, W. R. and Keating, K. M., (1985). “Applying Sociology to Policy: Social Science and the Environmental Impact Statement.”Rural Sociology 50, pp. 578–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, D. C., Lebowitz, B. D., and Blake, G. F. (1976). “Program Evaluation in Correction.”Crime and Delinquency 22, July, pp. 309–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967).The Discovery of Grounded Theory-Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959).The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollin, A. E. (1983). “The Course of Applied Sociology: Past and Future.” Pp. 442–66 in H. E. Freeman, R. R. Dynes, P. H. Rossi, and W. H. Whyte (eds.),Applied Sociology-Roles and Activities of Sociologists in Diverse Settings. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. M. (1970). “The Base Expectancy Approach.” Pp. 807–13 inThe Sociology of Punishment and Correction, edited by N. Johnston, L. Savitz, and M. Wolfgang. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1973).Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labovitz, S. and Hagedorn, R. (1981).Introduction to Social Research. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landecker, W. S. (1955). “Types of Integration and Their Measurement.” Pp. 19–27 in P. F. Lazarsfeld and M. Rosenberg (eds.),The Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Reitz, J. G. (1975).An Introduction to Applied Social Research. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. Sewell, W. H., Wilensky, H. L. (1967). “Introduction.” Pp. ix-xxxiii in P. F. Lazarsfeld, W. H. Sewell, and H. L. Wilensky (eds.),The Uses of Sociology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. McC. (1976). “Presidential Address: Sociology for Whom?”American Sociological Review 41, December, pp. 925–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. R. and Greenwood, E. (1980).The Design of Social Policy Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M. H. (1985).AskSAM. Corpus Christi, TX: Seaside Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1945). “Role of the Intellectual in Public Bureaucracy.”Social Forces 23, pp. 405–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1949). “The Role of Applied Social Science in the Formation of Policy: A Research Memorandum.”Philosophy of Science 16, pp. 161–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968).Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. and Huberman A. M. (1984a). “Drawing Meaning from Qualitative Data: Toward a Shared Craft.”Educational Researcher May, pp. 20–30.

  • Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1984b).Qualitative Data Analysis-A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, M. and Press, J. S. (1973).Univariate and Multivariate Log-Linear and Logistic Models. Rand Corporation, R-1306-EDA/NIA.

  • Oppenheim, A. N. (1966).Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1978).Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1980).Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1981).Creative Evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philliber, S. G., Schwab, M. R., and Sloss, G. S. (1980).Social Research-Guides to the Decision-Making Process. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney, K. E. (1986).Approaching Public Policy Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. W. (1967). “The Sociologist in the Nonacademic Setting.” pp. 789–805 in P. F. Lazarsfeld, W. H. Sewell, and H. L. Wilensky (eds.),The Uses of Sociology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, L. and Strauss, A. L. (1973).Field Research-Strategies for a Natural Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1962).Collected Papers-I The Problems of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1964).Collected Papers-II Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, J. V. and Clark, J. A. (1984). “THE ETHNOGRAPH: A Computer Program for the Analysis of Qualitative Data.”Qualitative Sociology v. 7, n. 1 and 2, Spring and Summer, pp. 110–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selltiz, C., Jahoda, M., Deutsch, M., and Cook, S. W. (1966).Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M. and Faulkner R. R. (1980). “Thoughts on Five New Journals and Some Old Ones,”Contemporary Sociology 9, July, pp. 477–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1983). “The Prosecution of Felony Arrests, 1979”.BJS Report. NCJ-86482, December. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1984). “The Prevalence of Guilty Pleas.”BJS Special Report. NCJ-96018, December. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947).The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Tr. By A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Thanks to Vincent D. Manti and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Thanks also to Robert K. Merton for assuring me that the application of sociology is important and for giving me the word “reticular.” Nonetheless, opinions and points of view expressed herein are my own and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of any reader nor of the State of New York or any of its Divisions and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brownstein, H.H. Surviving as a qualitative sociologist: Recollections from the diary of a state worker. Qual Sociol 13, 149–167 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989684

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989684

Keywords

Navigation