Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 349–371 | Cite as

ATLAS/ti — A prototype for the support of text interpretation

  • Thomas Muhr


At the core of ATLAS/ti is an explorative approach to theory-building. With linear textual data, such as transcribed interviews, as a starting point, segmentation and coding (“textual phases”) of the text alternates with the building of conceptual networks and hypertextual structures (“conceptual phase”). The researcher may draw actual “maps,” consisting of boxes and connecting lines, that depict the linkages among concepts as a network. Memos can be written for any entity at any stage in the process. For proceeding to a coherent text-outcome, features like the compilation of text units, and cut & paste operations between different text windows are available. All interaction with the program is through a graphic user interface containing windows, menus and icons, since special emphasis is placed in this program on its “readiness-at-hand.”


User Interface Social Psychology Graphic User Interface Social Issue Cross Cultural Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anjewierden, A. 1987 “Knowledge acquisition tools.”AICOM, 0(1), 29–38.Google Scholar
  2. Böhm, A. 1989 “Bedarfserhebung für eine EDV-Unterstützung bei der Archivierung und Interpretation von Texten.” (Bericht aus dem Interdisziplinären ForschungsprojektATLAS, 89-1, TU Berlin).Google Scholar
  3. Böhm, A. 1991 “Vorschläge zur psychologischen Textinterpretation.” (Bericht aus dem Interdisziplinären ForschungsprojektATLAS 91-1, TU Berlin).Google Scholar
  4. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. 1990 “Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria.”Qualitative Sociology. New York: Human Sciences Press, 13, 3–21.Google Scholar
  5. Conklin, J., & Begeman, M. L. 1989 “gIBIS: A tool for all reasons.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(3), 200–213.Google Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, H. L. 1990 “Hermeneutics and artificial intelligence.” (Lecture held at ATLAS colloquium, TU Berlin).Google Scholar
  7. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publ.Google Scholar
  8. Gross, B. 1989Leben mit der Halbwertszeit. (Diplomarbeit) Berlin: Technische Universität.Google Scholar
  9. Konrad, E. 1990 “Phänomenologie und Künstliche Intelligenz.” (ATLAS-Bericht 2/90). Berlin: IFP ATLAS, Technische Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  10. Mayring, P. 1990Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung.München:PVU.Google Scholar
  11. Mergenthaler, E. 1987TAS/C Textanalysesystem, Benutzerhandbuch. Ulm: Ulmer Textbank.Google Scholar
  12. Miyata, Y., & Norman, D. A. 1986 “Psychological Issues in Support of Multiple Activities.” In Norman, D. A. & St. W. Draper (Eds.)User centered system design (pp. 265–284). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Muhr, Th. 1990 “Technikgestaltung für den Alltag am Beispiel der Softwareentwicklung für die sozialwissenschaftliche Technikforschung.” In Frey, D. (Ed.)Bericht über den 37. KongreB der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Kiel 1990, Vol. 1, pp. 368–369. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  14. Norman, D. A., & Draper, St.W. 1986User centered system design. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Oevermann, U., Allert, T., Konau, E., & Krambeck, J. 1979 “Die Methodologie einer ‘objektiven Hermeneutik’ und ihre allgemeine forschungslogische Bedeutung in den Sozialwissenschaften.” In H. G. Soeffner (Ed.)Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften, pp. 352–434). Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  16. Shneiderman, B. 1986Designing the user interface. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  17. Strauss, A. 1987Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Volmerg, U. 1983 “Validität im interpretativen Paradigma — Dargestellt an der Konstruktion qualitativer Erhebungsverfahren.” In Zedler, P., & Moser, H. (Eds.)Aspekte qualitativerr Sozialforschung. Obladen: Leske & Budrich.Google Scholar
  19. Willenborg, J. 1991PfleSaurus: Ein System zur Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Thesauri. (Diplomarbeit). Berlin: Technische Universität.Google Scholar
  20. Winograd, T. 1987 “A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work.”Human-Computer Interaction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 3, 3–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Muhr
    • 1
  1. 1.Technische Universität BerlinBerlin 12Germany

Personalised recommendations