Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 325–347 | Cite as

Computer assistance for testing hypotheses about qualitative data: The software package AQUAD 3.0

  • Günter L. Huber
  • Carlos Marcelo García


The analysis of qualitative data seems to be inevitably bound to tedious and time-consuming mechanical work, especially if we proceed to more complex analytical procedures like testing hypotheses. In this article we describe the general tasks of qualitative analysis, i.e., reducing data, structuring findings, and drawing conclusions. Then we outline, referring to the software package AQUAD 3.0, how software facilitates the work of qualitative researchers. By describing a practical application of this software, basic features of computer assistance to hypotheses testing are explained.


Qualitative Analysis Software Package Social Psychology Analytical Procedure Testing Hypothesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Gordo Rodriguez, J. J. 1991 Diarios de alumnos en practicas (provisional title). Doctoral dissertation (in preparation). Valencia, Spain: University of Valencia.Google Scholar
  2. Huber, G. L. 1989 AQUAD.Auswertung qualitativer Daten, Version 2.2, Tübingen: Bericht Nr. 25 aus dem Arbeitsbereich Pädagogische Psychologie der Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
  3. Jordell, K. 1987 “Structural and personal influence in the socialization of beginning teachers.”Teaching and Teacher Education, 3 3, 165–177.Google Scholar
  4. Lecompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. 1982 “Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research.”Review of Educational Research, 52 31–60.Google Scholar
  5. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. 1985Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Lisch, R., & Kriz, J. 1978Grundlagen und Modelle der Inhaltsanalyse. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Lowyck, J. 1984 “Teacher thinking and teacher routines: A bifurcation?” In R. Halkes & J. K. Olson (eds.)Teacher thinking: a new perspective on persisting problems in education. (pp. 7–18). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  8. McDermott, R. M. 1985Computer-aided logic design. Indianapolis: Sams.Google Scholar
  9. Miles, M. B. 1983 Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. In J. Van Maanen (ed.),Qualitative methodology. (pp. 117–134). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. 1984Qualitative data analysis. A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Ragin, C. C. 1987The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Shelly, A. 1986 “Life after coding — moving to higher levels of abstraction.” Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  13. Shelly, A., & Sibert, E. 1985The QUALOG user's manual. Syracuse: School of Computer and Information Science, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  14. Sibert, E., & Shelly, A. 1985 “Logic programming: Computer programming that complements qualitative research.” Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. Weber, R. P. 1985Basic content analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-049. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Günter L. Huber
    • 1
  • Carlos Marcelo García
  1. 1.Institut für Erziehungswissenschaft IUniversität TübingenTübingen 1Germany

Personalised recommendations